Comparison of Nature-Based Algorithms in Impact Analysis of Climate Change on Water Resources

  • Mrinmoy MajumderEmail author
  • Rabindra Nath Barman


Predicting the impact of climate change on water availability of many regions, watersheds, or countries is currently a popular subject of research given the different signs of changes in climate. A thorough search of the relevant literature revealed that mainly conceptual, statistical, or stochastic models are used for the prediction of climatic impacts on water availability. In some studies, nature-based algorithms such as neural networks or genetic algorithms were used in predictions. From the performance metrics and according to the authors of such studies, the accuracy of nature-based models is much more consistent than the conceptual or statistical models. That is why the present study tries to analyze and compare the ability of nature-based models to predict climatic impacts on water availability from a data set that represents all possible combinations of input and output variables. Ultimately the goal is to identify the best nature-based model from among the many available ones. The investigation was able to use only four of the most popular nature-based algorithms namely Artificial Neural Network, Genetic Algorithm, Ant Colony Optimization and Artificial Bee Colony algorithm. Readers can employ other meta-heuristics to compare the performance of all such algorithms in prediction of climatic impact on water resources.


Nature-based algorithms Climate change Water availability 


  1. Alcamo J, Dronin N, Endejan M, Golubev G, Kirilenko A (2007) A new assessment of climate change impacts on food production shortfalls and water availability in Russia. Glob Environ Chang 17(3–4):429–444Google Scholar
  2. Beck L, Bernauer T (2011) How will combined changes in water demand and climate affect water availability in the Zambezi River basin? Glob Environ Chang 21(3):1061–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chandra Mohan B, Baskaran R (2012) A survey: Ant Colony Optimization based recent research and implementation on several engineering domain. Expert Syst Appl 39(4):4618–4627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70:213–220. doi: 10.1037/h0026256 Google Scholar
  5. Dorigo M (1992) Optimization, learning and natural algorithms. PhD thesis, Politecnico di Milano, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  6. Euchi J, Mraihi R (2012) The urban bus routing problem in the Tunisian case by the hybrid artificial ant colony algorithm. Swarm Evolut Comput 2:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feng YJ, Yu L, Zhang GL (2007) Ant colony pattern search algorithms for unconstrained and bound constrained optimization. Appl Math Comput 191(1):42–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao W, Liu S, Huang L (2012) A global best artificial bee colony algorithm for global optimization. J Comput Appl Math 236(11):2741–2753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Green TR, Taniguchi M, Kooi H, Gurdak JJ, Allen DM, Hiscock KM, Treidel H, Aureli A (2011) Beneath the surface of global change: impacts of climate change on groundwater. J Hydrol 405(3–4):532–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gromov VA, Shulga AN (2012) Chaotic time series prediction with employment of ant colony optimization. Expert Syst Appl 39(9):8474–8478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo C, Zhibin J, Zhang H, Li N (2012) Decomposition-based classified ant colony optimization algorithm for scheduling semiconductor wafer fabrication system. Comput Ind Eng 62(1):141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hajda P, Novotny V, Feng X, Yang R (1998) Simple feedback logic, genetic algorithms and artificial neural networks for real-time control of a collection system. Water Sci Technol 38(3):187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jankowska MM, Lopez-Carr D, Funk C, Husak GJ, Chafe ZA (2012) Climate change and human health: spatial modeling of water availability, malnutrition, and livelihoods in Mali, Africa. Appl Geogr 33:4–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kang Y, Khan S, Ma X (2009) Climate change impacts on crop yield, crop water productivity and food security – a review. Prog Nat Sci 19(12):1665–1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kang F, Li J, Ma Z (2011) Rosenbrock artificial bee colony algorithm for accurate global optimization of numerical functions. Inform Sci 181(16):3508–3531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karaboga D (2005) An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical report TR06, Erciyes University, Engineering Faculty, Computer Engineering DepartmentGoogle Scholar
  17. Nasseri M, Asghari K, Abedini MJ (2008) Optimized scenario for rainfall forecasting using genetic algorithm coupled with artificial neural network. Expert Syst Appl 35(3):1415–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ooba M, Hirano T, Mogami J-I, Hirata R, Fujinuma Y (2006) Comparisons of gap-filling methods for carbon flux dataset: a combination of a genetic algorithm and an artificial neural network. Ecol Model 198(3–4, 15):473–486Google Scholar
  19. Parish ES, Kodra E, Steinhaeuser K, Ganguly AR (2012) Estimating future global per capita water availability based on changes in climate and population. Comput Geosci 42:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Qiu GY, Yin J, Geng S (2012) Impact of climate and land-use changes on water security for agriculture in Northern China. Agric Sci China 11(1):144–150Google Scholar
  21. Samanta S, Chakraborty S (2011) Parametric optimization of some non-traditional machining processes using artificial bee colony algorithm. Eng Appl Artif Intel 24(6):946–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Srinivas V, Ramanjaneyulu K (2007) An integrated approach for optimum design of bridge decks using genetic algorithms and artificial neural networks. Adv Eng Softw 38(7):475–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sudholt D, Thyssen C (2012) Running time analysis of Ant Colony Optimization for shortest path problems. J Discrete Algorithms 10:165–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Verma OP, Kumar P, Hanmandlu M, Chhabra S (2012) High dynamic range optimal fuzzy color image enhancement using Artificial Ant Colony System. Appl Soft Comput 12(1):394–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weng SS, Liu YH (2006) Mining time series data for segmentation by using Ant Colony Optimization. Eur J Oper Res 173(3):921–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yu J, Chen Y, Wu J (2011) Modeling and implementation of classification rule discovery by ant colony optimisation for spatial land-use suitability assessment. Comput Environ Urban Syst 35(4):308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Hydro-Informatics EngineeringNational Institute of Technology Agartala, BarjalaJiraniaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Production EngineeringNational Institute of Technology Agartala, BarjalaJiraniaIndia

Personalised recommendations