Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Coastal Hazards pp 753–780Cite as

The Hazards of Beach Litter

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Coastal Research Library ((COASTALRL,volume 1000))

Abstract

Marine and beach litter include items that have been made and discarded into the marine environment by people. Over the past few decades concern has been growing regarding the amounts of litter that accumulate on beaches and seas. Litter issues have become very widespread of late due to public awareness and concern for environmental issues. Beach litter is sourced from three areas: marine, industrial and domestic wastes dumped at sea and riverine and beach litter. Such debris mars beach enjoyment, has safety implications (e.g. glass, syringes), needs cultural/attitudinal changes in order to reduce and prevent waste reaching both sea, and beaches. Irrespective of source, litter, the main culprit being plastics, is ubiquitous on global beaches and a perennial problem for any coastal manager. Plastics alone amount to some 265m tonnes worldwide much being recreational litter. Current litter policy must be geared to stopping it at source. Recycling plastics is often seen as a panacea to reducing such waste with many countries pushing for higher targets year by year. Current recycling policy is questionable, lacking workable solutions; in effect, a ‘knowledge lag’ exists with money being the inevitable forcing function. Figures from the USA show that just 33.4% of plastics are recycled; work done by WRAP in the UK suggest that 45% is achievable. Comparable and reliable methods to evaluate beach plastic litter are currently the weakest point of this particular scientific community. Marine debris can have serious effects on wildlife and their ecosystems; in some instances, such occurrences will be lethal. Clearly, it is essential that beach litter surveys obtain a representative sample by looking at annual litter counts; baseline studies should identify material types. Litter itself constitutes a serious hazard as shown from a number of previous studies, which suggest environmental quality and public health needs to be considered as key indicators. A universal approach inclusive of stringent regulations, particularly for plastic must be developed; incisive, risk-taking innovative technologies, especially in the chemistry of plastics are needed in order to solve the challenges ahead. In essence, to change the way we think about the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Asfa-Wossen L (2010) Mixed plastics under the lens. Mater World 18(12):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes DKA, Milner P (2005) Drifting plastics and its consequences for sessile organism dispersal in the Atlantic Ocean. Mar Biol 146:815–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes DKA, Sanderson WG (2000) Latitudinal patterns in the colonization of marine debris. In: Proceedings of the 11th international bryozoology conference, Balboa, pp 154–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes DKA, Galgani F, Thompson RC, Barlaz M (2009) Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:1985–1998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean MJ (1987) Legal strategies for reducing persistent plastics in the marine environment. Mar Pollut Bull 18(6B):357–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechara EHH, Stevani CV (2006) Pollution of Brazilian beaches by light stick waste, Outline Research Proposal, Stevani & Stevani Consultores Associados S/C Ltda. R. Manoel Simões da Silva, 47 – Jardim Maria Nazaré, CEP 02354-370, São Paulo, Brasil, 6 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett M (2010) Wheels in motion. Mater World 18(11)

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne MA, Galloway T, Thompson R (2007) Microplastic – an emerging contaminant of potential concern. Integr Environ Assess Manag 3:559–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne MA, Crump P, Niven SJ (2011) Accumulation of microplastic on shorelines worldwide: sources and sinks. Environ Sci Technol 45:9175–9179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe JM, Rogers DD (1997) Marine debris sources, impacts and solutions. Springer, New York, 432 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin CJ, Singh JG (1993) Marine debris contamination of beaches in St. Lucia and Dominica. Mar Pollut Bull 26(6):325–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derraik J (2007) The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Mar Pollut Bull 54:423–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon TR (1995) Temporal trend assessments of the sources, quantities and types of litter occurring on the shores of the United Kingdom: introduction and methods with results from paired observations 8 and 11 years apart on 63 sampling units in mainland Scotland and the Western isles. Marine Litter Research Programme, Stage 7, The Tidy Britain Group, Wigan, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon TJ, Dixon TR (1981) Marine litter distribution and composition in the North Sea. Mar Pollut Bull 14:145–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EA/NALG (Environment Agency and The National Aquatic Litter Group) (2000) Assessment of aesthetic quality of coastal and bathing beaches. Monitoring protocol and classification scheme, 15 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Earll RC, Everard M, Lowe N, Pattinson C, Williams AT (1996) (eds) Measuring and managing litter in rivers, estuaries and coastal waters: a guide to methods, R., Earll Ltd., 78 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Earll RC, Moore J, Williams AT, Tudor DT (1999) The measurement of oily waste and garbage disposed of into the marine environment by shipping. A report to the Maritime and Coastguard Agency. Prepared by Coastal Management for Sustainability, Candle Cottage, Kempley, Glos, UK, 75 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Earll RC, Williams AT, Simmons SL, Tudor DT (2000) Aquatic litter, management and prevention – the role of measurement. J Coast Conserv 6(1):67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery M, Simmonds M (1995) Seal entanglement and rescue options. A report for earthkind. The Conservation Research Group, The University of Greenwich, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Faris J, Hart K (1995) Seas of debris: a summary of the third international conference on marine debris, UNC-SG-95-01. North Carolina Sea Grant, Florida, 54pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrigos MC, Marin ML, Canto A, Sanchez A (2004) Determination of residual styrene monomer in polystyrene granules by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1061:211–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrity SD, Levings SC (1993) Marine debris along the Caribbean coast of Panama. Mar Pollut Bull 26(6):317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert C (1996) The cost to local authorities of coastal and marine pollution – a preliminary appraisal. In: Earll RC (ed) Recent policy developments and the management of coastal pollution. Marine Environmental Management and Training, Candle Cottage, Kempley, Glos, UK, 12–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg ED (1997) Plasticizing the sea-floor: an overview. Environ Technol 18:195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory MR (2009) Environmental implications of plastic debris in marine settings – entanglement, ingestion, smothering, hangers on, hitch hiking and alien invasions. Philos Trans R Soc B 364:2013–2025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall K (1998) Economic and social impacts of marine debris and oil on coastal communities. Stage 1 report, Sept 1998, KIMO and Napier University, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivar do Sul J, Costa M (2007) Marine debris review for Latin America and the wider Caribbean area, and where do we go from here? Mar Pollut Bull 54(8):1087–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivar do Sul JA, Rodrigues O, Santos IR, Fillmann G, Matthiensen A (2009) Skin irritation and histopathologic alterations in rats exposed to lightstick contents, UV radiation and seawater. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 72(7):2020–2024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MM (1995) Fishing debris in the Australian marine environment. Mar Pollut Bull 30(1):25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karapanagioti HK, Klontza I (2008) Testing phenanthrene distribution properties of virgin plastic pellets and plastic eroded pellets found on Lesvos island beaches (Greece). Mar Environ Res 65(4):283–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman J, Brown M (1991) California marine debris action plan. In: Magoon OT, Converse H, Tippie V, Tobin LT Clark D (eds) Coastal zone ’91. Proceedings of the 7th symposium on coastal and ocean management. ASCE, Long Beach, California, New York, USA, 8–12 July 1991, pp 3390–3406

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn PJ, Shackley SE (1996) Effects of mechanical beach-cleaning on invertebrate populations. Br Wildl 7(3):147–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Loretto C (1995) Impacts of litter on wildlife and ecosystems. In: Earll RC (ed) Coastal and riverine litter: problems and effective solutions, Coastal Management for Sustainability, Candle Cottage, Kempley, Glos, UK, pp 3–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas Z (1992) Monitoring persistent litter in the marine environment on Sable Island, Nova Scotia. Mar Pollut Bull 24(4):192–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcilla A, Garia S, Garcia-Quesada JC (2004) Study of the migration of PVC plasticizers. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 71:457–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin V, Misic C, Moreno M, Salvo V-S, Fabiano M (2004) Faecal indicators, bacteria and fungi in beach sediments. In: Micallef A, Vassallo A (eds) Management of coastal recreational resources. First international conference on beaches, yacht marinas and coastal ecotourism, ICOD, University of Malta, pp 107–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Marpol (1973/1978) The international convention for the prevention of pollution from ships, 1973 as modified by the protocol of 1978, Annex V. Prevention of pollution by garbage from ships, entered into force, 31 Dec 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Mato Y, Isobe T, Takada H, Kanehiro H, Ohtake C, Kaminuma T (2001) Plastic resin pellets as a transport medium for toxic chemicals in the marine environment. Environ Sci Technol 35:318–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuoka T, Nakashima T, Nagaswa N (2005) A review of ghost fishing: scientific approaches to evaluation and solutions. Fish Sci 71:691–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley SJ, Bjorndal KA (1999) Conservation implications of dietary dilution from debris ingestion: sub-lethal effects in post-hatching loggerhead sea turtles. Conserv Biol 13:925–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre AD (1990) Sewage in the sea, Annex XII of state of the marine environment, GESAMP reports and studies no. 39

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna J, Williams AT, Cooper JAG (2011) Blue flag: red herring: do beach awards encourage the public to visit beaches? J Tour Manag 32(3):576–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MCS (Marine Conservation Society) (2010) Beachwatch ’09 – nationwide beach clean and survey report, Ross-on-Wye, England, UK, 60 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta R (2009) The maze of mixed plastics recycling. Mater World 17(7):10

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore C (2003) Trashed: across the Pacific Ocean, plastics, plastics, everywhere. Nat Hist 112:46–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers A (2007) What comes around: breaking the cycle of plastics in the ocean. Ocean Conservancy, Autumn

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash A (1992) Impacts of marine debris on subsistence fishermen – an exploratory study. Mar Pollut Bull 24:150–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson C, Williams AT (1997) Bathing water quality and health implications. In: Rajar R, Brebbia CA (eds) Water pollution IV. Modelling, measuring and prediction. Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton, MEDCOAST Secretariat, Middle East Technical Univeristy, pp 175–183

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council) (2008) Tackling marine debris in the 21st century, Communications on the effectiveness of national and international measures to prevent and reduce marine debris and its impacts

    Google Scholar 

  • OC (Ocean Conservancy) (2009) A rising tide of ocean debris… and what we can do about it, Ocean Conservancy, 1330, 19th street NW, Washington, DC, 20036, USA, 64 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Oigman-Pszczol SS, Creed JC (2007) Quantification and classification of marine litter on beaches along Armãçao dos Búzios, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Coast Res 23(2):421–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldridge S (1992) Bathing water quality: a local authority perspective. In: Kay D (ed) Recreational water quality management, vol 1, Coastal waters. Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, pp 33–47, 220 pp. ISBN ISBN 0-13-770025-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Olin R, Carlsson B, Stahre B (1995) The west coast of Sweden – the rubbish tip of the North Sea. In: Earll RC (ed) Coastal and riverine litter: problems and effective solutions, Coastal Management for Sustainability, Candle Cottage, Kempley, Glos, UK, pp 12–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipp R (1993) Community needlestick accidents and trends in environmental quality. Public Health 107:363–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philipp R, Hodgkinson G (1994) The management of health and safety hazards in tourist resorts. Int J Occup Environ Health 7(3):207–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipp R, Pond K, Rees G (1995) A study of litter and medical waste on the UK coastline. Health Hyg 16:3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilz H, Brandt B, Fehringer R (2010) The impacts of plastics on life energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions in Europe, Denkstatt summary report, denkstatt GmbH Hietzinger HauptstraBe 28. 1130 Vienna, Austria, 45 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Plastics Europe (2011) Plasticseurope/documents/plastics (accessed 4 Nov 2011); and Plastics; the Facts, 2011. An analysis of European plastic production, demand and recovery for 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard S (1996) Beachwatch ’96. 1995 Nationwide beach-clean and survey report. The Marine Conservation Society, Ross-on-Wye

    Google Scholar 

  • Redahan E (2011) Making the most of a mixed bag. Mater World 19(7):9

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees G, Pond K (1995a) Impacts: aesthetics, health and physical clearance. In: Earll RC (ed) Coastal and riverine litter: problems and effective solutions, Coastal Management for Sustainability, Candle Cottage, Kempley, Glos, UK, pp 5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees G, Pond K (1995b) Marine litter monitoring programmes – a review of methods with special reference to national surveys. Mar Pollut Bull 30(2):103–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribic CA (1998) Use of indicator items to monitor marine debris on a New Jersey beach from 1991–1996. Mar Pollut Bull 36(11):887–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan PG (2008) Seabirds indicate changes in the compositiion of plastic litter in the Atlantic and south western Indian oceans. Mar Pollut Bull 56(8):1406–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan PG, Connell AD, Gardner BD (1988) Plastic ingestion and PCBs in seabirds: is there a relationship? Mar Pollut Bull 19(4):174–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos IR, Friedrich AC, Barretto FB (2005) Overseas garbage pollution on beaches in northeast Brasil. Mar Pollut Bull 50:778–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva JS, Barbosa SCT, Costa MF (2008) Flag items as a tool for monitoring solid wastes from users on urban beaches. J Coast Res 24(4):890–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva-Iňiguez L, Fisher DW (2003) Quantification and classification of marine litter on the municipal beaches of Ensenada, Baja California. Mar Pollut Bull 46(1):132–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons SL, Williams AT (1993) Persistent marine debris along the Glamorgan Heritage Coast, UK: a management problem. In: Sterr H, Hofstide J, Plag P (eds) Interdisciplinary discussions of coastal research and coastal management: issues and problems. Peter Lang, Frankfurt, pp 240–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanabe S, Watanabe M, Minh TB, Kunisue T, Nakanishi S, Ono H (2004) PCDFs and coplanar PCBs in albatrosses from the North Pacific and southern oceans: levels, patterns and toxicological implications. Environ Sci Technol 38:403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RC, Olsen Y, Mitchell RP, Davis A, Rowland SJ, John AWG, McGonigle D, Russell AE (2004) Lost at sea: where does all the plastic go? Science 304:838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomas J, Guitert R, Mateo R, Raga JA (2002) Marine debris ingestion in loggerhead sea turtles, Caretta caretta, from the western Mediterranean. Mar Pollut Bull 44(3):211–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor DT, Williams AT (2004) Development of a ‘matrix scoring technique’ to determine litter sources at a Bristol Channel beach. J Coast Conserv 10(1–2):119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tudor DT, Williams AT, Randerson P, Ergin A, Earll R (2002) The use of multivariate statistical techniques to establish beach debris pollution sources. J Coast Res 36:716–725

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (United Nations Environemnet Programme) (2009) Marine litter a global challenge. www.marine-litter.gpa.unep.org/facts/facts.htm. Accessed 7 Jan 2011

  • Uneputty P, Evans SM (1997) The impact of plastic debris on the biota of tidal flats in Ambon (Eastern Indonesia). Mar Environ Res 44(3):233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of Surrey (1987) The public health implications of sewage pollution of bathing water. The Robens Institute of Industrial and Environmental Safety, Guildford, England, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Valle-Levinson A, Swanson RL (1991) Wind-induced scattering of medically-related and sewage-related flotables. Mar Technol Soc J 25(2):49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Velander K, Mocagni M (1999) Beach litter sampling strategies: is there a ‘best’ method? Mar Pollut Bull 38(12):1134–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Saal FS, Hughes C (2005) An extensive new literature concerning low-dose effects of bisphenol A shows the need for a new risk assessment. Environ Health Perspect 113:926–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker TR, Reid K, Arnould JPY, Croxall JP (1997) Marine debris surveys at Bird Island, South Georgia 1990–1995. Mar Pollut Bull 34(1):61–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward J, Shumway S (2004) Separating the grain from the chaff: particle selection in suspension- and deposit-feeding bivalves. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 300:83–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting SD (1998) Types and sources of marine debris in Fog Bay, Northern Australia. Mar Pollut Bull 36(11):904–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organisation) (2000) Monitoring bathing waters. A practical guide to the design and implementation of assessments and monitoring programmes. E&FN Spon, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organisation) (2003) Guidelines for safe recreational water environments, vol 1, Coastal and freshwaters. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Widmer WM, Henneman MC (2010) Beach debris in the island of Santa Catarina, south Brazil: spatial patterns, composition and biological aspects. J Coast Res 26(6):993–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams AT (2011) Definitions and typologies of coastal tourism destinations. In: Andrew J, Phillips M (eds) Disappearing destinations: climate change and future challenges for coastal tourism. CABI, Wallingford, pp 47–66

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams AT, Simmons SL (1997) Estuarine litter at the river/beach interface in the Bristol Channel, UK. J Coast Res 13(4):1159–1165

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams AT, Tudor DT (2001) Tudor. Litter burial and exhumation: spatial and temporal distribution on a pocket pebble beach. Mar Pollut Bull 42(11):1031–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams AT, Tudor DT (2006) The question of dogs on beaches. Shore Beach 74(4):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams AT, Pond K, Tudor DT, Jansen H, HongBin Liu (1999) The robustness of litter transect data collection by different survey groups. In: Ozhan E (ed) Proceedings of the MEDCOAST 9 – EMECS 99 Joint conference: land ocean interactions – managing coastal ecosystems, 715–726, MEDCOAST, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams AT, Pond K, Phillipp R (2000) Aesthetic aspects, Ch. 12. In: Bartram J, Rees G (eds) Monitoring bathing waters. E&F N Spon, London, Oxon, England, UK, pp 283–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston JE, Gregory MR, Stevens LM (1997) Encrusters, epibionts, and other biota associated with pelagic plastics: a review of biogeographical, environmental and conservation issues. In: Coe JM, Rogers DB (eds) Marine debris: sources, impacts and solutions. Springer, New York, pp 81–97

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • www.PWMI.or.jp. An introduction to plastic recycling in Japan

  • www.WRAP.org.UK. Accessed 11 Aug 2011

  • www.apme.org. Accessed 15 Dec 2010

  • www.bpf.co.uk. Accessed 15 Dec 2010

  • www.plasticwaste.co.uk. Accessed 15 Dec 2010

  • www.sca.com. Accessed 19 Jan 2011

  • www.sita.co.uk. Accessed 19 Jan 2011

  • www.pafa.org.uk. Accessed 19 Jan 2011

  • www.vrtek.com.au. Accessed 15 Dec 2010

  • www.wales.gov.uk/newsroom/environmentandcountryside/2010/101130carrierbag/?lang=en. Accessed Dec 2010

  • www.theplastiki.com. Accessed 31 Dec 2010

  • YRLMP (1991) Yorkshire Rivers Litter Monitoring Project, 1991. Devised by the Tidy Britain group and sponsored by the national rivers authority, 12 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Built & Natural Environment, Swansea Metropolitan University, Swansea, SA1 6ED, Wales, UK

    A. T. Williams & M. J. Cullis

  2. e-GEO Centro de Estudos de Geografia e Planeamento Regional, Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

    A. T. Williams

  3. Robens Centre for Public and Environmental Health, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK

    K. Pond

  4. Civil Engineering Department, Middle East Technical Univeristy, Ankara, Turkey

    A. Ergin

  5. University of Surrey, Guildford, UK

    M. J. Cullis

  6. Middle East Technical Univeristy, Ankara, Turkey

    M. J. Cullis

Authors
  1. A. T. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Pond
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Ergin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. J. Cullis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. J. Cullis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Geosciences, Florida Atlantic University, Glades Road 777, Boca Raton, 33431, USA

    Charles W. Finkl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, A.T., Pond, K., Ergin, A., Cullis, M.J. (2013). The Hazards of Beach Litter. In: Finkl, C. (eds) Coastal Hazards. Coastal Research Library, vol 1000. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5234-4_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation