A Comparative Study of Uncertainty Propagation Methods in Structural Problems

  • Manuele Corradi
  • Marco Gherlone
  • Massimiliano Mattone
  • Marco Di Sciuva
Part of the Computational Methods in Applied Sciences book series (COMPUTMETHODS, volume 26)

Abstract

Several uncertainty propagation algorithms are available in literature: (i) MonteCarlo simulations based on response surfaces, (ii) approximate uncertainty propagation algorithms, and (iii) non probabilistic algorithms. All of these approaches are based on some a priori assumptions about the nature of design variables uncertainty and on the models and systems behavior. Some of these assumptions could misrepresent the original problem and, consequently, could yield to erroneous design solutions, in particular where the prior information is poor or inexistent (complete ignorance). Therefore, when selecting a method to solve an uncertainty based design problem, several aspects should be considered: prior assumptions, non-linearity of the performance function, number of input random variables and required accuracy. It could be useful to develop some guidelines to choose an appropriate method for a specific situation.

In the present work some classical structural problems will be studied in order to investigate which probabilistic approach, in terms of accuracy and computational cost, better propagates the uncertainty from input to output data. The methods under analysis will be: Univariate Dimension Reduction methods, Polynomial Chaos Expansion, First-Order Second Moment method, and algorithms based on the Evidence Theory for epistemic uncertainty. The performances of these methods will be compared in terms of moment estimations and probability density function construction corresponding to several scenarios of reliability based design and robust design. The structural problems presented will be: (1) the static, dynamic and buckling behavior of a composite plate, (2) the reconstruction of the deformed shape of a structure from measured surface strains.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee, S.H., Chen, W.: A Comparative study of uncertainty propagation methods for black-box-type problems. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 37(3), 239–253 (2009) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cerracchio, P., Gherlone, M., Mattone, M., Di Sciuva, M., Tessler, A.: Shape sensing of three-dimensional frame structures using the inverse finite element method. In: Proc. Fifth European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Sorrento, Italy, pp. 615–620 (2010) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cerracchio, P., Gherlone, M., Mattone, M., Di Sciuva, M., Tessler, A.: Inverse finite element method for three-dimensional frame structures. DIASP Report Politecnico di Torino 285 (2010) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xu, H., Rahman, S.: A moment-based stochastic method for response moment and reliability analysis. In: Proc. Second MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics (2003) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rahman, S., Xu, H.: A univariate dimension-reduction method for multi-dimensional integration in stochastic mechanics. Probab. Eng. Mech. 19(1), 393–408 (2004) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu, H., Rahman, S.: A generalized dimension-reduction method for multidimensional integration in stochastic mechanics. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 65(13), 1992–2019 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wiener, N.: The homogeneous chaos. Am. J. Math. 60, 897–936 (1938) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cameron, R.H., Martin, W.T.: The orthogonal development of nonlinear functionals in series of Fourier–Hermite functionals. Ann. Math. 48(2), 385–392 (1947) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xiu, D., Karniadakis, G.M.: The Wiener–Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24(2), 619–644 (2002) MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ticky, M.: Applied Methods of Structural Reliability. Springer, Berlin (1993) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Helton, J.C., Johnson, J.D., Oberkampf, W.L., Storli, C.B.: A sampling-based computational strategy for the representation of epistemic uncertainty in model predictions with evidence theory. Sandia report SAND2006-5557, Sandia National Laboratories (2006). http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/2006/065557.pdf
  12. 12.
    Sentz, K., Ferson, S.: Combination of evidence in Dempster–Shafer theory. Sandia report SAND2002-083, Sandia National Laboratories (2002). http://www.sandia.gov/epistemic/Reports/SAND2002-0835.pdf
  13. 13.
    Saltelli, A., Chan, K., Scott, E.M.: Sensitivity Analysis. Wiley, New York (2008) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crestaux, T., Le Maitre, O., Martinez, J.M.: Polynomial chaos expansion for sensitivity analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 94(7), 1161–1172 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tessler, A., Di Sciuva, M., Gherlone, M.: Refined zigzag theory for laminated composite and sandwich plates. NASA/TP-2009-215561, Langley Research Center (2009) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tessler, A., Di Sciuva, M., Gherlone, M.: A consistent refinement of first-order shear-deformation theory for laminated composite and sandwich plates using improved zigzag kinematics. J. Mech. Mater. Struct. 5, 341–367 (2010). doi:10.2140/jomms.2010.5.341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tessler, A., Di Sciuva, M., Gherlone, M.: A shear-deformation theory for composite and sandwich plates using improved zigzag kinematics. In: IX International Conference on Computational Structural Technology, 2–5 September, Greece, Proceedings on Cd, Paper 30 (2008) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tessler, A., Di Sciuva, M., Gherlone, M.: Refined zigzag theory for homogeneous, laminate composite, and sandwich plates: a homogeneous limit methodology for zigzag function selection. Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Equ. 27(1), 208–229 (2011) MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tessler, A., Spangler, J.L.: A least-squares variational method for full-field reconstruction of elastic deformations in shear-deformable plates and shells. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 94, 327–339 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Corradi, M.: Uncertainty management techniques for aerospace structural design. Ph.D. thesis, Politecnico di Torino (2011) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuele Corradi
    • 1
  • Marco Gherlone
    • 1
  • Massimiliano Mattone
    • 1
  • Marco Di Sciuva
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Aeronautics and Space EngineeringPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations