Advertisement

Heidegger and Gandhi: A Dialogue on Conflict and Enmity

  • Gregory Fried
Chapter
Part of the Boston Studies in Philosophy, Religion and Public Life book series (BSPR, volume 1)

Abstract

While Heidegger and Gandhi share the conviction that conflict is an inevitable feature of the human condition, they differ on what that conflict entails and what it may accomplish. For Gandhi, human finitude means that any individual and any culture will have only a partial perspective on the truth, whether in religious matters or in questions of justice, and therefore conflict is the necessary result of these differences. Although Heidegger also argues that we are finite beings, he would disagree with Gandhi’s view that we may critique ourselves and our institutions in the light of a truth that, if only partially glimpsed, transcends our particularity. For Heidegger, there is no transcendence to a world of timeless principles and ideals, only the immanence of historical belonging. This means that while Heidegger believes that conflict plays a role in refining a community’s sense of its own historical destiny, he would condemn as nihilism Gandhi’s view that conflict can invite us to transcend ourselves. For Heidegger, genuine conflict reveals the opponents as incommensurable enemies; for Gandhi, the goal of conflict must always be the possibility of reconciliation, and conflict must unfold in a way to promote this. The essay argues that Gandhi’s position on what I call soft enmity offers a more promising understanding of the dialectic between our rootedness in historical traditions and our need to judge those traditions by standards that go beyond them.

Keywords

Constructive Conflict National Independence Conversational Exchange Western Metaphysic Historical Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

 I gratefully acknowledge the comments and critiques of Richard Polt and Joseph Prabhu, who read early drafts of this essay.

References

  1. Arendt H (1978) Martin Heidegger at eighty. In: Murray M (ed) Heidegger and modern philosophy. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 293–303Google Scholar
  2. Bachman A (1997) Theories of succession. Philos Public Aff 26(1):31–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bondurant J (1965) Conquest of violence: the Gandhian philosophy of conflict. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  4. Capobianco R (2010) Engaging Heidegger. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  5. Eisikovits N (2010) Sympathizing with the enemy: reconciliation, transitional justice, negotiation. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  6. Fried G (2000) Heidegger’s polemos: from being to politics. Yale University Press, New Haven CTGoogle Scholar
  7. Fried G (2006) Back to the cave: a platonic rejoinder to Heidegger. In: Hyland D, Manoussakis JP (eds) Heidegger and the Greeks. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  8. Gandhi MK (1957) An autobiography: the story of my experiments with truth. Beacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  9. Gandhi MK (1962) In search of the supreme, vol II. Navajivan Publishing House, AhmedabadGoogle Scholar
  10. Gandhi K (1982) All men are brothers: autobiographical reflections. Continuum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Gandhi R (2003) Essential writings of Mahatma Gandhi. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Heidegger M (1959) Gelassenheit. Verlag Günther Neske, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  13. Heidegger M (1962) Being and time. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Heidegger M (1969) Discourse on thinking, 1st edn. Harper Torchbooks, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Heidegger M (1989) In: von Herrmann F-W (ed) Beiträge zur Philosophy, Gesamtausgabe, vol 65. Frankfurt am Main, Vittorio KlostermannGoogle Scholar
  16. Heidegger M (1991) The self-assertion of the German University. In: Wolin R (ed) The Heidegger controversy: a critical reader. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Heidegger M (2010) Being and truth. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  18. Huntington S (1993) The clash of civilizations? Foreign Aff 72(3):22–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huntington S (1996) The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Hyland D (2006) Heidegger and the Greeks: interpretive essays. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. Margalit A, Raz J (1990) National self-determination. J Philos 87(9):439–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller D (1997) On nationality. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murray M (1978) Heidegger and modern philosophy: critical essays. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  24. Parkes G (1987) Heidegger and Asian thought. University of Hawaii Press, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  25. Polt R (2006) The emergency of being: on Heidegger’s contributions to philosophy. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  26. Schneeberger G (1962) Nachlese zu Heidegger. Suhr, BernGoogle Scholar
  27. Watkins C (1985) The American heritage dictionary of Indo-European roots. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySuffolk UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations