A Comparative Study of Uncertainty Propagation Methods in Structural Problems
Several uncertainty propagation algorithms are available in literature: (i) MonteCarlo simulations based on response surfaces, (ii) approximate uncertainty propagation algorithms, and (iii) non probabilistic algorithms. All of these approaches are based on some a priori assumptions about the nature of design variables uncertainty and on the models and systems behavior. Some of these assumptions could misrepresent the original problem and, consequently, could yield to erroneous design solutions, in particular where the prior information is poor or inexistent (complete ignorance). Therefore, when selecting a method to solve an uncertainty based design problem, several aspects should be considered: prior assumptions, non-linearity of the performance function, number of input random variables and required accuracy. It could be useful to develop some guidelines to choose an appropriate method for a specific situation.
In the present work some classical structural problems will be studied in order to investigate which probabilistic approach, in terms of accuracy and computational cost, better propagates the uncertainty from input to output data. The methods under analysis will be: Univariate Dimension Reduction methods, Polynomial Chaos Expansion, First-Order Second Moment method, and algorithms based on the Evidence Theory for epistemic uncertainty. The performances of these methods will be compared in terms of moment estimations and probability density function construction corresponding to several scenarios of reliability based design and robust design. The structural problems presented will be: (1) the static, dynamic and buckling behavior of a composite plate, (2) the reconstruction of the deformed shape of a structure from measured surface strains.
- 2.Cerracchio, P., Gherlone, M., Mattone, M., Di Sciuva, M., Tessler, A.: Shape sensing of three-dimensional frame structures using the inverse finite element method. In: Proc. Fifth European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Sorrento, Italy, pp. 615–620 (2010) Google Scholar
- 3.Cerracchio, P., Gherlone, M., Mattone, M., Di Sciuva, M., Tessler, A.: Inverse finite element method for three-dimensional frame structures. DIASP Report Politecnico di Torino 285 (2010) Google Scholar
- 4.Xu, H., Rahman, S.: A moment-based stochastic method for response moment and reliability analysis. In: Proc. Second MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics (2003) Google Scholar
- 11.Helton, J.C., Johnson, J.D., Oberkampf, W.L., Storli, C.B.: A sampling-based computational strategy for the representation of epistemic uncertainty in model predictions with evidence theory. Sandia report SAND2006-5557, Sandia National Laboratories (2006). http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2006/065557.pdf
- 12.Sentz, K., Ferson, S.: Combination of evidence in Dempster–Shafer theory. Sandia report SAND2002-083, Sandia National Laboratories (2002). http://www.sandia.gov/epistemic/Reports/SAND2002-0835.pdf
- 13.Saltelli, A., Chan, K., Scott, E.M.: Sensitivity Analysis. Wiley, New York (2008) Google Scholar
- 15.Tessler, A., Di Sciuva, M., Gherlone, M.: Refined zigzag theory for laminated composite and sandwich plates. NASA/TP-2009-215561, Langley Research Center (2009) Google Scholar
- 17.Tessler, A., Di Sciuva, M., Gherlone, M.: A shear-deformation theory for composite and sandwich plates using improved zigzag kinematics. In: IX International Conference on Computational Structural Technology, 2–5 September, Greece, Proceedings on Cd, Paper 30 (2008) Google Scholar
- 20.Corradi, M.: Uncertainty management techniques for aerospace structural design. Ph.D. thesis, Politecnico di Torino (2011) Google Scholar