Advertisement

The Effect of User Experience Factors of Tablet Devices on Behavioral Intention to Purchase in the Experience Zone

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 182)

Abstract

As a place where users experience products and make decisions, the experience zone has become an interesting location. In this research, to analyze user experience (UX) in the experience zone, three user experience factors (readability, mobility and telepresence) and two mediating factors (usability and usefulness) are developed and tested as a user experience model. Also, to predict user behavior, behavioral intention to purchase is added to the model. The model and experiment were constructed to explain how users of a tablet device experience, perceive, and finally, purchase a device via functions and UX factors of the tablet device. To analyze the model, structural equation modeling was used. The results generally supported the suggested model for UX and the experience zone of tablet devices. Empirical and theoretical implications were discussed.

Keywords

user experience mobility telepresence readability usability usefulness behavioral intention to purchase 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schmitt, B.: Experiential Marketing. Journal of Marketing Management 15(1-3) (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lee, S.: A Study on Expression Characteristics of the Experience Marketing Space: Focused on Semiotic Interpretation. Kyoung-Won University, master thesis (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, J.: The iPad and Distribution of News Content. Korean Journal of Newspaper and Broadcasting 473, 6–11 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim, H.: Analysis of inner space of spa based on experiential marketing. Kon-Kuk university, master thesis (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yoo, H.Y.: A study on content planning in corporate public relations ares for optimal user experience. Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, master thesis (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maher, R., Skinner, P.: An Architect’s View of the Station User Experience. In: Australasian Transport Research Forum 2011 Proceedings (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Legris, P., Ingham, J., Collerette, P.: Why Do People Use Information Technology?Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seo, H.S., Song, I.K.: A Study on the Suitability for Acceptance of Tablet Media in the u-Learning Environment: Based on Kano’s Model and IPA Methodology. Journal of Internet Information 12(4), 73–91 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bardin, J.M., Lalanda, P., Escoffier, C., Murphy, A.: Improving User Experience by Infusing Web Technologies into Desktops. In: Proceedings of ACM SPLASH, pp. 225–236 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reif, V.: Usability and User Experience of an Online Service: Case PATIO. Oulu University of Applied Science (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim, T., Biocca, F.: Telepresence via Television: Two Dimensions of Telepresence May Have Different Connections to Memory and Persuasion. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 3(2) (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mallat, N., Rossi, M., Tuunainen, V.K., Oorni, A.: The Impact of Use Situation and Mobility on the Acceptance of Mobile Ticketing Services. In: Proccedings of 39th HICSS on System Science (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Google Report: Tablets Primarily Used for Gaming. Admob (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cronin Jr., J.J., Brady, M.K., Hult, G.T.M.: Assessing the Effects of Quality, Value, and Customer Satisfaction on Consumer Behavioral Intentions in Service Environments. Journal of Retailing 72(2), 193–218 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liaw, S.: Investigating Students’ Perceived Satisfaction, Behavioral Intention, and Effectiveness of E-learning: A Case Study of the Blackboard System. Computers & Education 51, 864–873 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wilson, R., Landoni, M., Gibb, F.: A User-Centered Approach to E-book Design. The Electronic Library 20(4), 322–330 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jackson, C.M., Chow, S., Leitch, R.A.: Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use an Information System. Decision Science 28(2) (1997)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ozok, A.A., Benson, D., Chakraborty, J., Norcio, A.F.: A Comparative Study Between Tablet and Laptop PCs: User Satisfaction and Preferences. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24(3), 329–352 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kakihara, M., Sorensen, C.: Expanding the ‘Mobility’ Concept. SIGGROUP Bulletin 22(3) (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mallat, N., Rossi, M., Tuunainen, V.K., Oorni, A.: An Empirical Investigation of Mobile Ticketing Service Adoption in Public Transportation. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 12, 57–65 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lim, K., Lee, J.: The Study on Puchase Intention of the Mobile Environment. Korean Journal of Information System 15(4), 189–209 (2006)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rodriguesz, N.J., Borges, J.A., Crespo, G., Perez, C., Martinez, C., Colon-Rivera, C.R., Ardin, A.: A Usability Study of Nurses’ Interaction with Tablet PC and PDA Nursing Documentation Applications. In: Proceedings of IASTED-HCI (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Perez, C., Gilerto, M.S.: A Comparative Study of Nurses Accessing Electronic Patient Record Systems with PDAs and Tablet PCs. University of Puerto Rico Mayaguez (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huang, J., Lin, Y., Chuang, S.: Elucidating User Behavior of Mobile Learning. The Electronic Library 25(5), 585–598 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mayer, R.E.: Multimedia Learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 41, 85–139 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dyson, M.C., Kipping, G.J.: The Legibility of Screen Formats: Are Three Columns Better Than One? Computers & Graphics 21(6), 703–712 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chaparro, B.S., Shaikh, A.D., Baker, J.R.: Reading Online Text with a Poor Layout: Is Performance Worse? Usability News 7(1) (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Khedr, A.E., Hana, M.A., Schollar, D.Z.: Investigating Learners’ Acceptance of E-Learning Courses Using Adopted Technology Acceptance ModelGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Poon, W.C., Low, L.T., Yong, G.F.: A Study of Web-based Learning Environment in Malaysia. The International Journal of Educational Management 18(6), 374–385 (2004)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rafaeli, S., Sudweeks, F.: Networked Interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communications 2(4) (1997)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Carlson, K.S., Zhao, G.X.A.: Collaborative Learning: Some Issues and Recommendations. The Centre for the Development of Technological Leadership Conference. National University of Singapore, pp. 24–27 (2004)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee, Y., Kozar, K.A.: Designing Usable Online Stores: A Landscape Preference Perspective. Information & Management 46(1), 31–41 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hall, R.H., Hanna, P.: The Effect of Web Page Text-Background Color Combinations on Retention and Perceived Readability, Aesthetics and Behavioral Intention. In: Proceedings of AMCIS 2003, p. 277 (2003)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life. Basic Books (1997)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Steuer, J.: Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication 42(4), 73–93 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bulu, S.T.: Place Presence, Social Presence, Co-presence, and Satisfaction in Virtual Worlds. Computers & Education 58, 154–161 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Joo, T.J., Lim, K.Y., Kim, E.K.: Online University Students’ Satisfaction and Persistence: Examining Perceived Level of Presence, Usefulness and Ease of Use as Predictors in a Structural Model. Computers & Education 57, 1654–1664 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Novak, T.P., Hoffman, D.L., Yung, Y.: Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach. Marketing Science 19(1), 22–42 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kwon, O., Wen, Y.: An Empirical Study of the Factors Affecting Social Network Service Use. Computers in Human Behavior 26(2), 254–263 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fiore, A.M., Kim, J., Lee, H.: Effect of Image Interactivity Technology on Consumer Responses toward the Online Retailer. Journal of Interactive Marketing 19(3) (2005)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P.: Flow Online: Lessons Learned and Future Prospects. Journal of Interactive Marketing 23, 23–34 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Interaction ScienceSungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations