Implications for Teaching Business Ethics

  • Minka WoermannEmail author
Part of the Issues in Business Ethics book series (IBET, volume 37)


In this concluding chapter, an overview is given of the core components that should be addressed in business ethics education, in order to both deal with the fundamental problems that characterise our times, as well as to promote the future viability of business ethics. The analysis of these core components is based on the complexity and Derridean insights presented in the foregoing chapters, and the aim of the analysis is to unpack teaching strategies that can equip students with the sense-making tools and tools of analysis needed to reflect upon the normative dimensions of complex business challenges. Since these challenges are context-dependent, the analysis does not provide examples of specific pedagogical interventions, because these interventions must be forged within specific environments. The suggestions made in this chapter therefore stand prior to any particular teaching guide or curriculum.


Business Ethic Teaching Strategy Moral Development Moral Awareness Corporate Identity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bauman, Z. 1993. Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Kohlberg, L. 1984. The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  4. Lissack, M.R., and H. Letiche. 2002. Complexity, emergence, resilience, and coherence: Gaining perspectives on organizations and their study. Emergence 4(3): 72–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Montuori, A. 1996. The art of transformation: Jazz as a metaphor for education. Holistic Education Review 9(4): 57–62.Google Scholar
  6. Morin, E. 1999. Seven complex lessons in education for the future, trans. N. Poller. Paris: UNESCO Publication. Google Scholar
  7. Morin, E. 2008. On complexity, trans. S.M. Kelly. Cresskill: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  8. Rorty, R. 1999. Philosophy and social hope. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  9. Smith, A. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and cause of the wealth of nations. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.Google Scholar
  10. Streufert, S., and G.Y. Nogami. 1989. Cognitive style and complexity: Implications for I/O psychology. In International review of industrial and organizational psychology, ed. C. Cooper and I. Robertson, 93–143. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Swenson, D.X., and D. Rigoni. 1999. Ethical problem solving and systems theory: The complexity connection. Systemic Practice and Action Research 12(6): 573–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Trevino, L.K. 1986. Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review 11(3): 601–617.Google Scholar
  13. Trevino, L.K., and M.E. Brown. 2004. Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. The Academy of Management Executive 18(2): 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Williams, S.D., and T. Dewett. 2005. Yes, you can teach business ethics: A review and research agenda. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 12(2): 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Centre for Applied EthicsStellenbosch UniversityMatielandSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations