• Iris Hunger
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology book series (NAPSA)


Health and security have become intertwined in recent years. While this has been welcomed by many experts because it led to an increase in funding for selected public health activities, others worry that this development will distract from sustaining and improving basic public health services. The challenge, in particular in low- and mid-income countries, is to improve the public health system as a whole and simultaneously provide an appropriate level of awareness and response capability for the low-likelihood, but high-consequence event of a bioterrorist attack.


Biological Weapon United Nations Security Council Military Medical Academy Health Security Crimean Congo Hemorrhagic Fever 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Bansak KC (2011) Enhancing compliance with an evolving treaty: a task for an improved BWC intersessional process. Arms Control Today 41. Accessed 14 Sep 2011
  2. 2.
    BEP (2011) Biosecurity engagement project. US Department of State. Accessed 14 Sep 2011
  3. 3.
    BWPP (2011) Bioweapons monitor. Country report USA. documents/BWM%202011%20WEB.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec 2011
  4. 4.
    Elbe S (2008) Securitizing epidemics: three lessons from history. Paper presented at “Impacting health, the environment and global governance. The challenges of taking a security approach”. International seminar organized by the Institut Francais des Relations Internationales (IFRI). Paris. September 2008. Accessed 21 Dec 2011
  5. 5.
    Hunger I (2005) Confidence building needs transparency: a summary of data submitted under the bioweapons convention’s confidence building measures 1987–2003. The Sunshine Project. Accessed 20 Dec 2011
  6. 6.
    Hunter RE, Anthony CR, Lurie N (2002) Make world health the new Marshall Plan. RAND Rev 26(2). randreview/issues/rr-08-02/worldhealth.html. Accessed 18 Dec 2011
  7. 7.
    ICG (2001) HIV/AIDS as a security issue. Issues report no.1. International Crisis Group. Accessed 20 Dec 2011
  8. 8.
    Lee K, McInnes C (2003) Health, foreign policy and security: a discussion paper. UK Global Health Programme working paper no.1. The Nuffield Trust. London. Accessed 17 Dec 2011
  9. 9.
    Leitenberg M (2005) Assessing the biological weapons and bioterrorism threat. Strategic Studies Institute. United States Army War College: Carlisle, Pennsylvania. Accessed 21 Dec 2011
  10. 10.
    Sheehan CC (2008) Securitizing the HIV/AIDS pandemic in U.S. foreign policy. Dissertation. The American University.  =  frontcover&hl  =  de&source  =  gbs_ge_summary_r&cad  =  0#v  =  onepage&q&f  =  false. Accessed 24 Sep 2011
  11. 11.
    Tucker JB, Sands A (1999) An unlikely threat. Bull At Sci 55(4):46–52Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    UNAIDS (2010) Report on the global AIDS epidemic. globalreport/documents/20101123_GlobalReport_full_en.pdf. Accessed 24 Sep 2011
  13. 13.
    WHO (2007) The world health report 2007. A safer future: global public health security in the 21st century. Accessed 24 Sep 2011
  14. 14.
    WHO (2008) The world health report. Primary health care now more than ever. Accessed 20 Dec 2011
  15. 15.
    WHO (2010a) Global tuberculosis control. Summary. Accessed 24 Sep 2011
  16. 16.
    WHO (2010b) World malaria report. Executive summary. Accessed 24 Sep 2011

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Group for Biological Arms Control, Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker Centre for Science and Peace ResearchUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations