Abstract
We describe a system that builds peer-2-peer multicast trees. The proposed system has a unique algorithm that incorporates real-time and priority-based scheduler into a graph theory with robust implementation that supports multiple platforms. Special consideration was given to conditional access and trust computing. We also describe the system design as well as the computational aspects of processing the graphs used by the system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Content delivery network.
- 2.
For example, after some other new clients have arrived, or old clients have disconnected.
- 3.
Internet service provider.
References
Bhushan AK (1971) File transfer protocol. RFC 114, April. Updated by RFC 133, RFC 141, RFC 171, RFC 172
Chun BG, Wu P, Weatherspoon H, Kubiatowicz J (2006) ChunkCast: an anycast service for large content distribution. In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on peer-to-peer systems (IPTPS)
Cohen B (2003) Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent. BitTorrent Inc., May. http://www2.sims.berkeley.edu/research/conferences/p2pecon/papers/s4-cohen.pdf
Feng C, Li B (2008) On large-scale peer-to-peer streaming systems with network coding. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on multimedia, pp 269–278
Fielding R, Gettys J, Mogul J, Frystyk H, Masinter L, Leach P, Berners-Lee T (1999) Hypertext transfer protocol—HTTP/1.1. RFC 2616 (draft standard), June. Updated by RFC 2817, RFC 5785, RFC 6266
Liu F, Li B, Zhong L, Li B, Niu D (2009) How P2P streaming systems scale over time under a flash crowd? In: Proceedings of the 8th international workshop on peer-to-peer systems, IPSTS 09
Liu Y (2007) On the minimum delay peer-to-peer video streaming: how realtime can it be? In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on multimedia, pp 127–136
Padmanabhan VN, Wang HJ, Chou PA (2005) Supporting heterogeneity and congestion control in peer-to-peer multicast streaming. In: Voelker GM, Shenker S (eds) Peer-to-peer systems III: third international workshop (IPTPS 2004). Lecture notes in computer science, vol 3279. Springer, Berlin, pp 54–63
Park K, Pack S, Kwon T (2008) Climber: an incentive-based resilient peer-to-peer system for live streaming services. In: Proceedings of the 7th international workshop on peer-to-peer systems, IPTPS 08
Postel J (1980) User datagram protocol. RFC 768 (Standard), August
Postel J (1981) Internet protocol. RFC 791 (Standard), September. Updated by RFC 1349
Postel J (1981) Transmission control protocol. RFC 793 (Standard), September. Updated by RFCs 1122, 3168, 6093
Postel J (1982) Simple mail transfer protocol. RFC 821 (Standard), August. Obsoleted by RFC 2821
Venkataraman V, Francis P, Calandrino J (2006) ChunkySpread: Multi-tree unstructured peer-to-peer multicast. In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on Peer-to-Peer systems, IPTPS 06
Zaidenberg NJ (2001) sFDPC—a P2P approach for streaming applications. MSc thesis, Tel Aviv University
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Averbuch, A., Roditi, Y., Zaidenberg, N.J. (2013). PPPC—Peer-2-Peer Streaming and Algorithm for Creating Spanning Trees for Peer-2-Peer Networks. In: Repin, S., Tiihonen, T., Tuovinen, T. (eds) Numerical Methods for Differential Equations, Optimization, and Technological Problems. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5288-7_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5288-7_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5287-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5288-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)