Estimation of Groundwater Quality from Surface Water Quality Variables of a Tropical River Basin by Neurogenetic Models

  • Mrinmoy MajumderEmail author
  • Bipal Kr. Jana


According to the hydrological cycle, after rainfall infiltration becomes high and once the soil pores become saturated, surface runoff begins. The infiltrated water is added to the groundwater and depressions and canals are utilized to store or drain out excess water. Because surface water and groundwater have the same source, their quality is related, but the physiochemical properties of the soil layers and geological characteristics of the catchments also influence the quality of water in the surface and ground. Many scientific studies have established that surface water is not as pure and fit for drinking as groundwater. Groundwater is free of turbidity, suspended impurities, and organic and inorganic micropollutants. This reactive nature of water is almost neutral. Although groundwater is affected by dissolved metals (like arsenic, iron, etc.), volatile organic compounds and toxic gases, but the intensity of groundwater pollutants varies with location and surrounding geophysical and ecological structures. In most of the places people use groundwater for drinking without adopting any means of purification. If the source is free of organic and inorganic pollutants and if the metal and gaseous concentrations are low, then the ground/surface water can easily be used for drinking or washing purposes without much threat to human health. But if the surface water contaminates the source through leakage or accidental removal of the impervious layers, then it may contaminate the source, and use of the contaminated groundwater could cause affect public health. The present study attempts to predict the quality of groundwater with the help of surface water quality parameters along with some climatic and geophysical parameters. The study utilized neurogenetic models for predicting the quality of groundwater. The results show that predictions of pH and chlorine levels based on the parameters was found to be more accurate and reliable than the prediction of any other quality variables. Thus it can be concluded that if surface water and groundwater are mixed, the pH and turbidity will undergo the most dramatic change among all other quality variables.


Groundwater quality Neurogenetic models Damodar Basin 


  1. Adib A, Hadis J (2013) Stochastic approach to determination of suspended sediment concentration in tidal rivers by ANN and GA. Canadian J Civil Eng jaGoogle Scholar
  2. Angeline PJ, Saunders GM, Pollack JB (1994) An evolutionary algorithm that constructs recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5(1):54–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APHA, AWWA & WPCF (1981) Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 15th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Beniwal R, Beniwal NS, Gupta HO (2013) Optimization of multicarrier transmission using genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Res Electron Commun Eng 2(1):070Google Scholar
  5. Benli H (2013) Determination of thermal performance calculation of two different types solar air collectors with the use of artificial neural networks. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 60:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanco A, Delgado M, Pegalajar MC (2000) A genetic algorithm to obtain the optimal recurrent neural network. Int J Approx Reason 23(1):67–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Constantin ILIE, Constanta C, Margareta ILIE, Lucia MELNIC (2013) Simulating the number of romanian’s pupils and student using artificial intelligence techniques and country’s economic estate. revista economică: 102Google Scholar
  8. Coppola E Jr et al (2003) Artificial neural network approach for predicting transient water levels in a multilayered groundwater system under variable state, pumping, and climate conditions. J Hydrol Eng 8(6):348–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coulibaly P et al (2001) Artificial neural network modeling of water table depth fluctuations. Water Resour Res 37(4):885–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CTIC (2008) Groundwater & surface water: Understanding the interaction, know your watershed. Retrieved from Accessed 23 Jan 2013
  11. El Tabach E (2007) Use of artificial neural network simulation metamodelling to assess groundwater contamination in a road project. Math Comput Model 45(7):766–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallagher DL, Dietrich AM, Reay WG, Hayes MC, Simmons GM Jr (2007) Ground water discharge of agricultural pesticides and nutrients to estuarine surface water. Groundw Monit Remediat. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6592.1996.tb00579.x
  13. Gaur S, Ch S, Graillot D, Nagesh Kumar D (2013) Application of artificial neural networks and particle swarm optimization for the management of groundwater resources. Water Resour Manag 27(3):927–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IS:2296-1982; 2nd revision, 1st reprint March, 1986: Tolerance limit for inland surface water subject to pollution; Bureau of Indian StandardGoogle Scholar
  15. IS:10500-1991; 1st revision, 1st reprint October, 1992: Indian standard for drinking water specification; Bureau of Indian StandardGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuo Y-M, Liu C-W, Lin K-H (2004) Evaluation of the ability of an artificial neural network model to assess the variation of groundwater quality in an area of blackfoot disease in Taiwan. Water Res 38(1):148–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leung FHF et al (2003) Tuning of the structure and parameters of a neural network using an improved genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 14(1):79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Majumder M, Roy PK, Mazumdar A (2010) Watershed modeling of river Damodar with the help of artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Phd thesis, Jadavpur UniversityGoogle Scholar
  19. Method of water analysis: analysis of water samples were conducted as per IS: 2296, IS:10500 and Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater (APHA, AWWA & WPCF)Google Scholar
  20. Nayak PC, Satyaji Rao YR, Sudheer KP (2006) Groundwater level forecasting in a shallow aquifer using artificial neural network approach. Water Resour Manag 20(1):77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ranjithan S, Eheart JW, Garrett JH Jr (1993) Neural network-based screening for groundwater reclamation under uncertainty. Water Resour Res 29(3):563–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reay WG, Gallagher DL, Simmons GM Jr (1992) Groundwater discharge and its impact on surface water quality in a Chesapeake Bay inlet. Water Resour Bull 28(6):1121–1134Google Scholar
  23. Shiri J, Kisi O, Yoon H, Lee K-K, Nazemi AH (2013) Predicting groundwater level fluctuations with meteorological effect implications-A comparative study among soft computing techniques. Comput GeosciGoogle Scholar
  24. Van der Kwaak JE (1999) Numerical simulation of flow and chemical transport in integrated surface-subsurface hydrologic systems. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 217 pGoogle Scholar
  25. Verstraeten IM, Carr JD, Steele GV, Thurman EM, Bastian KC, Dormedy DF (1998) Surface water-ground water interaction: herbicide transport into municipal collector wells. J Environ Qual 28(5):1396–1405Google Scholar
  26. White D, Ligomenides P (1993) GANNet: a genetic algorithm for optimizing topology and weights in neural network design. New trends in neural computation. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  27. Xin Z-h, Zhang H-j (2002) Neural Network and Genetic Algorithms for Topology Optimization of the CCS7 Network. Int Trans Operat Res 9:427–436. doi: 10.1111/1475-3995.00365 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yen GG, Lu H (2000) Hierarchical genetic algorithm based neural network design. Combinations of evolutionary computation and neural networks, 2000 IEEE symposium on. IEEEGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Hydro-Informatics EngineeringNational Institute of Technology Agartala, BarjalaJiraniaIndia
  2. 2.Consulting Engineering Services, “AKARIK,”KolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations