Advertisement

Transhuman Athletes and Pathological Perfectionism: Recognising Limits in Sports and Human Nature

  • Michael J. McNamee
Chapter
Part of the International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine book series (LIME, volume 52)

Abstract

In recent discussions in sports and bioethics there it has been suggested that sports may become a site where the modification of human nature itself might be played out. In this essay I explore the desirability of the idea that there might be athletes who could transcend humanity and thus transform sports. I argue that such a desire is a failure to consider the goodness of human and athletic vulnerability. I argue against the idea of the transhuman athlete, and reject it as a form of pathological perfectionism.

Keywords

Human Nature Perfect Performance Regulative Rule Sport Engineer World Championship 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aristotle. 1953. Metaphysics, Book 5 Ch 4; Book 7 Ch 4 (Trans W.D. Ross). Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Berlin, I. 1969. Four essays on liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Best, D. 1978. Philosophy and human movement. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  4. Breivik, G. 2010. Philosophical perfectionism – Consequences and implications for sport. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 4(1): 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, W.M. 1992. Practices and prudence. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport XVII: 71–84.Google Scholar
  6. Daniels, N. 2009. Can anyone really be talking about ethically modifying human nature. In Enhancing human capacities, ed. N. Bostrom and J. Savulescu, 25–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Foot, P. 2001. Natural goodness. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Genetic Technologies. 2009. Sports performance ACTN3 Sports Gene Test_2006 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.gtg.com.au/archives/migration/2/110/383/ACTN3%20web%20brochure.pdf. Last accessed 27 Feb 2009.
  9. Heidegger, M. 1993. The question concerning technology. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  10. Holm, S. 2006. The nature of human welfare. In Future perfect? ed. P.M. Scott and C. Deane-Drummond. London: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
  11. Holm, S. 2007. Naturalness and anthropology in modern bioethics, with a special view to trans- and post-humanism. In Theology and science – Issues for future dialogue, ed. Kragh Helge. Aarhus: University of Aarhus Press.Google Scholar
  12. Holm, S., and M.J. McNamee. 2011. Physical enhancement: What baseline, whose judgement? In Enhancing human capabilities, ed. R.J.H. ter Meulen, G. Kahane, and J. Savulescu, 291–303. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hurka, T. 1993. Perfectionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Juengst, E., et al. 2009. What’s taxonomy got to do with it? ‘Species integrity’, human rights and science policy. In Human enhancement, ed. J. Savulescu and N. Bostrom, 43–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kerr, F. 1997. Immortal longings. London: SPCK.Google Scholar
  16. McKenny, G. 1997. To relieve the human condition. Brockport: SUNY.Google Scholar
  17. McNamee, M.J. 1995. Sporting practices, institutions and virtues: A critique and a restatement. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport XXII: 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McNamee, M.J. 2007. Whose Prometheus?: Transhumanism, biotechnology and the moral topography of sports medicine. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1(2): 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McNamee, M.J. 2008. Sports, virtues and vices. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. McNamee, M.J., and S.D. Edwards. 2006. Transhumanism, medical technology, and slippery slopes. Journal of Medical Ethics 32: 513–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miah, A. 2003. Genetically modified athletes. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Miah, A. 2011. Will London be the first transhuman games? http://www.andymiah.net/2011/01/09/2012-the-first-transhuman-games/. Accessed 18 Mar 2011.
  23. Midgley, G.C.J. 1959. Linguistic rules. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1960: 271–290.Google Scholar
  24. Morgan, W.P. 1993. Leftist theories of sports. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Nussbaum, M.C. 1990. Love’s knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Passmore, J.A. 1970. The perfectibility of man. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  27. Pitsiladis, Y., and G. Wang. 2011. Necessary advances in exercise genomics and likely pitfalls. Journal of Applied Physiology 110: 1150–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reddiford, G. 1981. Morality and the games player. Physical Education Review 4(1): 8–16.Google Scholar
  29. Sandberg, A. 2001. Morphological freedom: Why we not just want it, but need it. http://www.nada.kth.se/∼asa/Texts/MorphologicalFreedom.htm. Last accessed 17 Feb 2012.
  30. Sansome, D. 1992. Greek athletics and the genesis of sports. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  31. Scheffler, I. 1991. In praise of the cognitive emotions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Slote, M.D. 1983. Goods and virtues. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  33. Suits, B. 1978. The grasshopper: Games, life and utopia. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  34. van McNamee, M.J., I. Hilvoorde, A. Mueller, and S. Holm. 2009. Genetic testing and sports medicine ethics. Sports Medicine 39(5): 339–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams, B.A.O. 1995. Making sense of humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Humanities and Law in Healthcare, College of Human and Health SciencesSwansea UniversitySwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations