Advertisement

In Defence of Discretion

  • Ylva Hasselberg
Chapter
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 39)

Abstract

In this chapter, I consider the idea of research as a calling in contrast to the deprofessionalised research culture that she sees developing. The new professionalism, in the author’s view, lacks the key factor of a value-based standard for good work. Instead, the new professional ethics has as its starting point the rejection of all values except instrumentality. Research and higher education, the last bastions of independent professional judgement, have now also fallen victim to “good governance”. The consequences of the loss of independent judgement in academe are vast, since one of the main justifications for the existence of universities is to train and develop the capacity for professional judgement in all fields.

Keywords

Network Mode Professional Group Academic Freedom Professional Judgement Academic Faculty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Blomqvist, G. (1992). Elfenbenstorn eller statsskepp?: stat, universitet och akademisk frihet i vardag och vision från Agardh till Schück (Bibliotheca historica Lundensis 71). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (2000). Les structures sociales de l’economie. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  4. Brint, S. (1994). In an age of experts: The changing role of professionals in politics and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Johnson, E., & Sjögren, E. (2012). Governing by drugs: The denial of subsidy for viagra use in Sweden. In B. Larsson et al. (Eds.), Transformations of the Swedish welfare state. From social engineering to governance. Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  6. Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Poovey, M. (1998). A history of the modern fact: Problems of knowledge in the science of wealth and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Powell, W. (1991). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organisation. In G. Thompson et al. (Eds.), Markets, hierarchies and networks: The co-ordination of social life. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Svensson, L. G. (2006). New professionalism, trust and competence some conceptual remarks and empirical data. Current Sociology, 54(4), 579–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economic HistoryUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations