Advertisement

Pseudo-Dionysius and the Negation of Models of God

  • Nancy J. Shaffer
Chapter

Abstract

Pseudo-Dionysius, the pseudonymous fifth or sixth century philosopher and theologian, holds that God is unknowable and that people do not have the capacity to describe God. The doctrine of divine transcendence, and the resulting mystery of God, is rooted in Neoplatonistism and is called apophatic theology. Deeply suspicious of the limitations of human thought, it maintains that the only absolutely true statements about God are negative ones. But Dionysius’ understanding of mystical union with God is clearly distinct from a Neoplatonic intellectual ascent. The created order is validated, rather than negated, and the return to the divine is achieved through grace instead of intellectual ascent. In light of both his creative use of Neoplatonic philosophy and his essential orthodoxy, it is no wonder that Pseudo-Dionysius has enjoyed such influence. His unique model of God stands at the beginning of a significant branch of Christian theology, the via negativa.

Keywords

Christian Theology Negative Theology Divine Essence Mystical Union Ontological Substance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Suggested Readings

  1.  1.Gilson, Etienne. 1952. Being and some philosophers, 2nd ed. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.Google Scholar
  2.  2.Golitzin, Alexander. 1993. The mysticism of Dionysius Areopagita: Platonist or Christian? Mystics Quarterly 19(3): 98–114.Google Scholar
  3.  3.Golitzin, Alexander. 1994. Et Introibo Ad Altare Dei: The mystagogy of Dionysius Areopagita, with special reference to its predecessors in the eastern Christian tradition. Thessaloniki: George Dedousis.Google Scholar
  4.  4.Hathaway, R.F. 1969. Hierarchy and the definition of order in the letters of Pseudo-Dionysius. The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5.  5.Lossky, Vladimir. 1931. La notion des ‘Analogies’ chez Denys le Pseudo-Areopagite. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et litteraire du Moyen Age 5: 279–309.Google Scholar
  6.  6.Lossky, Vladimir. 1975. In the image and likeness of God. London/Oxford: Mowbrays.Google Scholar
  7.  7.Luibheid, Colm (trans.). 1987. Pseudo-Dionysius: The complete works. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  8.  8.Niarchos, C. 1985. The concept of participation according to Proclus, with reference to the criticism of Nicolaus of Methone. Diotima 13: 78–94.Google Scholar
  9.  9.Plotinus. 1969. Enneads. Trans. S. MacKenna. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  10. 10.Pseudo-Dionysius. 1987. Pseudo-Dionysius: The complete works. Trans. Colm Luibheid. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.Rahner, Karl, and Herbert Vorgrimler. 1985. Dictionary of theology. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
  12. 12.Rist, John M. 1964a. Eros and psyche: Studies in Plato, Plotinus, and Origen. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.Rist, John M. 1964b. Mysticism and transcendence in later neoplatonism. Hermes 92: 213–225.Google Scholar
  14. 14.Rist, John M. 1967. Plotinus: The road to reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.Roques, Rene. 1932. Contemplation, extase, et tenebre chez le Pseudo-Denys. In Dictionaire de Spiritualite. Paris: Beauchesne.Google Scholar
  16. 16.Roques, Rene. 1954. De l’implication de meehodes theologiques chez le Pseudo-Denys. Revue d’ascetique et de mystique 30: 268–274.Google Scholar
  17. 17.Roques, Rene. 1957. Symbolisme et theologie negative chez le Ps.-Denys. Bulletin de l’association Guillaume Bude, 97–112.Google Scholar
  18. 18.Roques, Rene. 1961. Y propos des sources du Pseudo-Denys. Revue d Histoire Ecclesiastique 56: 449–464.Google Scholar
  19. 19.Roques, Rene. 1970. Introduction. La Hierarchie Celeste, Sources Chretiennes 58, 2nd ed., v–xcvi. Paris: Janvier.Google Scholar
  20. 20Rorem, Paul. 1984. Biblical and liturgical symbols within the Pseudo-Dionysian synthesis. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.Google Scholar
  21. 21.Rorem, Paul. 1988. The uplifting spirituality of Pseudo-Dionysius. In Christian spirituality: Origins to the twelfth century, ed. B. McGinn, J. Meyendorff, and J. LeClercq. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyCalifornia University of PennsylvaniaCaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations