Abstract
It is a rather safe statement to claim that the social dimensions of the scientific process are accepted in a fair share of studies in the philosophy of science. It is a somewhat safe statement to claim that the social dimensions are now seen as an essential element in the understanding of what human cognition is and how it functions. But it would be a rather unsafe statement to claim that the social is fully accepted in the philosophy of mathematics. And we are not quite sure what kind of statement it is to claim that the social dimensions in theories of mathematics education are becoming more prominent, compared to the psychological dimensions. In our contribution, we will focus, after a brief presentation of the above claims, on this particular domain to understand the successes and failures of the development of theories of mathematics education that focus on the social and not primarily on the psychological.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atweh, B., Forgasz, H., & Nebres, B. (Eds.). (2001). Socio-cultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Balacheff, N., Bell, A., Bishop, A., Cooney, T., Willibald, D., Hoyles, C., et al. (1990). Future perspectives for research in the psychology of mathematics education. In P. Nesher & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and cognition: A research synthesis by the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education(pp. 135–148). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Barwell, R. (2003). Discursive psychology and mathematics education: Possibilities and challenges. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik – International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 35(5), 201–207.
Bishop, A. J. (1985). The social psychology of mathematics education. In L. Streefland (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th PME international conference(Vol. 2, pp. 1–13). Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University.
Blömeke, S., & Kaiser, G. (2010). Mathematics teacher education and gender effects. In J. H. Forgasz, J. R. Becker, K. H. Lee, & O. B. Steinthorsdottir (Eds.), International perspectives on gender and mathematics education(pp. 263–283). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Burton, L. (Ed.). (2003). Which way social justice in mathematics education?Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger Publishers.
Cobo, P., & Fortuny, J. M. (2000). Social interactions and cognitive effects in contexts of area-comparison problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(2), 115–140.
Fischbein, E. (1990). Introduction. In P. Nesher & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and cognition: A research synthesis by the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education(pp. 1–13). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Forgasz, J. H., Becker, J. R., Lee, K.-H., & Steinthorsdottir, O. B. (Eds.). (2010). International perspectives on gender and mathematics education. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Fuller, S. (1988). Social epistemology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Gates, P. (2006). The place of equity and social justice in the history of PME. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. Past, present and future(pp. 367–402). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Gutiérrez, A., & Boero, P. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. Past, present and future. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Lamb, D., & Easton, S. (1984). Multiple discovery: The pattern of scientific progress. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
Lerman, S. (2006). Socio-cultural research in PME. In A. Gutiérrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education. Past, present and future(pp. 347–366). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Ma, X. (2010). Gender differences in mathematics achievement. Evidence from regional and international student assessments. In J. H. Forgasz, J. R. Becker, K. H. Lee, & O. B. Steinthorsdottir (Eds.), International perspectives on gender and mathematics education(pp. 225–248). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
MacNab, D. (2000). Raising standards in mathematics education: Values, vision, and TIMSS. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42(1), 61–80.
Mancosu, P. (Ed.). (2008). The philosophy of mathematical practice. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
Nersessian, N. J. (2008). Creating scientific concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nesher, P., & Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.). (1990). Mathematics and cognition: A research synthesis by the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Paek, P. L. (2010). Factors contributing to gender differences in mathematics performance of United States high school students. In J. H. Forgasz, J. R. Becker, K. H. Lee, & O. B. Steinthorsdottir (Eds.), International perspectives on gender and mathematics education(pp. 203–224). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Perret-Clermont, A.-N. (1996). La construction de l’intelligence dans l’interaction sociale(fifth revised edition). Berne: Peter Lang.
Rizzolatti, G. (2005). The mirror neuron system and its function in humans. Anatomy and Embryology, 210(5–6), 419–421.
Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neuroscience, 21(5), 188–194.
Steinthorsdottir, O. B., Dadisman, K., Robertson, D. L., & Steinthorsdottir, K. (2010). Mathematics achievement in Icelandic playschools. In J. H. Forgasz, J. R. Becker, K. H. Lee, & O. B. Steinthorsdottir (Eds.), International perspectives on gender and mathematics education(pp. 249–261). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Vale, C. (2010). Gender mainstreaming. Maintaining attention on gender equality. In J. H. Forgasz, J. R. Becker, K. H. Lee, & O. B. Steinthorsdottir (Eds.), International perspectives on gender and mathematics education(pp. 111–143). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Van Kerkhove, B., De Vuyst, J., & Van Bendegem, J. P. (Eds.). (2010). Philosophical perspectives on mathematical practice. London: College Publications.
Van Kerkhove, B., & Van Bendegem, J. P. (Eds.). (2007). Perspectives on mathematical practices. Bringing together philosophy of mathematics, sociology of mathematics, and mathematics education. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Van Moer, A. (2007). Logic and intuition in mathematics and mathematics education. In K. François & J. P. Van Bendegem (Eds.), Philosophical dimensions in mathematics education(pp. 159–179). New York: Springer.
Vergnaud, G. (1990). Epistemology and psychology of mathematics education. In P. Nesher & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics and cognition: A research synthesis by the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education(pp. 14–30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Vithal, R., & Skovsmose, O. (1997). The end of innocence: A critique of ethnomathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34(2), 131–157.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coessens, K., François, K., Van Bendegem, J.P. (2013). Mirror Neuron, Mirror Neuron in the Brain, Who’s the Cleverest in Your Reign? From the Attraction of Psychology to the Discovery of the Social. In: Smeyers, P., Depaepe, M. (eds) Educational Research: The Attraction of Psychology. Educational Research, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5038-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5038-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5037-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5038-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)