Abstract
In the practice of building models, we have encountered a number of methodological areas that need to be addressed in order to make the modelling process more robust, scalable, maintainable and transparent. In the context of modelling socio-technical systems (existing infrastructures and businesses) models are primarily data-driven: they contain heterogeneous agents, numerous assumptions and facts about agents and their environment. The data (the facts and assumptions used in the models) span multiple disciplines and are contributed by multiple domain experts. The focus of this chapter is to present new options for improving the management of model data. The issue of data management will be addressed at two levels: that of researchers who need to collaborate when creating and maintaining the model data, and that of data management within a simulation model. The methods proposed in this chapter rely on the use of Semantic Web technologies and philosophies to address data management issues. It is the goal of Semantic Web to make data understandable and useful for both machines and humans. In this chapter we will discuss the complications of modelling socio-technical systems and suggest uses of Semantic Web technologies to aid both collaboration between the modellers and knowledge management for the agents.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Protege 4 does not support SPARQL.
- 3.
- 4.
Within a namespace http://shareddata/. AÂ namespace is an abstract container or environment created to hold a logical grouping of unique identifiers or symbols (i.e. names), see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namespace_(computer_science).
References
Allemang, D., & Hendler, J. A. (2008). Semantic web for the working ontologist: modeling in RDF, RDFS and OWL. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann.
Antoniou, G., & Harmelen, F. V. (2008). AÂ semantic Web primer. In Cooperative information systems (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bergman, M. (2009). Advantages and myths of RDF. http://www.mkbergman.com/483/advantages-and-myths-of-rdf/.
Brickley, D., & Guha, R. (2004). RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF schema. Online. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/.
Brooks, R. (1986). A robust layered control system for a mobile robot. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2(1), 14–23.
Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. M. (1994). Design patterns: elements of reusable object-oriented software, 1 ed. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Klyne, G., Carroll, J. J., & McBride, B. (2004). Resource description framework (RDF): concepts and abstract syntax. W3C recommendation 10. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/.
Knublauch, H. (2009). SPIN box: A SPARQL-based computer game engine. URL: http://composing-the-semantic-web.blogspot.com/2009/01/spin-box-sparql-based-computer-game.html.
Kwak, J., Kang, Y., & Lee, Y. H. (2009). Implementation of a modeling and simulation tool for supporting RFID-based information system design. In Proceedings of the Asia Pacific industrial engineering and management systems conference (APIEMS2009), Kitakyushu, Japan (pp. 1630–1636).
Matheus, C. J., Ulicny, B., Kokar, M. M., Baclaawski, K., Ng, W., Lau, L., Letkowski, J., Weyman, J., Dionne, R., & Parent, D. (2009). Situational behavior modeling. Technical report, Ft. Belvoir, Defense Technical Information Center. URL: http://stinet.dtic.mil/oai/oai?&verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA513027.
McGuinness, D. L., & van Harmelen, F. (2004). OWL web ontology language overview. Online. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/.
Mikulecky, D. C. (2001). The emergence of complexity: science coming of age or science growing old? Computers and Chemistry, 25(4), 341–348.
Prud’hommeaux, E., & Seaborne, A. (2008). SPARQL query language for RDF. W3C recommendation. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query.
SPARQL query language for RDF (2008). W3C Recommendation. URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/.
van Dam, K. H. (2009). Capturing socio-technical systems with agent-based modelling. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands. ISBN 978-90-79787-12-8.
Wulf, W., & Shaw, M. (1973). Global variable considered harmful. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 8(2), 28–34.
Zhou, Q., Prasanna, V., Chang, H., & Wang, Y. (2010). AÂ semantic framework for integrated modeling and simulation of transportation systems. Relation, 10(1.116), 3458.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chmieliauskas, A., Davis, C.B., Bollinger, L.A. (2013). Next Steps in Modelling Socio-technical Systems: Towards Collaborative Modelling. In: van Dam, K., Nikolic, I., Lukszo, Z. (eds) Agent-Based Modelling of Socio-Technical Systems. Agent-Based Social Systems, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4933-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4933-7_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4932-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4933-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)