The General Philosophy of Artificial Adaptive Systems



The philosophy of the artificial adaptive system is described and compared with natural language. Some parallels are striking. The artificial sciences create models of reality, but how well they approximate the “real world” determines their effectiveness and usefulness. This chapter provides a clear understanding of expectations from using this technology, an appreciation for the complexities involved, and the need to continue forward with a mind open to unexpected and unknown potential. Supervised and unsupervised networks are described.


  1. Anderson, J. A., & Rosenfeld, E. (Eds.). (1988). Neurocomputing foundations of research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arbib, M. A. (Ed.). (1995). The handbook of brain theory and neural networks, A Bradford book. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Buscema, M. (1998). Artificial neural networks and complex social systems (Special issue: I. Theory: 33(1), II. Models: 33(2), III. Applications: 33(3), Substance Use & Misuse), New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  4. Buscema, M., & Semeion Group. (1999). Reti Neurali Artificiali e Sistemi Sociali Complessi (vol. I: Teoria e Modelli, vol. II: Applicazioni). Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
  5. Carpenter, G. A., & Grossberg, S. (1991). Pattern recognition by self-organizing neural network. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Grossberg, S. (1978). How does the brain build a cognitive code? Psychological Review, 87, 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hopfield, J. J. (1984). Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Bioscience, 81, 3088–3092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hopfield, J. J. (1988). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 79, 2554–2558. (Reprinted from Neurocomputing foundations of research, by J. A. Anderson & E. Rosenfeld, Eds., 1988, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)Google Scholar
  9. Hopfield, J. J., & Tank, D. W. (1985). Neural computation of decisions in optimization problems. Biological Cybernetics, 52, 141–152.Google Scholar
  10. Hopfield, J. J., & Tank, D. W. (1986). Computing with neural circuits: A model. Articles Science, 233, 625–633.Google Scholar
  11. Kohonen, T. (1988). Correlation matrix memories. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-21, 353–359. (Reprinted from Neurocomputing foundations of research, by J. A. Anderson & E. Rosenfeld, Eds., 1988, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.)Google Scholar
  12. Minsky, M. (1954). Neural nets and the brain-model problem. Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  13. Minsky, M., & Papert, S. (1988). Perceptrons. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press (Extended edition).Google Scholar
  14. Reetz, B. (1993, May). Greedy solution to the Travelling Sales Person Problem. ATD, 2.Google Scholar
  15. Rosenblatt, F. (1962). Principles of neurodynamics. New York: Spartan.Google Scholar
  16. Rumelhart, D. E., & Mcclelland, J. L. (Eds.). (1986). Parallel distributed processing (vol. 1: Foundations, explorations in the microstructure of cognition; Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models). Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Werbos, P. (1974). Beyond regression: New tools for prediction and analysis in behavioral sciences. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Semeion Research Center of Sciences of CommunicationRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations