Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrating Agroecology with Payments for Ecosystem Services in Santa Catarina’s Atlantic Forest

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Governing the Provision of Ecosystem Services

Part of the book series: Studies in Ecological Economics ((SEEC,volume 4))

Abstract

There are no longer acceptable trade-offs between agriculture and ecosystem services: Both are essential and at risk. Agroecology may be uniquely capable of providing both. However, there are real costs to promoting agroecology that someone must pay, but any payment scheme must recognize that many of the services provided as well as the resources required to provide them are both public goods. Payments to individual farmers do little to provide these services, especially if they are contingent upon provision. Public sector investments are required. Since the public goods provided by these investments cross political boundaries, payments for these investments should flow from those governments or collective institutions that benefit to those that will provide the services, supplementing resources invested by the latter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The true açai palm (Euterpe oleracea) is found farther to the north, but we will refer to the fruit of E. edulis by its market name.

  2. 2.

    Note that Homma is referring to Euterpe oleracea, native to northern Brazil. However, Euterpe edulis, native to southern Brazil, is quite similar. All other references are to E. edulis.

  3. 3.

    The error many economists make is confusing abundance with non-rivalry. For example, oxygen is currently abundant in the sense that my use does not affect your use, but it is also rival, because my use of oxygen transforms it into CO2, leaving less for you to breath. When oxygen becomes scarce, such as when miners are trapped in a cave-in, the rivalry becomes obvious, but in normal conditions of abundance, it appears non-rival. The physical characteristic of oxygen as a rival resource cannot be affected by policy.

  4. 4.

    Annex I countries, which are the industrialised nations, required to reduce emissions (UNFCCC 1998).

References

  • Alston, J. M., Marra, M. C., Pardey, P. G., & Wyatt, T. J. (2000). Research returns redux: A meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 44, 185–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A. (2002). Agroecology: The science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 93, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anido, R. N. M. (2002). Caracterização hidrológica em uma microbacia experimental visando identi­ficar indicadores de monitoramento ambiental (p. 69). Agriculture. Universidade de São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcova, F. C. S., Cicco, V., & Rocha, P. A. (2003). Precipitação efetiva e interceptação das chuvas por floresta de Mata Atlântica em uma microbacia experimental em Cunha. Revista Arvore, 27, 257–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmford, A., Bruner, A., Cooper, P., Constanza, R., Farber, S., Green, R. E., Jenkins, M., Jefferiss, P., Jessamy, V., Madden, J., Munro, K., Myers, N., Naeem, S., Paavola, J., Rayment, M., Rosendo, S., Roughgarden, J., Trumper, K. and Turner, R. K. (2002). Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science, 297, 950–953.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barboza, R. S. C. (2007). aracterização das Bacias Aéreas e Avaliação da Chuva Oculta nos Contrafortes da Serra do Mar – RJ. Rio de Janeiro: UFRRJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batáry, P., Báldi, A., Kleijn, D., & Tscharntke, T. (2011). Landscape-moderated biodiversity effects of agri-environmental management: A meta-analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 1894–1902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, R. M., & Smart, M. (2002). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: International lessons for developing countries. World Development, 30, 899–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bittencourt, M. C. (2007). Avaliação de serviços ambientais gerados por unidades de produção familiar participantes do programmea Proambiente no estado do Pará – Jaguariúna. Embrapa Meio Ambiente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, T., & Balmford, A. (1996). Atlantic forest extinctions. Nature, 380, 115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campello, E. F., Silva, G. T. A., Nobrega, P. O., Vieira, A. L. M., Franco, A. A., & Resende, A. S. (2007). Sistemas Agroflorestais na Mata Atlântica: a experiência da Embrapa Agrobiologia (Circular Técnica 2). Seropédica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavelier, J., Solis, D., & Jaramilo, M. A. (1996). Fog interception in Montane forest across the central cordillera of Panamá. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 12, 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G., & Heal, G. (Eds.). (2000). Environmental markets. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, Y., Barkmann, J., Juhrbandt, J., Kessler, M., Wanger, T. C., Anshary, A., Buchori, D., Cicuzza, D., Darras, K., Putra, D. D., Erasmi, S., Pitopang, R., Schmidt, C., Schulze, C. H., Seidel, D., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Stenchly, K., Vidal, S., Weist, M., Wielgoss, A. C., & Tscharntke, T. (2011). Combining high biodiversity with high yields in tropical agroforests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 8311–8316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, L. P., Leite, Y. L. R., Mendes, S. L., & Ditchfield, A. D. (2005). Mammal conservation in Brazil. Conservation Biology, 19, 672–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva, J. M. C., & Tabarelli, M. (2000). Tree species impoverishment and the future flora of the Atlantic forest of northeast Brazil. Nature, 404, 72–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H., & Farley, J. (2010). Ecological economics: Principles and applications (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantas, I. (2010). Brazil interest rates to consumers rise, credit jumps. Bloomberg. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-11-29/brazil-interest-rates-to-consumers-rise-credit-jumps-update1-.html. Accessed Oct 2012.

  • De Schutter, O. (2010). Report submitted by the special Rapporteur on the right to food. New York: United Nations Human Right Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defesa Civil Santa Catarina. (2010). Enchentes 2008. On-line: http://www.desastre.sc.gov.br/. Accessed Oct 2012.

  • EMBRAPA (Ed.). (2006). Bovinocultura. Coeficientes técnicos, custos, rendimentos e rentabilidade. Sistemas de Produção, 4 - 2ª Edição. Embrapa Amazônia Oriental.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, S., Pagiola, S., & Wunder, S. (2008). Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65, 663–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fadden, J. M. (2005). A Produção de açaí a partir do processamento dos frutos do palmiteiro (Euterpe edulis Martius) na Mata Atlântica. Agronomia. Florianópolis: UFSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2011). How to feed the world in 2050. On line:http://www.scp-knowledge.eu/sites/default/files/knowledge/attachments/How%20to%20Feed%20the%20World%20in%202050.pdf. Accessed Oct 2012.

  • Farber, S. C., Costanza, R., & Wilson, M. A. (2002). Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 41, 375–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faria, A., & Marques, J. (1999). O Desaparecimento de pequenos rios brasileiros. Ciência Hoje, 25, 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J., & Costanza, R. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services: From the local to the global. Ecological Economics, 69, 2060–2068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J., Schmitt F, A., Alvez, J. P., & Rebola, P. M. (2010a). The farmer’s viewpoint: Payments for ecosystem services and agroecologic pasture based dairy production. Advances in Animal Biosciences, 1, 490–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J., Aquino, A., Daniels, A., Moulaert, A., Lee, D., & Krause, A. (2010b). Global mechanisms for sustaining and enhancing PES schemes. Ecological Economics, 69, 2075–2084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J., Aquino, A., Daniels, A., Moulaert, A., Lee, D., & Krause, A. (2010c). Global mechanisms for sustaining and enhancing PES schemes. Ecological Economics, 69, 2075–2084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J., Schmitt Filho, A., Alvez, J., & Ribeiro de Freitas, N., Jr. (2011). How valuing nature can transform agriculture. Solutions, 2, 64–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • FATMA. ( n.d.). Parque Estadual da Serra do Tabuleiro Fundacao do Meio Ambiente, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, P. J., & Kiss, A. (2002). Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science, 298, 1718–1719.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 16, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, B. (1995). Uma abordagem para o Gerenciamento Ambiental da Bacia Hidrográfica do Rio Itajaí, com ênfase no Problema Enchentes. Engenharia. Florianópolis: UFSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitas, L. A. S. (2008). A Construção Participativa de Arranjos Silvipastoris em São Bonifácio – SC (p. 123). Zootechnology. Florianópolis: UFSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman, S. R. (2000). Agroecology: Ecological processes in sustainable agriculture. Boca Raton: CRC Press LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman, S. (2007). Agroecology: The ecology of sustainable food syste. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homma, A. K. O., Nogueira, O. L., Menezes, A. J. E. A., Carvalho, J. E. U., Nicoli, C. M. L., & Matos, G. B. (2006). Açaí: Novos Desafios e Tendências Amazônia: Ciencias & Desenvolvimento. Belém, 1, 7–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAASTD. (2008). Executive summary of the synthesis report of the international assessment of agricultural knowledge, science and technology for development (IAASTD). Available on http://www.agassessment.org. Available on http://www.agassessment.org. Accessed Oct 2012.

  • IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A., Gaston, K. J., & Balmford, A. (2001). Can we afford to conserve biodiversity? BioScience, 51, 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, M., Scherr, S. J., & Inbar, M. (2004). Markets for biodiversity services: Potential roles and challenges. Environment, 46, 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemkes, R. J. (2008). Policy tool choice for ecosystem service provision: Payments and public information. Masters thesis, Community Development and Applied Economics. University of Vermont, Burlington.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D. M., & Kuch, P. J. (2003). Will nutrient credit trading ever work? An assessment of supply and demand problems and institutional obstacles. Environmental Law Reporter, 33, 10352–10368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubiszewski, I., Farley, J., & Costanza, R. (2010). The production and allocation of information as a good that is enhanced with increased use. Ecological Economics, 69, 1344–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landell-Mills, N., & Porras, I. T. (2002). Silver bullet or fools’ gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance, W. F. (1999). Reflections on the tropical deforestation crisis. Biological Conservation, 91, 109–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzi, A. (2003). Desempenho animal e produção de forragem em dois sistemas de uso da pastagem: Pastejo Contínuo & Pastoreio Racional Voisin (p. 122). Zootechnology. Florianópolis: UFSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limburg, K. E., O’Neill, R. V., Costanza, R., & Farber, S. (2002). Complex systems and valuation. Ecological Economics, 41, 409–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, R., & Galinato, G. I. (2007). Should governments stop subsidies to private goods? Evidence from rural Latin America. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1071–1094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (2001). Island biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten, G. G. (1988). Productivity, stability, sustainability, equitability and autonomy as properties for agroecosystem assessment. Agricultural Systems, 26, 291–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, P., & Trovatto, C. (Eds.). (2008). Manual Agroflorestal para a Mata Atlântica. Brasília: Ministério de Desenvolvimento Agrário.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, P. H., Bohrer, C. B., Tanizaki, K., Dubois, J. C. L., Landi, M. P. M., Campagnani, S., Neto, S. N. O., & Vinha, V. G. d. (2005). Sistemas Agroflorestais e Reflorestamento para Captura de Carbono e Geração de Renda. CPDA-UFRRJ. On-line at http://www.ecoeco.org.br/conteudo/publicacoes/encontros/vi_en/mesa2/Sistemas_agroflorestais_e_Carbono.pdf. Accessed Oct 2012.

  • Mea, M. E. A. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meister, K., & Salviati, V. (2009). O Investimento Privado e a Restauração da Mata Atlântica no Brasil. Revista Intertox de Toxicologia, Risco Ambiental e Sociedade, 2, 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melado, J. (2000). Manejo de Pastagem Ecológica – Um Conceito Para o Terceiro Milênio. Viçosa: Aprenda Fácil Editora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melado, J. (2007). Pastagem Ecológica e serviços ambientais da pecuária sustentável. Revista Brasileria de Agroecologia, 2, 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, J. P., Martensen, A. C., Dixo, M., Bernacci, L. C., Ribeiro, M. C., Teixeira, A. M. G., & Pardini, R. (2009). Time-lag in biological responses to landscape changes in a highly dynamic Atlantic forest region. Biological Conservation, 142, 1166–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, J. P. (2010). O Código Florestal tem base científica? Conservação e Natureza, 8, 92–99 (preface).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, J. P., Lewinsohn, T. M., Joly, C. A., Verdade, L. M., Martinelli, L. A., & Rodrigues, R. R. (2010). Brazilian law: Full speed in reverse? Science, 329, 276–277.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ministério do Meio Ambiente. (2011). In S. d. B. e. Florestas (Ed.), Relatório de Inspeçã:o Área atingida pela tragédia das chuvas: Região Serrana do Rio de Janeiro: Áreas de Preservação Permanente e Unidades de Conservação & Áreas de Risco: O que uma coisa tem a ver com a outra?. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N., & May, P. (2010). Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 69, 1202–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M., Jr. (1969). The principle of “Fiscal Equivalence”: The division of responsibilities among different levels of government. The American Economic Review, 59, 479–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco, P. (2009). Brasil lidera uso mundial de agrotóxicos. São Paulo: O Estadão de S. Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagiola, S., Agostini, P., Gobbi, J., Haan, C. d., & Ibrahim, M. (2004). Paying for biodiversity conservation services in agricultural landscapes (Environment Department Paper No. 96). Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagiola, S., Bishop, J., & Landell-Mills, N. (Eds.). (2002). Selling forest environmental services. Market-based mechanisms for conservation and development. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagiola, S., Ramírez, E., Gobbi, J., de Haan, C., Ibrahim, M., Murgueitio, E., & Ruíz, J. P. (2007a). Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua. Ecological Economics, 64, 374–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagiola, S., Ramirez, E., Gobbi, J., Dehaan, C., Ibrahim, M., Murgueitio, E., & Ruiz, J. (2007b). Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua*. Ecological Economics, 64, 374–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. (2007). Do we really care about biodiversity? Environmental and Resource Economics, 37, 313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro Machado, L. C. (2004). Pastoreio racional voisin: tecnologia agroecológica para o terceiro milênio. Porto Alegre: Cinco Continentes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. N., Noble, A. D., Bossio, D., Dixon, J., Hine, R. E., Vries, F. W. T. P., & Morison, J. I. L. (2005). Resource-conserving agriculture increases yields in developing countries. Environmental Science & Technology, 40, 1114–1119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribon, R., Simon, J. E., & De Mattos, G. T. (2003). Bird extinctions in Atlantic forest fragments of the Viçosa region, southeastern Brazil. Conservation Biology, 17, 1827–1839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ring, I. (2008). Integrating local ecological services into intergovernmental fiscal transfers: The case of the ecological ICMS in Brazil. Land Use Policy, 25, 485–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sorlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., & Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, E. R., Cullen, L., Jr., Beltrame, T. P., Moscogliato, A. V., & Silva, I. C. (2007). Avaliação Econômica de Sistemas Agroflorestais Implantados para Recuperação de Reserva Legal no Pontal do Paranapanema, São Paulo. Revista Arvore, 31, 941–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resolução CONAMA. Resolução nº 369 de 2006. On-line at: http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama/legiabre.cfm?codlegi=489

  • Sidle, R. C., & Ochiai, H. (2006). Landslides: Processes, prediction, and land use (Water resources monograph, Vol. 18, 312 pp). Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOS Mata Atlantica. (2009). Divulgação do novo Atlas Mata Atlântica. On line at http://www.sosmatatlantica.org.br/index.phpsection=content&action=contentDetails&idContent=392. Accessed Oct 2012.

  • Souto, L. E. (2009). Código (anti) ambiental de Santa Catarina. O Eco on-line: http://www.oeco.com.br/convidados/64-colunistas-convidados/21295-codigo-anti-ambiental-de-santa-catarina. Accessed Oct 2012.

  • Tabarelli, M., Pinto, L. P., Silva, J. M. C., Hirota, M., & Bede, L. (2005). Challenges and opportunities for biodiversity conservation in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Conservation Biology, 19, 695–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Kate, K. (2002). Global genetic resources: Science and the convention on biological diversity. Science, 295, 2371–2372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., & Downing, J. A. (1994). Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature, 367, 363–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP-GEF. (1998). GEF operational strategy. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC. (1998). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Retrieved September, 25, 2011, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf#page=12.

  • Vanacker, V., Blanckenburg, F., Govers, G., Molina, A., Poesen, J., Deckers, J., & Kubik, P. (2007). Restoring dense vegetation can slow mountain erosion to near natural benchmark levels. Geology, 35, 303–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanloqueren, G., & Baret, P. V. (2009). How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovations. Research Policy, 38, 971–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venter, O., Laurance, W. F., Iwamura, T., Wilson, K. A., Fuller, R. A., & Possingham, H. P. (2009). Harnessing carbon payments to protect biodiversity. Science, 326, 1368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, P. F., Barbosa, A. M., Assis, A. L. A. d. A., Prudêncio, J. M., Ribeiro, L. R., Pereira, M. L., & Gasparini, M. F. (2007). Diagnóstico Socioambiental Exploratório e Subsídios para a Definição de uma Estratégia de Desenvolvimento Territorial Sustentável no Município de Paulo Lopes. Florianopolis: UFSC.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2005). Project appraisal document on a proposed grant from the global environment facility trust fund in the amount of US$7.75 million to the state of São Paulo for a ecosystem restoration of Riparian forests in São Paulo project. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2007). World development report 2008: Agriculture for development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wunder, S., Engel, S., & Pagiola, S. (2008). Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programmes in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics, 65, 834–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Community Development and Applied Economics, University of Vermont, 205b Morrill Hall, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA

    Joshua Farley Ph.D.

  2. Departamento de Zootecnia e Desenvolvimento Rural, Centro de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil

    Abdon Schmitt Ph.D., Gisele Alarcon ABD & Paola May Rebollar ABD

  3. Rubenstein School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA

    Juan Alvez

Authors
  1. Abdon Schmitt Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joshua Farley Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juan Alvez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gisele Alarcon ABD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Paola May Rebollar ABD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua Farley Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Cultural Anthropology and Development St, Radboud University Nijmegen, Thomas van Aquinostraat 4, Nijmegen, 6525 GD, Netherlands

    Roldan Muradian

  2. , Institute of Social and Cultural Anthrop, University of Oxford, Banbury Road 51/53, Oxford, 0X2 6PE, United Kingdom

    Laura Rival

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schmitt, A., Farley, J., Alvez, J., Alarcon, G., Rebollar, P.M. (2013). Integrating Agroecology with Payments for Ecosystem Services in Santa Catarina’s Atlantic Forest. In: Muradian, R., Rival, L. (eds) Governing the Provision of Ecosystem Services. Studies in Ecological Economics, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5176-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation