Abstract
In recent years, ecosystem management and recreation have become closely intertwined. Ecosystem management (ESM) influences recreational opportunities and the attractiveness of natural areas, so nowadays local communities are often invited to participate in decision-making about it. And in some cases, local communities object to ecosystem management measures. We will argue that analysing these phenomena as practices can reveal how they mutually influence each other. We will show that recreational practices (which we propose to call experiential practices) are based on the attribution of positive meanings to nature. We also show that if such practices are threatened by new or changing ecosystem management measures, social protest may emerge. We also argue that both recreational behaviour and the appreciation of nature are highly routinised. However, the implementation of contested ESM measures may disrupt such routines and trigger local communities to protest against these measures and, under certain conditions, the protest can even influence management policy. We end the chapter with a short reflection on the role of qualitative and quantitative methodologies in a practice based approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arriaza M, Cañas-Ortega JF, Cañas-Madueño JA, Ruiz-Aviles P (2004) Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape Urban Plan 69:115–125
Bafna S (2003) Space syntax: a brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environ Behav 35:17–29
van den Berg AE, Koole SL (2006) New wilderness in the Netherlands: an investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes. Landscape Urban Plan 78:362–372
van den Berg AE, Vlek CAJ, Coeterier JF (1998) Group differences in the aesthetic evaluation of nature development plans: a multilevel approach. J Environ Psychol 18:141–157
van Bommel S (2008) Understanding experts and expertise in different governance contexts: the case of nature conservation in the Drentsche Aa area in the Netherlands. Doctoral thesis. Wageningen University, Wageningen
Buijs AE (2009) Public support for river restoration. A mixed-method study into local residents’ support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains. J Environ Manage 90:2680–2689
Buijs AE, Arts BJM, Elands BHM, Lengkeek J (2011) Beyond environmental frames: the social representation and cultural resonance of nature in conflicts over a Dutch woodland. Geoforum 42:329–342
Cole DN (1993) Minimizing conflict between recreation and nature conservation. In: Smith DS, Hellmund PC (eds) Ecology of greenways: design and function of linear conservation areas. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Elands BHM, Turnhout E (eds) (2009) Burgers, beleid en natuur: tussen draagvlak en betrokkenheid. WOt-studies 9. Wettelijke Onderzoekstaken Natuur & Milieu, Wageningen
Elands, BHM. and Lengkeek J (2012). The tourist experience of out-there-ness: theory and empirical research. Forest Policy and Economics 19(1): 31–38 http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy.library.wur.nl/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.11.004
Fischer A, Marshall K (2010) Framing the landscape: discourses of woodland restoration and moorland management in Scotland. Journal of Rural Studies 26:185–193
Gergen KJ (2001) Psychological science in a postmodern context. Am Psychol 56:803–813
Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. Polity Press, Cambridge
Gobster PH, Nassauer JI, Daniel TC, Fry G (2007) The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecol 22:959–972
Goossen CM (2008) Monitoring recreatiegedrag van Nederlanders in landelijke gebieden; 2006/2007. Wettelijke Onderzoekstaken Natuur & Milieu, WOt werkdocument 146, Wageningen
Hajer MA, Wagenaar H (2003) Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hull RB, Stewart WP (1995) The landscape encountered and experienced while hiking. Environ Behaviour 27(3):404–426
Hunziker M, Buchecker M, Hartig T (2007) Space and place—two aspects of the human-landscape relationship. In: Kienast F, Wildi FO, Ghosh S (eds) A changing world; challenges for landscape research. Landscape Series, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht
Jacobs M (2006) The production of mindscapes: a comprehensive theory of landscape experience. Doctoral thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen
Jennings G (2001) Tourism research. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd, Milton
Junker B, Buchecker M (2008) Aesthetic preferences versus ecological objectives in river restorations. Landscape Urban Plan 85:141–154
Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1982) Cognition and environment: functioning in an uncertain world. Praeger, New York
Kearney AR, Bradley GA, Petrich CH, Kaplan R, Kaplan S, Simpson-Colebank D (2008) Public perception as support for scenic quality regulation in a nationally treasured landscape. Landscape Urban Plan 87:117–128
MacCannell D (1989) The tourist: a new theory of the leisure class. Schocken Books Inc., New York
Manfredo MJ (2008) Who cares about wildlife? Social science concepts for exploring human-wildlife relationships and conservation issues. Springer, New York
van Marwijk RBM (2009) These routes are made for walking: understanding the transactions between nature, recreational behaviour and environmental meanings in Dwingelderveld National Park Dwingelderveld National Park, the Netherlands. Doctoral thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen
van Marwijk RBM, Elands BHM, Lengkeek J (2007) Experiencing nature: the recognition of the symbolic environment within research and management of visitor flows. For Snow Landscape Res 81:59–76
van Marwijk RBM, Elands BHM, Kampen JK, Terlouw S, Pitt DG, Opdam P (2011) Public perceptions of the attractiveness of restored nature. Restor Ecol. doi:10.1111/j.1526-100X.2011.00813.x
Moscovici S (2000) Social representations. Explorations in social psychology. Polity Press, Cambridge
Orians GH (1980) Habitat selection: general theory and applications to human behavior. In: Lockard J (ed) The evolution of human social behavior. Elsevier, Chicago
Peponis J, Wineman J (2002) The spatial structure of environment and behaviour: space syntax. In: Bechtel RB, Churchman A (eds) Handbook of environmental psychology. Wiley, New York
Reckwitz A (2003) Basic elements of a theory of social practices: a perspective in social theory. Zeitschrift fur Soziologie 32:282–301
Roth M (2006) Validating the use of Internet survey techniques in visual landscape assessment-an empirical study from Germany. Landscape Urban Plan 78:179–192
Schama S (1995) Landscape and memory. HarperCollins, London
Schatzki TR (2005) The sites of organizations. Organ Stud 26:465–484
Smeets H, Gadet J (2008) Het Grote Groenonderzoek 2008. Het bezoek aan en gebruik van parken, recreatiegebieden en groen in de woonomgeving van Amsterdam. Dienst Ruimtelijke Ordening en Dienst Onderzoek en Statistiek, Amsterdam
Stenseke M (2009) Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: lessons from Sweden. Land Use Policy 26:214–223
van Trigt A, van Koppen CSA, Schanz H (2003) Spirituele waarden van natuur. Een analyse van de ervaring van spiritualiteit in relatie tot bomen en bos. Landschap 20:155–163
Tuan YF (1974) Topophilia: a study of environmental perception, attitudes, and values. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Ulrich RS (1983) Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In: Altman I, Wohlwill JF (eds) Behavior and the natural environment. Plenum Press, New York
Vining J, Tyler E, Kweon B-S (2000) Public values, opinions, and emotions in restoration controversies. In: Gobster PH, Hull RB (eds) Restoring nature: perspectives from the social sciences and humanities. Island Press, Washington
de Vries S, Roos-Klein Lankhorst JR, Buijs AE (2007) Mapping the attractiveness of the Dutch countryside: a GIS-based landscape appreciation model. For Snow Landscape Res 81:43–58
Wagenaar H, Cook NSD (2003) Understanding policy practices: action, dialectic and deliberation in policy analysis. In: Hajer MA, Wagenaar H (eds) Deliberative policy analysis. Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Westerman MA (2004) Theory and research on practices, theory and research as practices: Hermeneutics and psychological inquiry. J Theor Philos Psychol 24:123–156
Williams KJH, Cary J (2002) Landscape preferences, ecological quality, and biodiversity protection. Environ Behav 34(2):257–274
van der Wulp NY (2008) Belevingswaardenmonitor Nota Ruimte 2006: nulmeting landschap naar gebieden. Wettelijke Onderzoekstaken Natuur & Milieu, Wageningen
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Buijs, A., Elands, B., van Marwijk, R. (2012). Where Management Practices and Experiential Practices Meet: Public Support and Conflict in Ecosystem Management. In: Arts, B., Behagel, J., van Bommel, S., de Koning, J., Turnhout, E. (eds) Forest and Nature Governance. World Forests, vol 14. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5113-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5113-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5112-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5113-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)