Advertisement

Effects of Members’ Perception of Leadership Style and Trust in Leader on Individual Creativity

  • Min Hee Hahn
  • Kun Chang Lee
  • Nam Yong Jo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 181)

Abstract

This research studies how the member’s perception on the leader’s behavior and trust in leader affect individual creativity. Also, we have tested how individual creativity model differs depending on the level of task stress which naturally occurs. To test the research hypotheses, we have carried out the online survey of the employees working in IT companies and analyzed it with PLS(Partial Least Square) method. In the result of research, trust in leader positively influenced individual creativity. Also, the member’s perception had different impact on individual creativity depending on the style of leadership. Finally, we could find that the relationship among these constructs differs depending on the level of task stress.

Keywords

Individual creativity Leadership style Trust in leader Task stress 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Amabile, T.M.: A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In: Staw, B.M., Cummings, L.L. (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 10, pp. 123–167. JAI Press, Greenwich (1988)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bass, B.M.: Bass and Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research and Managerial Applications, pp. 634–657. Free Press, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bidault, F., Castello, A.: Trust and creativity: understanding the role of trust in creativity–oriented joint development. R&D Management 39(3), 259–270 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blake, R.R., Mouton, J.S.: The Managerial Grid. Gulf Publishing, Houston (1964)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, M.H., Chang, Y.C., Hung, S.C.: Social Capital and Creativity in R&D Project Teams. R&D Management 38, 21–34 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chin, W.W.: Issues and Opinion on Structural equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly 22(1) (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chin, W.W.: The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides, G.A. (ed.) Modern Methods for Business Research. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahway (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Falk, R.F., Miller, N.B.: A Primer for Soft Modeling. University of Akron Press, Akron (1992)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Structural Equation Models With Unobservable variables and Measurement Errors. Journal of Marketing Research 18(2), 39–50 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    George, J.M., Zhou, J.: Dual Tuning in a Supportive Context: Joint Contributions of Positive Mood, Negative Mood, and Supervisory Behaviors to Employee Creativity. Academy of Management Journal 50, 605–622 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C.: Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 5th edn. Macmillan, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hinkin, T.R., Schriesheim, C.A.: Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power. Journal of Applied Psychology 74, 561–567 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Likert, R.: The Human Organization: Its Management and Value. L McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mohr, A.T., Puck, J.F.: Role Conflict, General Manager Job Satisfaction and Stress and the Performance of IJVs. European Management Journal 25(1), 25–35 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nyhan, R.C., Marlowe Jr., H.A.: Development and psychometric properties of the organizational trust inventory. Evaluation Review 21(5), 614–635 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Redmond, M.R., Mumford, M.D., Teach, R.: Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 55, 120–151 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stone, A.G., Russell, R.F., Patterson, K.: Transformational versus Servant Leadership: A Difference in Leader Focus. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 25(4), 349–361 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Teo, H.H., Chan, H.C., Wei, K.K., Zhang, Z.: Evaluating information accessibility and community adaptivity features for sustaining virtual learning communities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59(5), 671–697 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tierney, P., Farmer, S., Graen, G.: An Examination of Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Relevance of Traits and Relationships. Personnel Psychology 52, 591–620 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Whitener, E.M., Brodt, S.E., Korsgaard, M.A., Werner, J.M.: Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior. Academy of Management Review 23, 513–530 (1998)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zajonc, R.B.: Social facilitation. Science 149, 269–274 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhou, J., George, J.M.: When Job Dissatisfaction Leads to Creativity: Encouraging the Expression of Voice. Academy of Management Journal 44, 682–697 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business Management UnitLG CNS CO., Ltd.SeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.SKK Business School WCU Professor at Department of Interaction ScienceSungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.SKK Business SchoolSungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations