Preparing Teachers for Early Childhood Science Teaching

  • Wolff-Michael Roth
  • Maria Inês Mafra Goulart
  • Katerina Plakitsi
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 6)


In this chapter, we present a teacher training program for the realization of the perspectives and the limitations of a CHAT approach. We analyze the curriculum scene as a matter of activity and trace the potentialities and limitations of the concept of activity|activism to become the central organized cell in|for early childhood teacher training programs. In the program exemplifying our approach, the development of communicative skills, collaborative and creative work, problem solving, and critical thinking is among the priorities of the curriculum planning and development. In|for early grades, learning and knowing different subjects – for example, language, mathematics, studies of the environment, drama, music, and physical education – are not considered as independent fields but as resources that are mobilized in integrated activity. In this program, preservice early childhood teachers are familiarized with different types of learning environments – for example, labs, schools, museums, and environmental parks. They also adapt and adopt analytical methods of the interactions when science education occurs. They are trained to analyze children’s arguments as well as the use of childhood daily cultural tools, as cartoon animations. Dealing with scientific concepts with the aid of a popular cartoon character contributes to better understanding of science, connecting with cultural knowledge, and building a strong interactive network in order to achieve meaningful learning.


Early Childhood Science Education Preservice Teacher Prospective Teacher Future Teacher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Husserl, E. (1939). Die Frage nach dem Ursprung der Geometrie als intentional-historisches Problem. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 1, 203–225.Google Scholar
  2. Mwanza, D. (2001). Where theory meets practice: A case for an activity theory based methodology to guide computer system design. In M. Hirose (Ed.), Human computer interaction ‘01 (pp. 342–349). Amsterdam: Ios Press.Google Scholar
  3. Roth, W.-M. (1998). Designing communities. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Roth, W.-M. (2010a). Activism: A category for theorizing learning. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 10, 278–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Roth, W.-M., & Radford, L. (2010). Re/thinking the zone of proximal development (symmetrically). Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Roth, W.-M., & Radford, L. (2011). A cultural-historical perspective on mathematics teaching and learning. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Vygotskij, L. S. (2005). Psykhologiya razvitiya cheloveka [Psychology of human development]. Moscow: Eksmo.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolff-Michael Roth
    • 1
  • Maria Inês Mafra Goulart
    • 2
  • Katerina Plakitsi
    • 3
  1. 1.Griffith Institute for Educational ResearchGriffith UniversityMt GravattAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisBelo HorizonteBrazil
  3. 3.School of EducationUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece

Personalised recommendations