Advertisement

Exploitation and Exploration as Links between Psychological Empowerment and Creativity

  • Dae Sung Lee
  • Kun Chang Lee
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 181)

Abstract

This paper examines the mediating effect of ambidexterity (exploitation and exploration) between psychological empowerment and creativity. We found that psychological empowerment had strong influence on exploitation, exploration and creativity, and that exploration had a mediating effect between psychological empowerment and creativity. However, exploitation had little influence on creativity for two-tailed test. In this respect, organizations should delegate power to employees to build the high level of innovation and creativity. Moreover, mangers need to heed exploration as a radical innovation in order to increase creativity.

Keywords

Psychological empowerment Exploitation Exploration Creativity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Amabile, T.M.: A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. In: Staw, B.M., Cummings, L.L. (eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 10, pp. 123–167. JAI Press, Greenwich (1988)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amabile, T.M.: Motivating Creativity in Organizations. California Management Review 40(1), 22–26 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ashforth, B.E.: The Experience of Powerlessness In Organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43, 207–242 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Audia, P.G., Goncalo, J.A.: A Study of Inventors in the Hard Disk Drive Industry. Management Science 53(1), 1–15 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bandura, A.: Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory. American Psychologist 44, 1175–1184 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bell, N.E., Staw, B.M.: People as Sculptors versus Sculpture. In: Arthur, M.B., Hall, D.T., Lawrence, B.S. (eds.) Handbook of Career Theory, pp. 232–251. Cambridge University Press, New York (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benner, M.J., Tushman, M.L.: Exploitation, Exploration and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. Academy of Management Review 28, 238–256 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Benner, M.J., Tushman, M.L.: Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries. Administrative Science Quarterly 47, 676–706 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chin, W.W.: The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. In: Marcoulides, G.A. (ed.) Modern Methods for Business Research. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahway (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deci, E.L., Connell, J.P., Ryan, R.M.: Self-Determination in a Work Organization. Journal of Applied Psychology 74, 580–590 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duncan, R.: The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation. In: Killman, R.H., Pondy, L.R., Sleven, D. (eds.) The Management of Organization, vol. 1, pp. 167–188. North Holland, New York (1976)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Falk, R.F., Miller, N.B.: A Premier for Soft Modeling. The University of Akron, Akron (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fornell, C.R.: A Second Generation of Multivariate analysis. Praeger Publishers, New York (1982)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fornell, C.R., Lacker, D.F.: Two Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1), 39–50 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gist, M.: Self-efficacy: Implications for Organizational Behavior And Human Resource Management. Academy of Management Review 12, 472–485 (1987)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    March, J.G.: Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science 2, 71–87 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mom, T.J.M., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W.: Understanding Variation in Managers’ Ambidexterity: Investigating Direct and Interaction Effects of Formal Structure and Personal Coordination Mechanisms. Organization Science 20(4), 812–828 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oldham, G.R., Cummings, A.: Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work. Academy of Management Journal 39, 607–634 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Redmond, M.R., Mumford, M.D., Teach, R.: Putting Creativity to Work: Effects of Leader Behavior on Subordinate Creativity. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes 55, 120–151 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spector, P.E.: Perceived Control by Employees: A Meta-Analysis of Studies Concerning Autonomy and Participation at Work. Human Relations 39, 1005–1016 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spreitzer, G.M.: Psychological Empowerment in The Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement and Validation. Academy of Management Journal 38, 1442–1465 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sternberg, R.J.: The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thomas, K.W., Velthouse, B.A.: Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An ‘Interpretive’ Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation. Academy of Management Review 15, 666–681 (1990)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thomas, K.W., Velthouse, B.A.: Cognitive Elements of Empowerment. Academy of Management Review 15, 666–681 (1990)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Thomas, R.D., Lu, I.R.R., Cedzynski, M.: Partial Least Squares: A Critical Review and a Potential Alternative. In: Proceedings of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada (ASAC) Conference, Toronto, Ont., Canada (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang, X., Bartol, K.: Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation and Creative Process Engagement. Academy of Management Journal 53(1), 107–128 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhou, J., Shalley, C.E.: Expanding the Scope and Impact of Organizational Creativity Research. In: Zhou, J., Shalley, C.E. (eds.) Handbook of Organizational Creativity, pp. 347–368. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SKK Business SchoolSungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.SKK Business School WCU Professor at Department of Interaction ScienceSungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations