Abstract

This chapter sets out the general project undertaken throughout the following six chapters. It identifies what can be considered the ontological dimension of colonialism, a dimension many postcolonial critics fail to recognize. Insofar as that is the case, the argument is made that the emancipatory motivation behind postcolonial discourse and practice does not achieve its ends. In order to move postcolonial criticism forward, an interrogation of the ontology of empire must be undertaken. This interrogation is precisely what Mehta’s postcolonial hermeneutics sets out to accomplish. Negotiating Heideggerian and post-Heideggerian hermeneutics, Mehta’s work shows how the Western philosophical tradition has been committed to a “metaphysics of presence.” The metaphysics of presence reduces alterity to identity. Such totalizing philosophical gestures underwrite the colonial project. Mehta’s work demonstrates how a deconstruction of the metaphysics of presence not only delimits the reach of Western culture but also how it opens up new vistas for viewing classical Hindu traditions. Mehta’s novel interpretation of Hinduism provides a point of contestation regarding the dominant models in twentieth and twenty-first century Continental philosophy.

Keywords

Comparative Philosophy Continental Philosophy Philosophical Hermeneutic Transcendental Subjectivity Hindu Tradition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bhattacharyya, Krishnachandra. 1954 [1929]. Swaraj in ideas. The Visvabharati Quaterly 20: 103–114.Google Scholar
  2. Bongmba, Elias K. 2000. African witchcraft and otherness. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  3. Breckenridge, Carol A., and Peter van der Veer (eds.). 1993. Orientalism and the postcolonial predicament: Perspectives on South Asia. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dallmayr, Fred. 1996. Beyond orientalism: Essays on cross-cultural encounter. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dallmayr, Fred. 1998. Alternative visions: Paths in the global village. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  6. Derrida, Jacques. 1984. Of an apocalyptic tone recently adopted in philosophy. Oxford Literary Review 6(2): 3–37.Google Scholar
  7. Ellis, Thomas B. 2008a. The meta-ethics of viraha bhakti in the philosophical writings of J. L. Mehta. Journal of Vaishnava Studies 16(2): 71–91.Google Scholar
  8. Ellis, Thomas B. 2008b. Review of Wei Zhang, Heidegger, Rorty, and the eastern thinkers: A hermeneutic of cross-cultural encounter. Sophia 47: 253–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellis, Thomas B. 2010. On the death of the pilgrim: The postcolonial hermeneutics of Jarava Lal Mehta. In Postcolonial philosophy of religion, ed. Purushottama Bilimoria and Andrew B. Irvine, 105–120. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Flood, Gavin. 1996. An introduction to Hinduism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1989. Truth and method, 2nd rev. ed., Trans. J. Weinsheimer and D.G. Marshall. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Halbfass, Wilhelm. 1988. India and Europe: An essay in understanding. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  13. Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  14. Levinas, Emmanuel. 1986. Ethics and infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo. Trans. A. Cohen Richard. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Li, Chenyang. 1999. The Tao encounters the West: Explorations in comparative philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Trans. G. Bennington and B. Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Panikkar, Raimundo. 1980. Aporias in the comparative philosophy of religion. Man and World 13: 357–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Panikkar, Raimundo. 1988. What is comparative philosophy comparing? In Interpreting across boundaries: New essays in comparative philosophy, ed. Gerald J. Larson and Eliot Deutsch, 116–136. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Serequeberhan, Tsenay. 1994. The hermeneutics of African philosophy: Horizon and discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Spanos, William V. 1996. Culture and colonization: The imperial imperatives of the centered circle. Boundary 2 23(1): 135–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Taylor, Mark C. 1986a. Masking: Domino effect. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 54(3): 547–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Taylor, Mark C. 1986b. Orthodox-y (-) mending. Thought 61(240): 162–171.Google Scholar
  23. Zhang, Wei. 2006. Heidegger, Rorty, and the eastern thinkers: A hermeneutics of cross-cultural understanding. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and ReligionAppalachian State UniversityBooneUSA

Personalised recommendations