Wild Ennerdale: A Cultural Landscape

Chapter
Part of the World Forests book series (WFSE, volume 15)

Abstract

Ennerdale is located in the Lake District National Park, north-west England. The valley has been managed as coniferous plantation forest since the 1920s by the Forestry Commission. Since 2002, however, the Forestry Commission has been a partner (along with the National Trust and United Utilities) in the Wild Ennerdale (WE) initiative. The vision of WE is ‘to allow the evolution of Ennerdale as a wild valley for the benefit of people, relying more on natural processes to shape its landscape and ecology’. This chapter considers the relationship between WE and the cultural landscape of the Ennerdale valley, and has identified disparities between the WE view of engagement and participation and corresponding feelings of alienation, dispossession and dislocation expressed by some respondents. The chapter presents an argument for stronger links between the wilding project and the local community, and in doing so highlights many of the tensions and complexities found in wilding programs globally. We argue for a much greater appreciation of the role (rural) communities have played, and continue to play, in shaping the local landscape. Recognition of this role is important in terms of delivering sustainable wilding projects in the future.

Keywords

Public Good Cultural Landscape Lake District Forestry Commission United Utility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexander M (1996) A guide to the production of management plans for nature reserves and protected areas. Countryside Council for Wales, BangorGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackshall J, Manley J, Rebane M (2001) The upland management handbook. English Nature, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  3. Burton R, Mansfield L, Schwarz G, Brown K, Convery I (2005) Social capital in hill farming. Report for International Centre for the Sustainable Uplands, CumbriaGoogle Scholar
  4. Burton R, Schwarz G, Brown K, Convery I, Mansfield L (2008) The future of hefted upland commons in areas of high public goods provision: learning from the Lake District experience. In: Bonn A, Hubacek K, Stewart J, Allott T (eds) Drivers of change in uplands. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Carver S, Samson P (2004) Eee, it’s wild up North! Ecos 25:29–33Google Scholar
  6. Carver S, Evans A, Fritz S (2002) Wilderness attribute mapping in the United Kingdom. Int J Wilderness 8:24–29Google Scholar
  7. Cockbain W (2006) NFU claim victory on HFA. NFU Press Release (December 14)Google Scholar
  8. Cole DN (2001) Management dilemmas that will shape wilderness in the 21st century. J For 99:4–8Google Scholar
  9. Convery I, Dutson T (2006) Sense of place in Northern England. Biodivers Sci Manage 2:213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Convery I, Bailey C, Mort M, Baxter J (2005) Death in the wrong place? Emotional geographies of the UK 2001 foot and mouth disease epidemic. J Rural Stud 21:99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Convery I, Mort M, Bailey C, Baxter J (2008) Animal disease & human trauma. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conyers S, Garthwaite D, Bishop J, Boatman N (2008) Uplands entry level stewardship (UELS) final report. Central Science Laboratory, YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Cumbria County Council (2006) Cumbria’s parishes – people. http://www.cumbria.gov.uk/factsandfigures/Statisticsal-summaries/parish-profiles.asp. Accessed 14 Dec 2006
  14. Curry D (2002) Policy commission on the future of farming and food: farming and food a sustainable future. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Dutson T, Convery I (2007) Sense of place and community development in the Northern English uplands. Int J Interdiscip Soc Sci 1:37–48Google Scholar
  16. Fenton J (1996) Wild land or wilderness – is there a difference? Ecos 17:12–18Google Scholar
  17. Fenton J (2004) Wild thoughts followed up. Ecos 25:18–20Google Scholar
  18. Fielding AH, Haworth PF (1999) Upland habitats. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Fisher M (2003) Self-willed land – the rewilding of open spaces in the UK. http://www.self-willed-land.org.uk/rep_res/SELF.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2006
  20. Flora of the Fells (2006). http://www.floraofthefells.com. Accessed 5 Dec 2007
  21. Forestry Commission (1998) A new focus for England’s woodlands. England Forestry Strategy, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Franks J, Lowe P, Phillipson J, Scott C (2003) The impact of foot and mouth disease on farm businesses in Cumbria. Land Use Policy 20:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gray J (1998) Family farms in the Scottish borders: a practical definition by hill sheep farmers. J Rural Stud 14:341–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Green B (1995) Plenty and wilderness? Creating a new countryside. Ecos 16:3–9Google Scholar
  25. Habron D (1998) Visual perception of wild land in Scotland. Landsc Urban Plan 42:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hall CM, Page SJ (2002) The geography of tourism and recreation environment, place and space. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Höchtl F, Lehringer S, Konold W (2005) ‘Wilderness’ – what it means when it becomes a reality – a case study from the southwestern Alps. Landsc Urban Plan 70:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jerram R (2004) The Bowland initiative: a lifescape project a review of environmental outputs. Lancashire Rural Futures, LancasterGoogle Scholar
  29. Kirby K (2003) What might a British forest landscape driven by large herbivores look like? English Nature research report 530. English Nature, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  30. Kollock P (1998) Social dilemmas: the anatomy of cooperation. Annu Rev Sociol 4:183–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Long M, Convery I, Simmons E (2009) Stakeholder perspectives on the uplands entry level stewardship scheme and its significance for the future of upland farming. J R Agric Soc Engl 170:1–8Google Scholar
  32. Lowe P, Edwards S, Ward N (2001) The foot and mouth crisis: issues for public policy and research. Centre for rural economy working chapter 64. University of Newcastle upon Tyne, NewcastleGoogle Scholar
  33. MacDonald D, Crabtree JR, Wiesinger G, Dax T, Stamou M, Fleury P, Gutierrez Lazpita J, Gibon A (2000) Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: environmental consequences and policy response. J Environ Manage 59:47–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mansfield L (2008) The Cumbria hill sheep initiative: a solution to the decline in upland hill farming community in England? In: Robinson G (ed) Sustainable rural systems. Ashgate, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Marsden T (1999) Rural futures: the consumption countryside and its regulation. Sociol Rural 39:501–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matouch S, Forster J, Scott Jones P, Mitchell R, Rebane M, Rose P, Scheidegger C, Soier D, Stoll-Kleemann S (2006) Uplands thematic working group report. http://www.nbu.ac.uk/bioforum/Uplands.htm. Accessed 19 Dec 2006
  37. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1999) A new direction for agriculture England rural development plan. MAFF, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Nash R (1982) Wilderness and the American mind, 3rd edn. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  39. National Farmers Union (2008) Manifesto for the hills. NFU Scotland. Ingliston, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  40. National Trust (2008) Annual report 2007/08. http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-anual-report08-printversion.pdf. Accessed 2 Sept 2009
  41. Northwest Regional Forestry Framework Partnership (2005) The agenda for growth regional forestry framework for England’s north west. http://www.iwood.org.uk/. Accessed 5 Jan 2007
  42. Oxford Archaeology Unit (2003) Historic landscape survey. http://www.wildennerdale.co.uk/images/library/Historic%20Landscape%20Survey%202003.pdf. Accessed 2 Sept 2009
  43. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N (2000) Analysing qualitative data. Br Med J 320:114–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Potter C, Tilzey M (2005) Agricultural policy discourses in the European post-fordist transition: neoliberalism, neomercantilism and multifunctionality. Prog Hum Geogr 29:581–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Royal Society (2002) Inquiry into infectious diseases in livestock. Royal Society, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  46. Royal Society of Edinburgh (2008) Committee of Inquiry into the future of Scotland’s hills and islands. Royal Society of Edinburgh, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  47. Scottish Agricultural College (2008) Farming’s retreat from the hills. SAC, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  48. Slee B, Reed M, Convery I, Dutson T (2009) Supporting the Council for Rural Communities in its inquiry into the future of England’s upland communities. Tender document produced by The Macaulay Institute; Aberdeen Centre for Environmental Sustainability; University of Leeds Sustainability Research Institute & University of CumbriaGoogle Scholar
  49. Smyth AM (2006) Activity tourism in an upland landscape: dudes and hippies in the hills. Biodivers Sci Manage 2:223–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van de Berg AE, Koole SL (2006) New wilderness in the Netherlands: an investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan 78:362–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Waitt G, Lane R, Head L (2003) The boundaries of nature tourism. Ann Tour Res 30:523–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. WEP (2006) Wild Ennerdale Stewardship plan. http://www.wildennerdale.co.uk/managing-%20stewardship%20plan.htm. Accessed 23 June 2007

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National School of ForestryUniversity of CumbriaCumbriaUK

Personalised recommendations