Advertisement

Application of Interval Fields for Uncertainty Modeling in a Geohydrological Case

  • Wim Verhaeghe
  • Wim Desmet
  • Dirk Vandepitte
  • Ingeborg Joris
  • Piet Seuntjens
  • David Moens
Part of the Computational Methods in Applied Sciences book series (COMPUTMETHODS, volume 26)

Abstract

In situ soil remediation requires a good knowledge about the processes that occur in the subsurface. Groundwater transport models are needed to predict the flow of contaminants. Such a model must contain information on the material layers. This information is obtained from in situ point measurements which are costly and thus limited in number. The overall model is thus characterised by uncertainty. This uncertainty has a spatial character, i.e. the value of an uncertain parameter can vary based on the location in the model itself. In other words the uncertain parameter is non-uniform throughout the model. On the other hand the uncertain parameter does have some spatial dependency, i.e. the particular value of the uncertainty in one location is not totally independent of its value in a location adjacent to it. To deal with such uncertainties the authors have developed the concept of interval fields. The main advantage of the interval field is its ability to represent a field uncertainty in two separate entities: one to represent the uncertainty and one to represent the spatial dependency. The main focus of the paper is on the application of interval fields to a geohydrological problem. The uncertainty taken into account is the material layers’ hydraulic conductivity. The results presented are the uncertainties on the contaminant’s concentration near a river. The second objective of the paper is to define an input uncertainty elasticity of the output. In other words, identify the locations in the model, whose uncertainties influence the uncertainty on the output the most. Such a quantity will indicate where to perform additional in situ point measurements to reduce the uncertainty on the output the most.

Keywords

Hydraulic Conductivity Fuzzy Number Base Vector Correlation Length Spatial Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The support of the Flemish Government through IWT-SBO project no. 060043: Fuzzy Finite Element Method is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    De Munck, M.: Efficient optimization approaches for interval and fuzzy finite element analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (2009) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Munck, M., Moens, D., Desmet, W., Vandepitte, D.: An efficient response surface based optimisation method for non-deterministic harmonic and transient dynamic analysis. Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 47(2), 119–166 (2009) MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ghanem, R., Spanos, P.: Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach. Springer, New York (1991) zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hanss, M.: Applied Fuzzy Arithmetic—An Introduction with Engineering Applications. Springer, Berlin (2005) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moens, D., De Munck, M., Farkas, L., De Gersem, H., Desmet, W., Vandepitte, D.: Recent advances in interval finite element analysis in applied mechanics. In: Proceedings of the First Leuven Symposium on Applied Mechanics in Engineering LSAME.08, Leuven, pp. 553–568 (2008) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moens, D., De Munck, M., Desmet, W., Vandepitte, D.: Numerical dynamic analysis of uncertain mechanical structures based on interval fields. In: IUTAM Symposium on Vibration Analysis of Structures with Uncertainties, Saint Petersburg (2009) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sejna, M., Simunek, J., Van Genuchten, R.: Software package for simulating water, heat and solute movement in two- and three-dimensional variably saturated media. PC-Progress s.r.o, Prague. www.hydrus3D.com
  8. 8.
    Sudret, B., Der Kiureghian, A.: Stochastic finite element methods and reliability: a state-of-the-art report. Technical report, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkley, Institute of Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Materials (2010) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vanmarcke, E.: Random Fields: Analysis and Synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Verhaeghe, W., Rousounelos, A., Desmet, W., Vandepitte, D., Moens, D.: Interval fields to represent uncertainty on input and output side of a FE analysis. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Uncertainty in Structural Dynamics, pp. 5067–5078 (2010) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Verhaeghe, W., Desmet, W., Vandepitte, D., Moens, D.: Uncertainty assessment in random field representations: an interval approach. In: Proceedings of NAFIPS 2011, El Paso, TX (2011) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965) MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wim Verhaeghe
    • 1
  • Wim Desmet
    • 1
  • Dirk Vandepitte
    • 1
  • Ingeborg Joris
    • 2
  • Piet Seuntjens
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • David Moens
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringK.U. LeuvenHeverleeBelgium
  2. 2.VITOMolBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Soil ManagementGhent UniversityGentBelgium
  4. 4.Department of Bioscience EngineeringUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpenBelgium
  5. 5.Dept. of Applied Engineering, Lessius Hogeschool—Campus De NayerK.U. Leuven AssociationSint-Katelijne-WaverBelgium

Personalised recommendations