Advertisement

Global Forest Governance: Multiple Practices of Policy Performance

  • Bas Arts
  • Innocent Babili
Chapter
Part of the World Forests book series (WFSE, volume 14)

Abstract

According to various observers, global forest governance has largely failed. Deforestation is continuing and there is no legally binding international treaty on forests. Although these observations seem truisms, another reading of the performance of global forest governance is possible, as this chapter shows, via two lines of reasoning. Firstly, the deforestation narrative is replaced by one on country-specific forest dynamics, since forest transitions—shifts from forest loss to forest expansion—are taking place in several countries around the world. Secondly, the role of global ideas, norms and rules in national policies and local practices is analysed. Two case studies, one on participatory forest management and one on forest certification, both from Tanzania, are presented. It is shown that voluntary ideas, norms and rules on participation and certification travel from the global to the local—through policy makers, donors, NGOs, companies, etc.—and together shape the management of forests in specific sites. It is also shown that this global–local nexus can yield positive results for both forests and people. This chapter builds upon discursive institutionalism and practice theory.

Keywords

Global forest governance Policy performance  Discursive institutionalism Practice theory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jelle Behagel, Lukas Giessen, Laurent Umans and Freerk Wiersum for their very valuable comments and suggestions on reading the first version of this chapter.

References

  1. Agrawal A, Chhatre A, HardinHardin R (2008) Changing governance of the world’s forests. Science 320:1460–1462PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold J (2001). Forests and people. 25 years of community forestry. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  3. Arts B, Appelstrand M, Kleinschmit D, Pülzl H, Visseren-Hamakers I et al (2010) Discourses, actors and instruments in international forest governance. In: Rayner J, Buck A , Katila P (eds) Embracing complexity. Meeting the challenges of international forest governance. IUFRO World Series 28, 57–74Google Scholar
  4. Arts B (2000) Regimes, non-state actors and the state system. A structurational regime model. Eur J In Relat 6(4):515–544Google Scholar
  5. Arts B (2004) The local-global nexus. NGOs and the articulation of scale. J Econ Social Geogr 95(5):498–511Google Scholar
  6. Arts B, Buizer M (2009) Forests, discourses, institutions. A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. For Policy Econ 11:340–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Assche K. van, Beunen R, Duineveld M (2011) Performing success and failure in governance. Dutch planning experiences. Public administration (article in press)Google Scholar
  8. Babili I, Arts B (forthcoming). Institutional change and performance in decentralized forest management in Babati district, Tanzania Babati district, Tanzania (paper in preparation)Google Scholar
  9. Beeko C, Arts B (2010) The EU-Ghana VPA: a comprehensive policy analysis. Int Forestry Rev 12(3):221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bevir M (2010) Democratic governance. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  11. Blomley T, Kerstin P et al (2008) Seeing the wood for the trees. An assessment of the impact of participatory forest management on the forest condition in Tanzania. Oryx 42(3):380–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blyth M (2002) Institutions and ideas. In: Marsh D , Stoker G (eds) Theory and methods in political science. Palgrave McMillan, Houndmills and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. BourdieuBourdieu P (1990) The logic of practice. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Cashore B, Auld G, Newson D (2004) Governance through markets. Forest certification and the emergence of non-State authority. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  15. Charnley S, Poe M (2007) Community forestry in theory and practice. Where are we now? Annu Rev Anthropology 36:301–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cleaver F (2002) Reinventing institutions. Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. Eur J Dev Res 14(2):11–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Pourcq K, Thomas E, van Damme P (2009) Indigenous community-based forestry in the Bolivian lowlands. Some challenges for certification. Int Forestry Rev 11:12–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dimitrov R (2005) Hostage to norms. States, institutions and global forest politics. Global Environ Polit 5(4):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dimitrov R, Sprinz D, DiGuisto G, Kelle A (2007) International non regimes. A research agenda. Int Stud Rev 9:230–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunn W (2003) Public policy analysis. An introduction. Pearson Education Ltd, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  21. FAO (2010) Global forest resources assessment 2010. Food and Agriculture Organization, RomeGoogle Scholar
  22. Friedman T (2006) The world is flat. The globalized world in the 21st Century. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Geist H, Lambin E (2001). What drives tropical deforestation? LUCC Report Series No. 4Google Scholar
  24. Grainger A (2008) Difficulties in tracking the long-term trend in global forest area. PNAS 105(2):818–823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Habermas J (1996) Between facts and norms. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Hajer M (1995) The politics of environmental discourse. Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Hajer M, Wagenaar H (eds) (2003) Deliberative policy analysis. Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoogeveen H, Verkooijen P (2010) Transforming sustainable development diplomacy. Lessons learned from global forest governance. Doctoral thesis. Wageningen University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  30. Humphreys D (2006) Logjam. Deforestation and the crisis of global governance. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Kajembe G, Nduwamungu J (2004). Participatory forest management participatory forest management in Tanzania. A paradigm shift. Paper presented at the Earth Day on April 22, 2004 at the Auditorium of the American Embassy, Dar es Salaam, TanzaniaGoogle Scholar
  32. Koning J. de (2011) Reshaping institutions. Forest policy in Bolivia and Ecuador. PhD Diss, Wageningen University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  33. Krasner S (1982) Structural causes and regime consequences. Regimes as intervening variables. Int Organiz 36(2):185–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lemos M, Agrawal A (2006) Environmental governance. Annu Rev Env Resour 31:297–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McDermott L, Carroll AO’, Wood P (2007) International forest policy. The instruments, agreements and processes that shape it. United Nations Forum on Forests Secretariat, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Meyfroidt P, Lambin E (2011) Global forest transition. Prospects for an end to deforestation. Annu Rev Env Resour 36:343–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mosse D (2005) Cultivating development. An ethnography of aid policy and practice. Pluto Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Mustalahti I, Lund J (2010) Where and how can participatory forest management succeed? Learning from Tanzania, Mozambique, and Laos. Soc Nat Resour 23:31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nash C (2000) Performativity in practice. Some recent work in cultural geography. Prog Hum Geogr 24(4):653–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Palo M, Lehto E (2012) Private or socialistic forestry? Forest transition in finland versus deforestation in the Tropics. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  41. Peluso NL (1992) Rich forests, poor people. Resource control and resistance in Java. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles and OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Pülzl H (2010) Die politik des waldes. Böhlau, WienGoogle Scholar
  43. Rayner J, Buck A, Katila P (eds) (2010). Embracing complexity. Meeting the challenges of international forest governance. IUFRO World Series 28Google Scholar
  44. Rittberger V (ed) (1993) Regime theory and international relations. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Salasala N (2011) Impact of FSCFSC on social welfare. The case of Kikole community Kikole community-based forest project in Tanzania. MSc Thesis: Wageningen University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  46. Sands R (2005) Forestry in global context. CABI, OxfordshireGoogle Scholar
  47. Schatzki T (2002) The site of the social. A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. The Pennsylvania State University Press, Pennsylvania  Google Scholar
  48. Schmidt V (2005) Institutionalism and the state. In: Hay C, Marsh D, Lister M (eds.) (2005). The state: theories and issues. Basingstoke: PalgraveGoogle Scholar
  49. Schmidt V (2008) Discursive institutionalism. The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annu Rev Political Sci 11:303–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scott JC (1998) Seeing like a state. How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, New Haven and LondonGoogle Scholar
  51. Scouvart M, Adams R, Caldas M et al (2007) Causes of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. A qualitative comparative analysis. J Land Use Sci 2(4):257–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change. The stern review. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. van Tatenhove J, Arts B, Leroy P (eds) (2000) Political modernization and the environment. The renewal of policy arrangements. Kluwer Academic, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  54. Visseren-Hamakers I, Glasbergen P (2007) Partnerships in forest governance. Global Environ Change 17:408–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Visseren-Hamakers IJ, Arts B, Glasbergen P (2011) Interaction management by partnerships. The case of biodiversity and climate change. Global Environ Polit 11(4):89–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wagenaar H (2011) Meaning in action. Interpretation and dialogue in policy analysis. M. E. Sharp Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Wagenaar H, Cook S (2003). Understanding policy practices: Action, dialectic and deliberation in policy analysis. In: Hajer M , Wagenaar H(eds). Deliberative policy analysis. Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University, Cambridge pp. 139–171Google Scholar
  58. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  59. Wiersum F, Humphries S , van Bommel S (2011). Certification of community forestry enterprises. Experiences with incorporating community forestry in a global system for forest governance. Small-Scale Forestry (article in press)Google Scholar
  60. Wiersum KF (1995) 200 years of sustainability in forestry Lessons from history. Environ Manage 19(3):321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilson E (2006) Nature revealed. Selected writings 1949–2006. The Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  62. Young O (1980) International regimes: problems of concept formation. World Polit 32(3):331–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forest and Nature Conservation Policy GroupWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute of Continuing Education, Sokoine University of AgricultureMorogoroTanzania

Personalised recommendations