Advertisement

IPS vs. AMOLED: Effects of Panel Type on Smartphone Users’ Viewing and Reading Experience

  • Ki Joon Kim
  • Eunil Park
  • S. Shyam Sundar
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 182)

Abstract

The present study conducted a 2x2 between-subjects experiment and examined whether users’ viewing and reading experience are affected by the type of display panels (i.e., IPS, AMOLED) that they are exposed to when watching videos and reading text. Despite panel manufacturers’ claims, results from the experiment revealed that users’ oculomotor comfort, enjoyment, perceived display quality, viewing satisfaction, presence, text readability, reading comprehension, and reading satisfaction were not affected by the panel difference. Regardless of the panel type, video watching elicited greater oculomotor comfort, enjoyment, and purchase intention. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Keywords

IPS AMOLED mobile device display panel 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Lyu, J., Sohn, J., Kim, H., Lee, S.: Recent Trends on Patterned Vertical Alignment (PVA) and Fringe-field Switching (FFS) Liquid Crystal Displays for Liquid Crystal Television Applications. Journal of Display Technology 3, 404–412 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Katayama, M.: TFT-LCD Technology. Thin Solid Films 341, 140–147 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    4D System. Introduction to OLED Displays Design Guide for Active Matrix OLED (AMOLED) Displays, http://data.4dsystems.com.au
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Kuhn, R.: Displays for Mobile Communications Enabling New Markets and Applications. Wireless Personal Communications 22, 199–212 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, K.J., Sundar, S.S.: Does Panel Type Matter for LCD Monitors? A Study Examining the Effects of S-IPS, S-PVA, and TN Panels in Video Gaming and Movie Viewing. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6947, pp. 281–288. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Park, T.Y., Lee, C.H., Ha, Y.H.: Evaluation of Color Reproduction Characteristics of TFT-LCD and AMOLED for Mobile Phone. The Journal of the Institute of Electronics Engineers of Korea 45(1), 29–37 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim, K.J., Sundar, S.S., Park, E.: The Effects of Screen-size and Communication Modality on Psychology of Mobile Device Users. In: 29th International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1207–1212. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., Regenbrecht, H.: The Experience of Presence: Factor Analytic Insights. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 10(3), 266–281 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Quinn, A.J., Hu, C., Arisaka, T., Rose, A., Bederson, B.B.: Readability of Scanned Books in Digital Libraries. In: 26th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 705–714. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bernard, M.L., Liao, C.H., Chaparro, B.S., Chaparro, A.: Examining Perceptions of Online Text Size and Typeface Legibility for Older Males and Females. In: 6th Annual International Conference on Industrial Engineering (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., Lilienthal, M.G.: Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3(3), 203–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davis, F.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bian, X.: The Role of Brand Image, Product Involvement, and Knowledge in Explaining Consumer Purchase Behaviour of Counterfeits: Direct and Indirect Effects. European Journal of Marketing 45(1/2), 191–216 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim, J., Park, J.: A Consumer Shopping Channel Extension Model: Attitude Shift toward the Online Store. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 9(1), 106–121 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhang, J., Ghorbani, A.A., Robin, C.: An Improved Familiarity Measurement for Formalization of Trust in E-commerce Based Multiagent Systems. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust, vol. 19 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Interaction ScienceSungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Media Effects Research LaboratoryThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations