Advertisement

Impact of Climate Change on Selection of Sites for Lotus Cultivation

  • Mrinmoy MajumderEmail author
  • Rabindra Nath Barman
Chapter

Abstract

Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera) cultivation provides livelihoods to many people in the tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Lotus is commercially produced in different altitudes. The flower is cultivated in Asia, Australia, North America, and Egypt. Due to demand from the medicinal, fragrance, and culinary industries, as well as from religious sects, cultivation of lotus has become a common source of economic stability due to stable market demand. The harvesting of lotus suffers due to extreme weather patterns, insect attacks, quality degradation of harvesting ponds, and overuse of fertilizers. To ensure optimal production of lotus selection and to control the impact of such inhibitors, the selection of a suitable site is extremely important. That is why farmers invest considerable sums in acquiring ideal ponds for lotus production. Even then, problems still arise: inhabitants of the pond’s command area react aggressively to the bad odor produced by rotten tubers, ponds are breeding grounds for mosquitoes, and the rapid spread of lotus stems can prevent local aquatic population from prospering. Thus, the present study was initiated to provide a framework for lotus farmers in which to select a suitable pond to optimize production and maximize profit. The model framework uses neurogenetic models to predict the suitability of a pond for cultivation of the lotus plant.

Keywords

Neurogenetic models Lotus cultivation Selection mechanism 

References

  1. Cao K, Huang B, Wang S, Lin H (2012) Sustainable land use optimization using Boundary-based Fast Genetic Algorithm. Comput Environ Urban Syst 36(3):257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ganesan T, Vasant P, Elamvazuthi I (2011) Optimization of nonlinear geological structure mapping using hybrid neuro-genetic techniques. Math Comput Model 54(11–12):2913–2922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ines AVM, Honda K, Das Gupta A, Droogers P, Clemente RS (2006) Combining remote sensing-simulation modeling and genetic algorithm optimization to explore water management options in irrigated agriculture. Agric Water Manag 83(3):221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Li D, Yang HZ, Liang XF (2013) Application of Bayesian networks for diagnosis analysis of modified sequencing batch reactor. Adv Mater Res 610:1139–1145.Google Scholar
  5. Monjezi M, Bahrami A, Yazdani VA (2009) Simultaneous prediction of fragmentation and flyrock in blasting operation using artificial neural network. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:476–480Google Scholar
  6. Monjezi M, Amini Khoshalan H, Razifard M (2012) A neuro-genetic network for predicting uniaxial compressive strength of rocks. Geotech Geol Eng (Online First™, 17 April 2012)Google Scholar
  7. Nourani V, Khanghah TR, Sayyadi M (2013) Application of the artificial neural network to monitor the quality of treated water. Int J Manage Inf Technol 2(2):38–45.Google Scholar
  8. Ou S-L (2012) Forecasting agricultural output with an improved grey forecasting model based on the genetic algorithm. Comput Electron Agric 85:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pai TY, Hanaki K, Su HC, Yu LF (2013) A 24_h forecast of oxidant concentration in Tokyo using neural network and fuzzy learning approach. CLEAN–Soil, Air, Water.Google Scholar
  10. Panagopoulos Y, Makropoulos C, Mimikou M (2012) Decision support for diffuse pollution management. Environ Model Software 30:57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sahoo B, Maity D (2007) Damage assessment of structures using hybrid neuro-genetic algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 7(1):89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shiri J, Kişi Ö, Landeras G, López JJ, Nazemi AH, Stuy LCPM (2012) Daily reference evapotranspiration modeling by using genetic programming approach in the Basque Country (Northern Spain). J Hydrol 414–415:302–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Singh TN, Verma AK, Sharma PK (2007) A neuro-genetic approach for prediction of time dependent deformational characteristic of rock and its sensitivity analysis. Geotech Geol Eng 25(4):395–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Yun R, Singh VP, Dong Z (2010) Long-term stochastic reservoir operation using a noisy genetic algorithm. Water Resour Manag 24(12):3159–3172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yan Z, Di T, Ye YL, Han WJ (2013) The modeling of petrochemical wastewater activated sludge system and water quality forecast based on neural network. Adv Mater Res 641:219–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Hydro-Informatics EngineeringNational Institute of Technology Agartala, BarjalaJiraniaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Production EngineeringNational Institute of Technology Agartala, BarjalaJiraniaIndia

Personalised recommendations