An Online Learning Community as Support for At-Risk Students’ Literacy Growth: Findings, Implications, and Challenges

  • William H. Teale
  • Katie Lyons
  • Linda Gambrell
  • Nina Zolt
  • Rebecca Olien
  • Donald J. Leu
Chapter
Part of the Literacy Studies book series (LITS, volume 7)

Abstract

In2Books is an online learning environment that brings together 9–12-year-old students in American elementary schools with adult mentors for the purpose of reading, responding to, and writing about children’s books in order to promote higher-level thinking and achievement related to literacy. Over the 10 years of its development, In2Books has focused especially on helping children from economically at-risk home backgrounds. This chapter discusses a series of three studies that have examined program impact on student achievement and engagement, as well as a variety of factors involved in constructing an online environment that is designed to be both user-friendly and educationally impactful. It addresses especially five crucial issues that have arisen in this process that we feel are instructive for future development related to online learning environments that intend to promote literacy skill in elementary school-age children.

Keywords

Professional Development Reading Comprehension Grade Level Small Group Discussion Online Learning Environment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Cosner, S. (2011a). Supporting the initiation and early development of evidence-based grade-level collaboration in urban elementary schools: Key roles and strategies of principals and literacy coordinators. Urban Education, 20, 1–42.Google Scholar
  2. Cosner, S. (2011b). Teacher learning, instructional considerations, and principal communication: Lessons from a longitudinal study of collaborative data use by teachers. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 39(5), 568–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2006). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Gambrell, L. B., Hughes, E., Calvert, W., Malloy, J., & Igo, B. (2011). Authentic reading, writing, and discussion: An exploratory study of a pen pal project. Elementary School Journal, 112(2), 234–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gambrell, L. B., Palmer, B. M., Codling, R. M., & Mazzoni, S. A. (1996). Assessing motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 49, 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Glasswell, K., & Teale, W. H. (2007). Authentic assessment of authentic student work in urban classrooms. In J. R. Paratore & R. L. McCormack (Eds.), Classroom literacy assessment: Making sense of what students know and do (pp. 262–279). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  7. Kucan, L., & Palincsar, A. (2011). Locating struggling readers in a reconfigured landscape. In M. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 342–358). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Lai, M. K., & McNaughton, S. (2009). Raising student achievement in poor communities through evidence-based conversations. In L. M. Earl & H. Timperley (Eds.), Professional learning conversations: 13 challenges in using evidence for improvement (pp. 13–27). Toronto: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lyons, K. (2010, May). Readers connected (Final report to the Chicago Foundation for Education, Teachers Network Leadership Institute MetLife Fellowship). Chicago: Author.Google Scholar
  10. Malloy, J. A., & Gambrell, L. B. (2010). The contribution of discussion to reading comprehension and critical thinking. In R. Allington & A. McGill-Franzen (Eds.), Handbook of reading ­disabilities research. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. McKenna, M., Kear, D. J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children’s attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 934–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. (2007). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mills, G. (2003). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Resnick, L. B. (1999, June 16). Making America smarter. Education Week Century Series, 18(40), 38040. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: http://www.edweek.org/ew/vol-18/40resnick.h18
  15. Ross, S. M., Nunnery, J. A., Goldfeder, E., McDonald, A., Rachor, R., Hornbeck, M., & Fleischman, S. (2004). Using school reform models to improve reading achievement: A longitudinal study of direct instruction and success for all in an urban district. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 9(4), 357–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Teale, W. H., & Gambrell, L. B. (2007). Raising urban students’ literacy achievement by engaging in authentic, challenging work. The Reading Teacher, 60, 728–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Teale, W. H., Zolt, N., Yokota, J., Glasswell, K., & Gambrell, L. (2007). Getting children In2Books: Engagement in authentic reading, writing, and thinking. Phi Delta Kappan, 88, 498–502.Google Scholar
  18. Timperley, H. S., Parr, J. M., & Bertanees, C. (2009). Promoting professional inquiry for improved outcomes for students in New Zealand. Professional Development in Education, 35(2), 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.) Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1934)Google Scholar
  20. Wolf, M. K., Crosson, A. C., & Resnick, L. B. (2005). Classroom talk for rigorous reading ­comprehension instruction. Reading Psychology, 26, 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • William H. Teale
    • 1
  • Katie Lyons
    • 2
  • Linda Gambrell
    • 3
  • Nina Zolt
    • 4
  • Rebecca Olien
    • 4
  • Donald J. Leu
    • 5
  1. 1.University of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.National Teachers AcademyChicago Public SchoolsChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Clemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  4. 4.ePalsWashingtonUSA
  5. 5.University of ConnecticutStorrs, MansfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations