Quantum Decoherence at the Femtosecond Level in Liquids and Solids Observed by Neutron Compton Scattering

Conference paper
Part of the Progress in Theoretical Chemistry and Physics book series (PTCP, volume 26)

Abstract

About 10 years ago, it was found that neutron scattering on hydrogen showed anomalously low cross sections in many materials when it was observed under Compton scattering conditions (i.e. with neutron energies larger than 10 eV, where the duration of the scattering process falls in the τ sc = 10−16 to 10−15 s range). The anomalies decreased with the neutron energy, which means that the cross sections approached normal values for long scattering times.

This phenomenon is interpreted here as due to an entanglement between the protons (because of their indistinguishability) during the scattering process, by which certain terms in the cross section are cancelled through the large zero-point motion of the protons. The anomalies disappear gradually as the proton states decohere in contact with the local environment. Fitted decoherence times range from 4•10−15 s for proton pairs in liquid hydrogen to 5•10−16 s in metal hydrides. For the proton pairs in water, the data are compared with a theoretical estimate for decoherence based on the influence of fluctuations in hydrogen bonding to nearby molecules.

The fast decoherence of locally prepared entangled states in condensed media studied here is compared with decoherence (in the 10−6 to 10−3 s range) in objects studied in quantum optics in high vacuum, with the disappearance of the superposition state in NH3 or ND3 molecules in dilute gases, and with the lifetime of superconducting qubits in solids (10−7 s) at low temperature.

In recent experiments, there are also indications for an energy shift in connection with the breaking of the n-p entanglement in neutron Compton scattering. Comments on this possibility will be given at the end of this chapter.

Keywords

Entangle State Metal Hydride Coherence Time Open Quantum System Quantum Superposition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Note Added in Proof

Very recent data on D2-scattering [31] at angles exceeding 100 degrees (shorter times) also indicate energy shifts in agreement with the prediction made in Fig. 22.14.

References

  1. 1.
    Brune M, Hagley E, Dreyer J, Maitre X, Maali A, Wunderlich C, Raimond JM, Haroche S (1996) Phys Rev Lett 77:4887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuhr S, Gleyzes S, Guerlin C, Bemu J, Hoff UB, Degléglise S, Osnaghi S, Brune M, Raimonde J-M (2007) Appl Phys Lett 90:164101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hornberger K, Hackermüller L, Arndt M (2005) Phys Rev A 71:023601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nakamura Y, Pashkin YA, Tsai JS (1999) Nature 398:786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Niskanen AO, Harrabi K, Yoshihara F, Lloyd S, Tsai JS (2007) Science 316:723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burkhard D, Koch RH, DiVincenzo DP (2004) Phys Rev B 69:064503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karlsson EB (1998) Phys Scripta T 76:179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karlsson EB, Chatzidimitriou-Dreismann CA, Abdul Redah T, Streffer RMF, Hjörvarsson B, Öhrmalm J, Mayers J (1999) Europhys Lett 46:617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chatzidimitriou-Dreismann CA, Abdul Redah T, Streffer RMF, Mayers J (1997) Phys Rev Lett 78:2839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sears VF (1984) Phys Rev B 30:44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reiter G, Silver R (1985) Phys Rev Lett 54:1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karlsson EB (2012) Int J Quant Chem 112:587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lovesey SW (1984) Theory of neutron scattering from condensed matter. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stock C, Cowley RA, Taylor JW, Bennington SM (2010) Phys Rev B 81:024303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chatzidimitriou-Dreismann CA, Abdul-Redah T (2004) Physica B 350:239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cooper MJ, Hitchcock AP, Chatzidimitriou-Dreismann CA (2008) Phys Rev Lett 100:043204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cowley RA, Mayers J (2006) J Phys Condens Matter 18:5291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karlsson EB, Chatzidimitriou-Dreismann CA, Abdul-Redah T, Hartmann O (2003) ISIS experimental report, RB 13245, Rutherford-Appleton LaboratoryGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Joos E, Zeh HZ (1985) Phys B 59:223Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Karlsson EB (2003) Phys Rev Lett 78:2839Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Karlsson EB (2004) Mod Phys Lett B 18:247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bratos S, Tarjus G, Diraison M, Leicknam J-C (1991) Phys Rev A 44:2745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Abdul-Redah T, Krzystyniak M, Chatzidimitriou-Dreismann CA (2005) In: Akulin VM et al (eds) Decoherence, entanglement and information protection in complex quantum systems, NATO Science Series. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chatzidimitriou-Dreismann CA, Abdul-Redah T, Mayers J (2002) Physica B 315:281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Breuer H-P, Petruccione FP (2002) The theory of open quantum systems. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hama J, Miyagi H (1973) Progress Thor Phys 50:1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fillaux F, Cousson A, Keen D (2003) Phys Rev B 67:054301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chatzidimitriou-Dreismann CA, Mac E, Gray A, Blach TP (2011) AIP Advances 1:022118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schulman LS, Gaveau B (2006) Phys Rev Lett 97:240405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bennett CH (1982) Int J Theor Phys 21:905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chatzidimitriou-Dreismann et al. (2012) Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research, Sect. A 676:120Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics and AstronomyUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations