Advertisement

University Engagement with Socially Excluded Communities

Towards the Idea of ‘The Engaged University’
  • Paul BenneworthEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

There appears to be an almost overwhelming consensus that an increasingly important element of the role of universities in contemporary society is to provide useful knowledge and contribute to emerging societal problems. However, the scale of the academic analysis to date has been surprising in its limitations, focusing individual universities rather than universities as institutions within social systems. This results in slippery rhetorics where universities promote their activities rather than focusing on delivering socially useful knowledge. This chapter explores how universities as societal institutions evolve in parallel with broad transformation in society. The chapter argues that these transformations are placing increasing pressures on universities to engage with society and to seek external validation of the wider benefits of that engagement. To make sense of how these transformations have impacted on the way how universities deliver their societal mission, we focus on one particular form of engagement, with socially excluded communities. The second part of this chapter focuses on excluded communities, and in particular seeks to understand them in their own terms, as communities with agency and interests rather than purely as potential beneficiaries of services which universities may provide. The chapter argues that there is a need to understand higher education societal engagement in terms of the inter-relation of various systemic elements, including the formal engagement activities, the academic communities, the epistemic communities and the policy environment. Moreover, policy should place more focus on understanding and managing higher education as a system rather than as competing elements, and seek to guide that system towards a successful wider transformation.

Keywords

Social Exclusion Community Engagement Knowledge Society Grand Challenge Epistemic Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter draws on within the Economic and Social Research Council funded project ‘Universities and excluded communities’, part of the Regional Impacts of Higher Education Initiative. This Initiative is co-funded by the Higher Education Funding Councils for England and Wales, the Scottish Funding Council and the Department for Education and Learning Northern Ireland. Many thanks also to Themis Chronopoulos for a fascinating correspondence pointing me towards the urban justice and politics literature related to Columbia University.

References

  1. Ackoff, J. (1999). Ackoff’s best: His classic writings on management. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Acquino Febrillet, M. (2006). Las reformas de Córdoba: 88 años después. DiárioDigitalRD (Dominican Republic). http://diariodigital.com.do/?module=displaystory&story_id=6187&format=html. Accessed 2 Feb 2009.
  3. Allen, J. (2002). Living on thin abstraction: more power/economic knowledge. Environment and Planning A, 34(4), 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, C. (2008). Housing market renewal and social class. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Allen, M. (1988). The goals of universities. Milton Keynes: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Allum, P. (1995). State and society in western Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, B. R. O’G. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  8. Arbo, P., & Benneworth, P. S. (2007). Understanding the regional contribution of higher education institutions: A literature review OECD education working paper 2007/09. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barnett, R. (2000). Realising a compact for higher education. In K. Moti Gokulsing & C. DaCosta (Eds.), A compact for higher education. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  10. Barnett, R. (2003). Beyond all reason: Living with ideology in the university. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education, Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bartlett, W., & Le Grand, J. (1993). Quasi-markets and social policy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Baumunt, Z. (1997). Universities: Old, new and different. In A. Smith & F. Webster (Eds.), The post-modern university? Contested visions of higher education in society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Beck, U. (2000). The brave new world of work. London: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1996). Individualisation and ‘precarious freedoms’: Perspectives and controversies of a subject-oriented sociology. In P. Heelas, S. Lash, & P. Morris (Eds.), De-traditionalisation: Critical reflections on authority and identity at a time of uncertainty. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Bender, T. (1988). Introduction. In T. Bender (Ed.), The university and the city. From medieval origins to the present (pp. 3–10). New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Benneworth, P. S., Charles, D. R., Conway, C., Hodgson, C., & Humphrey, L. (2009a). How the societal impact of universities can be improved both conceptually and practically In Sharing research agendas on knowledge systems: Final research proceedings. UNESCO: Paris, France.Google Scholar
  17. Benneworth, P. S., Coenen, L., Moodyson, J., Asheim, B. (2009b). Exploring the multiple roles of Lund University in strengthening the scania regional innovation system: towards institutional learning? European Planning Studies, 17(11), 1645–1664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Benneworth, P. S., & Hospers, G.-J. (2007). Urban competitiveness in the knowledge economy: Universities as new planning animateurs. Progress in Planning, 67(2), 99–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bleiklie, I. (1998). Justifying the evaluative state. New public management ideals in higher education. European Journal of Education, 33(3), 299–316.Google Scholar
  20. Bleiklie, I. (2007). The social foundations of the evaluative state and the universities as stakeholder organizations. In I. Enders & F. van Vught (Eds.), Towards a cartography of higher education policy change. Enschede: CHEPS Press.Google Scholar
  21. Bok, D. (1984). Beyond the ivory tower social responsibilities of the modern university. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Bok, D. (1990). Universities and the future of America. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. New York: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Bradley, K. (2007). Creating local elites: The University Settlement Movement, National Elites and Citizenship in London, 1884–1940. In S. Couperus, C. Smith, & D. J. Wolffram (Eds.), Control of the city: Local elites and the dynamics of urban politics, 1800–1960 (pp. 81–92). Groningen Studies in Cultural Change (28). Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
  25. Bradley, S. M. (2009). Harlem vs. Columbia University. Black student power in the late 1960s. Chicago: University of Illonois Press.Google Scholar
  26. Bridgman, T., & Wilmott, H. (2007). Academics in the ‘knowledge economy’: From expert to intellectual? In A. Harding, A. Scott, S. Laske, & C. Burtscher (Eds.), Bright satanic mills: Universities, regional development and the knowledge economy, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  27. Bush, V. (1945). Science: The endless frontier. Washington: United States Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  28. Byrne, D. (2005). Social exclusion (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Cameron, S. (2003). Gentrification, housing redifferentiation and urban regeneration: ‘going for growth’ in Newcastle upon Tyne. Urban Studies, 20(12), 2367–2382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Carriere, M. (2011). Fighting the war against blight: Columbia University, Morningside Heights, Inc., and Counterinsurgent Urban Renewal. Journal of Planning History, 10, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI). (1982). The university and the community: The problems of changing relationships. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  32. CHEPS, INCHER, NIFU-STEP (2009). Progress in higher education reform across Europe Governance Reform. Brussels: DG.Google Scholar
  33. Chronopoulos, T. (2011). Spatial regulation in New York city: From urban renewal to zero tolerance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Clark, B. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Pergamon/IAU Press.Google Scholar
  35. Cobb, D. P., & Rubin, B. A. (2006). Contradictory interests, tangled power and disorganized organization. Administration & Society, 38(1), 79–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Commission of the European Communities (CEC). (2003). The role of the universities in the Europe of knowledge COM(2003) 58 final. Luxembourg: OOPEC.Google Scholar
  37. Cornford, J., & Pollock, N. (2003). Putting the university online: Information, technology and organizational change. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Cortez Ruiz, C. (2008). Challenges and operations for university-based civic service in Latin America. In GUNI (Ed.), Higher education in the world 3: New challenges and emerging roles for human and social development. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. Daalder, H. (1982). The sudden revolution and the sluggish aftermath: A retrospective since 1968. In H. Daalder & E. Shils (Eds.), Universities, politicians and bureaucrats: Europe and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Delanty, G. (2002). The university and modernity: A history of the present. In K. Robins & F. Webster (Eds.), The virtual university: Knowledge, markets and management. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
  41. Engels, F. (1845). The condition of the working class in England (1982 ed. in translation). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  42. Ernste, H. (2007). The international network university of the future and its local and regional impacts. In A. Harding, A. Scott, S. Laske, & C. Burtscher (Eds.), Bright satanic mills: universities, regional development and the knowledge economy. Aldershot: AshgateGoogle Scholar
  43. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University–industry–government innovation in action. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Eurostat (2010). Combating poverty and social exclusion. A statistical portrait of the European Union 2010. Luxembourg: OOPEC.Google Scholar
  45. Eurydice (2008). Higher education governance in Europe. Policies, funding, structures and academic staff. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/091EN.pdf. Accessed 4 Nov. 2010.
  46. Ferlie, E., Pettigrew, A., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L. (1996). The new public management in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Fryer, R. H. (chairman) (1999). Creating learning cultures: Next steps in achieving the learning age. Second report of The National Advisory Group for Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning. London: NAGCELL.Google Scholar
  48. Goddard, J. B. (2005a). Supporting the contribution of HEIs to regional developments project overview. Paper presented to OECD/IMHE Conference, Paris, 6–7 January.Google Scholar
  49. Goddard J. B. (2005b). Institutional management and engagement with the knowledge society higher education. Management and Policy, 17(1), 23–41.Google Scholar
  50. Granovetter, M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology 91(3), 481–510.Google Scholar
  51. Greenwood, D. (2007). Who are the real problem-owners. In A. Harding, A. Scott, S. Laske, & C. Burtscher (Eds.), Bright satanic mills: Universities, regional development and the knowledge economy. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  52. Gysels, G., & van den Eynde, M. (1955). Nieuwste tijden (1848–1955), Geschiedenis van België. Liège: Sciences et Lettres.Google Scholar
  53. Harvie, C. (1994). The rise of regional Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. IPR News (2009). Across decades and disciplines forty years of policy-relevant research at IPR. Fall, 31, 1. Available online at http://www.ipr.northwestern.edu/publications/newsletter/iprn0909/decadesanddisciplines.html.  Accessed 15 Feb 2012.
  55. Jongbloed, B., Lepori, B., Benninghoff, M., Salerno, C., Slipersaeter, S. (2007). Changing models and patterns of higher education funding: Some empirical evidence. In A. Bonaccorsi & C. Daraio (Eds.), Universities and strategic knowledge creation. specialization and performance in Europe (pp. 85–111). Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  56. Kagan, C. (2007). Interpersonal skill and reflection as the core of transformational change in regeneration? Regions, 265, 12–15.Google Scholar
  57. Kickert, W. (1995). Steering at a distance: A new paradigm of public governance in Dutch higher education. Governance, 8, 135–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E. H., Koppenjan, J. F. M. (Eds.). (1997). Managing complex networks. Strategies for the public sector (1st ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  60. Landes, D. (1997). The wealth and poverty of nations. London: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
  61. Latour, B, & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Leach, R. (2002). Political ideology in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  63. Longden, B. (2001). Funding policy in higher education: Contested terrain. Research Papers in Education, 16(2), 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lotz, J., & Welton, M. R. (1997). Father Jimmy. The life and times of Father Jimmy Tompkins (pp. 169). Wreck Cove: Breton Books.Google Scholar
  65. McClelland, C. E. (1988). ‘To Live for Science’: Ideals and realities at the University of Berlin. In: T. Bender (Ed.), The university and the city. From medieval origins to the present (pp. 181–197). New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. McDowell, G. (2001). Land grant universities and extension into the 21st Century: Negotiating or abandoning a social contract. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Maassen, P. A. M. (1996). Governmental steering and the academic culture. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom.Google Scholar
  68. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  69. Milward, B. (2003). Globalisation? Internationalisation and monopoly capitalism: Historical processes and capitalist dynamism. Cheltenham: EdwardElgar.Google Scholar
  70. Molas-Gallart, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A., Duran, X. (2002). Measuring third stream activities. Final report to the Russell Group of Universities. Brighton: SPRU, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  71. Montesinos, P., Carot, J. M., Martinez, J.-M., Mora, F. (2008). Third mission ranking for world class universities: Beyond teaching and research. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2), 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Morgan, R. (2004). Perseverance. The story of Cape Breton’s University College (p. 208). Sydney: University College of Cape Breton Press.Google Scholar
  73. Moulaert, F. (2000). Globalization and integrated area development in European cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Neave, G., & van Vught F. A. (Eds.) (1991). Prometheus bound: The changing relationship between government and higher education in Western Europe. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  75. OECD (2007). Higher education and regions: Globally competitive, regionally engaged. Paris, OECD/IMHE.Google Scholar
  76. OECD (2008). Tertiary education for the knowledge society: Volume 1: Special features: Governance, funding, quality. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  77. Olsen, J. P. (1988). Administrative reform and theories of organization. In C. Campbell & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Organizing governance: Governing organizations (pp. 233–254). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  78. Peck J, & Jones M. (1995). Training and enterprise councils: Schumpeterian workfare state, or what? Environment and Planning A, 27(9), 1361–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalising space. Antipode, 34, 380–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pellings, P. (1997). The evolution of Dutch consociationalism, 1917–1997, The Netherlands. Journal of Social Sciences, 33, 9–26.Google Scholar
  81. Perry, D., & Wiewel, W. (2005) (Eds.). The university as urban developer: Case studies and analysis. New York: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  82. Phillipson, N. T. (1974). Culture and society in the 18th century province: The case of Edinburgh and the Scottish Enlightenment. In L. Stone (Ed.), The university in society: Volume II—Europe, Scotland and the United States from the 16th to the 20th century (pp. 407–448). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Pinheiro, R., Benneworth, P., Jones, G. A. (2012). Universities and regional development. A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  84. Prins, E. (2005). Framing conflict in a community-university partnership. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(1), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-term growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Romer, P. M. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rüegg, W. (1992). Themes. In H. de Ridder-Symoens (Ed.), A history of the University in Europe (pp. 3–34). Cambridge Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Sabel, C. F. (1994). Flexible specialisation and the re-emergence of regional economies. In A. Amin, (Ed.), Post-Fordism: A reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  90. Scott, P. (2007). The ‘nationalisation’ of UK universities 1963–2007. In J. Enders & F. van Vught (Eds.), Towards a cartography of higher education policy change. Enschede: UT/CHEPS.Google Scholar
  91. Sen, A. (2000). Social exclusion: Concept, application, and scrutiny (Social development Papers No. 1). Manila: Office of Environment and Social Development, Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  92. Silver, H. (1995). Reconceptualizing social disadvantage: Three paradigms of social exclusion. In G. Rodgers, C. Gore, & J. Figueiredo (Eds.), Social exclusion: Rhetoric, reality, responses. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.Google Scholar
  93. Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  94. Solow, R. (1994). Perspectives on growth theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Stoeger, H. (2009). Processes of social exclusion in the housing markets—Some considerations on a complex issu. Paper presented to Understanding and Shaping Regions: Spatial, Social and Economic Futures, Regional Studies Association International Conference, Leuven, Flanders, 6–8 April 2009.Google Scholar
  96. Temple, J. (1998). The new growth evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(1), 112–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Thiel, V. (2009). Doorstep robbery. In Why the UK needs a fair lending law. London: New Economics Foundation.Google Scholar
  98. van Vught F. A., & Westerheijden, D. (2010). Multidimensional ranking: a new transparency tool for higher education and research. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(3), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wacquant, L. D. (1999). Urban marginality in the coming millennium. Urban Studies, 36(10), 1639–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Watson, D. (2007). Managing civic and community engagement. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Higher Education Policy StudiesUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations