Content-Matching: The Case of Sensory Memory and Phenomenal Consciousness

Chapter
Part of the Studies in Brain and Mind book series (SIBM, volume 5)

Abstract

Another aspect of consciousness science is the attempt to match the contents of consciousness to a suitable psychological or neural correlate. A case study is used to introduce and explore this approach. This is the recent claim that the rich contents of phenomenal consciousness can be found in the contents of sensory memory, based largely on Sperling’s finding of partial report superiority. By outlining the properties of sensory memory found in contemporary psychological theories, it is argued that this claim cannot be sustained. The relevant properties of sensory memory are not consistent with the apparent properties of phenomenal consciousness. It is further argued that reports of rich conscious content can be traced to the processing of scene gist, not item-specific information. This case study of the content-matching approach suggests that accounts of the contents of consciousness may be at odds with the contents of perceptual processing. The way this affects the strategy of content-matching, and consciousness science more generally, is discussed in the next chapter.

Keywords

Sensory Memory Phenomenal Consciousness Visible Persistence Phenomenal Experience Partial Report 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Block, N. (2001). Paradox and cross purposes in recent work on consciousness. Cognition, 79, 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Block, N. (2005). Two neural correlates of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Block, N. (2007). Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 481–548.Google Scholar
  4. Brewer, W. F., & Trevans, J. C. (1981). The role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brockmole, J. R., & Wang, R. F. (2003). Integrating visual images and visual percepts across space and time. Visual Cognition, 10, 853–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). The influence of color on the activation of scene gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 660–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gardelle, V. de, Sackur, J., & Kouider, S. (2009). Perceptual illusions in brief visual presentations. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 569–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  9. Di Lollo, V. (1980). Temporal integration in visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dretske, F. (2004). Change blindness. Philosophical Studies, 120, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dretske, F. (2007). What change blindness teaches about consciousness. Philosophical Perspectives, 21, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fodor, J. A. (2007). The revenge of the given. In B. P. McLaughlin & J. Cohen (Eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of mind (pp. 105–116). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Fodor, J. A. (2008). Preconceptual representation. LOT2: The language of thought revisited (pp. 169–196). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The role of fixation position in detecting scene chances across saccades. Psychological Science, 10, 438–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacob, P., & De Vignemont, F. (2010). Spatial coordinates and phenomenology in the two-visual systems model. In N. Gangopadhyay (Ed.), Perception, action, and consciousness: Sensorimotor dynamics and two-visual systems (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kouider, S., & Dupoux, E. (2004). Partial awareness creates the “illusion” of subliminal semantic priming. Psychological Science, 15, 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Landman, R., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2003). Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness. Vision Research, 43, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu, K., & Jiang, Y. (2005). Visual working memory for briefly presented scenes. Journal of Vision, 5, 650–658.Google Scholar
  20. Loftus, G. R., & Irwin, D. E. (1998). On the relations among different measures of visible and informational persistence. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 135–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Luck, S. J., & Hollingworth, A. (2008). Visual memory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCauley, R. N., & Bechtel, W. (2001). Explanatory pluralism and heuristic identity theory. Theory and Psychology, 11, 736–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oliva, A. (2005). The gist of a scene. In L. Itti, G. Rees, & J. K. Tsotsos (Eds.), The neurobiology of attention (pp. 251–256). London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pelli, D. G., Palomares, M., & Majaj, N. J. (2004). Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detection. Journal of Vision, 4, 1136–1169.Google Scholar
  25. Pezdek, K., Whetstone, T., Reynolds, K., Askari, N., & Dougherty, T. (1989). Memory for realworld scenes: The role of consistency with scheme expectation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 587–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Phillips, I. B. (2011). Perception and iconic memory. Mind & Language, 26, 381–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 803–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shanahan, M., & Baars, B. (2007). Global workspace theory emerges unscathed. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 524–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sligte, I. G., Scholte, H. S., & Lamme, V. A. F. (2008). Are there multiple visual short-term memory stores? PLoS 1, 3, 1–9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001699.Google Scholar
  30. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tarkiainen, A., Cornelissen, P. L., & Salmelin, R. (2002). Dynamics of visual feature analysis and object level processing in face versus letter-string perception. Brain, 125, 1125–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tye, M. (2006). Nonconceptual content, richness, and fineness of grain. In T. G. Szabo & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Perceptual experience (pp. 504–530). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Gulick, R. (2007). What if phenomenal consciousness admits of degrees? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30, 528–529.Google Scholar
  35. Van Rullen, R., & Thorpe, S. (2001). The time course of visual processing: From early perception to decision making. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 454–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wertheim, A. H., Hooge, I. T. C., Krikke, K., & Johnson, A. (2006). How important is lateral masking in visual search? Experimental Brain Research, 170, 387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Integrative NeuroscienceUniversity of TuebingenTuebingenGermany

Personalised recommendations