Advertisement

Zoo Talk pp 37-51 | Cite as

Visitors’ Knowledge of Zoos

  • Patricia G. Patrick
  • Sue Dale Tunnicliffe
Chapter

Abstract

Even though research in how and what people learn in zoos has become a focus in the past 20 years, future research needs to evaluate the basic biology and conservation knowledge visitors bring to the zoo. If zoo education programs pose a better understanding of what children know and think about the roles and purposes of zoological institutions, then zoo educators will have a construct upon which to scaffold educational material. The public’s knowledge of zoos is addressed in this chapter by (1) identifying the zoo visitor and their reasons for visiting the zoo, (2) determining the visitor’s perceptions of nature, (3) describing the importance of mental models, and (4) defining a model of the divergent and nonscientific knowledge and understandings people have of zoos. Providing a model of the knowledge or understandings people hold regarding zoos is an important tool that may be used when developing educational interactions. Moreover, this chapter defines the components of the informal learning model: (1) definition, (2) image, (3) interaction, and (4) information. The student’s mental model is molded by the informal learning experience.

Keywords

Mental Model Informal Learning Biological Conservation Zoological Institution Conservation Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acampora, R. (2005). Zoos and eyes: Contesting captivity and seeking successor practices. Society and Animals, 13(1), 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ascione, F. (1992). Enhancing children's attitudes about the humane treatment of animals: Generalized to human-directed empathy. Anthrozoos, 5(3), 176–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Askue, L., Heimlich, J., Yu, J., Wang, X., & Lakly, S. (2009). Measuring a professional conservation education training program for zoos and wildlife parks in China. Zoo Biology, 28(5), 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Association of Zoos & Aquariums (AZA). (2011, January 12). AZA 5-year strategic plan. Retrieved from http://www.aza.org/StrategicPlan/
  5. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  6. Bakhurst, D., & Shanker, S. (2001). Jerome Bruner: Language, culture and self. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  7. Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., Hughes, K., & Dierking, L. (2007, July). Conservation learning in wildlife tourism settings: Lessons from research in zoos and aquariums. Environmental Education Research, 13(3), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Balmford, A. (1999). (Less and less) great expectations. Oryx, 33, 87–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Balmford, A., Clegg, L., Coulson, T., & Taylor, J. (2002). Why conservationists should heed Pokémon? Science, 295, 2367–2371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertram, B. (2004). Misconceptions about zoos. Biologist, 51(4), 199–206.Google Scholar
  11. Birney, B. (1988). Brookfield zoo’s flying walk exhibit: Formative evaluation aids in the development of an interactive exhibit in an informal learning setting. Environment & Behavior, 20(4), 416–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Birney, B. (1991). The impact of bird discovery point on visitors’ attitudes toward bird conservation issues. Brookfield, IL: Chicago Zoological Society.Google Scholar
  13. Bitgood, S., Formwalt, D., Zimmerman, C., & Patterson, D. (1993). The Noah’s Ark dilemma: zoo visitors’ ratings of how much animals are worth saving. Journal of the International Association of Zoo Educators, 27, 41–43.Google Scholar
  14. Bogner, F. (1999). Empirical evaluation of an educational conservation program introduced in Swiss secondary schools. International Journal of Science Education, 21(11), 1169–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Borun, M., Massey, C., & Lutter, T. (1992). Naive knowledge and the design of science museum exhibits. Philadelphia: Franklin Institute Science Museum.Google Scholar
  16. Boud, J., Keough, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Understanding your visitors: Ten factors that influence visitor behavior. Jacksonville, AL: Jacksonville State University.Google Scholar
  17. Boulter, C., Tunnicliffe, S., & Reiss, M. (2003). Probing children’s understanding of the natural world. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Conference, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  18. Bowers, C. (1997). The culture of denial: Why the environmental movement needs strategy for reforming universities and public schools. New York: Suny.Google Scholar
  19. Boyle, P. (2005, April 14). Association of zoos and aquariums conference. Knoxville, TN. Speaker.Google Scholar
  20. Buckley, B., Boulter, C., & Gilbert, J. (1997). Towards a typology of models for science Education. In Gilbert, J. (Ed.), Exploring models and modelling in science and technology education (pp. 90–105). Reading, MA: University of Reading New Bulmershe Papers.Google Scholar
  21. Cain, L., & Meritt, D. (2007). The demand for zoos and aquariums. Tourism Review International, 11(3), 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chicago Zoological Society and Lincoln Park Zoological Society. (1993). Conservation related perceptions, attitudes, and behavior of adult visitors and nonvisitors to Brookfield Zoo and Lincoln Park Zoo. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  23. Chizar, D., Murphy, J., & Lliff, N. (1990). For zoos. Psychological Record, 40, 3–13.Google Scholar
  24. Churchman, D., & Marcoulides, G. (1991). Affective response to zoo exhibits. Paper presented at the Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums conference, Wheeling, WV.Google Scholar
  25. Clayton, S., Fraser, J., & Saunders, C. D. (2009). Zoo experiences: Conversations, connections, and concern for animals. Zoo Biology, 28, 377–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Coburn, W. (1995). Everyday thoughts about nature: An interpretive study of 16 ninth graders’ conceptualizations of nature. In Proceedings of Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  27. Croke, V. (1997). The modern ark: The story of zoos, past, present and future. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  28. Dallas Zoo. (2011, May 17). Conservation education and science. Retrieved from http://www.dallaszooed.com/kidcamps/preschool.html
  29. Damon, W. (1991). Problems of direction in socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 384–397). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Darabi, A., Nelson, D., & Seel, N. (2010). Learning and instruction in the digital age. In J. Spector, D. Ifenthaler, P. Isaias, & D. Sampson (Eds.), The role of supportive information in the development and progression of mental models. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  31. Davey, G. (2006). An hourly variation in zoo visitor interest: Measurement and significance for animal welfare research. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 9(3), 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. de White, G., & Jacobson, S. (1994). Evaluating conservation education programs at a South American zoo. Journal of Environmental Education, 25(4), 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Durkheim, E. (1938). Rules of sociological method. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  34. Eagles, P., & Muffitt, S. (1990). An analysis of children’s attitudes toward animals. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 41–44.Google Scholar
  35. Ewert, A., & McAvoy, L. (1994). Outdoor education research: Implications for social/educational and natural resource policy. In L. McAvoy, L. Stringer, & A. Ewert (Eds.), Coalition for education in the outdoors second research symposium proceedings. Cortland, NY: Coalition for Education in the Outdoors.Google Scholar
  36. Falk, J. (2009). Identity and the museum visitor experience. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  37. Falk, J., & Dierking, L. (2010). The 95 percent solution: School is not where most Americans learn most of their science. American Scientist, 98, 486–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Falk, J. H., Reinhard, E. M., Vernon, C. L., Bronnenkant, K., Heimlich, J. E., & Deans, N. L. (2007). Why zoos and aquariums matter: Assessing the impact of a visit to a zoo or aquarium. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos and Aquariums.Google Scholar
  39. Frost, W. (2010). Zoos and tourism: Conservation, education, entertainment? Bristol, UK: Channel View Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Garnham, A. (1997). Representing information in mental models. In M. Conway (Ed.), Cognitive model of memory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Gwynne, J. (2004). Inspiration for conservation: Motivating audiences to care. Presented in Proceedings Catalysts for Conservation: A Direction for Zoos in the 21st Century. London Zoo: Zoological Society of London.Google Scholar
  42. Habhan, G. P., & Trimble, S. (1994). The geography of childhood: Why children need wild places. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  43. Hancocks, D. (2001). A different nature: The paradoxical world of zoos and their uncertain future. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Heimlich, J. E. (1996). Adult learning in nonformal institutions. Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education.Google Scholar
  45. Hinsz, V. B. (1990). A conceptual framework for a research program on groups as information processors. A technical report submitted to the Logistics and Human Factors Division, AF Human Resources Division, AF Human Resources Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH.Google Scholar
  46. Hunt, G. (1993). Environmental education and zoos. Journal of the International Association of Zoo Educators, 29, 74–77.Google Scholar
  47. Hutchins, M., & Conway, W. (1995). Beyond Noah's Ark; The evolving role of modern zoological parks and aquariums in field conservation. International Zoo Yearbook, 34, 117–130. London: The Zoological Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jenner, N. (2003). A communications strategy for Jersey Zoo within the context of the visiting public. Report to the Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, Jersey Island, UK.Google Scholar
  49. Kahn, P., & Friedman, B. (1995). Environmental views and values of children in an inner-city Black community. Child Development, 66, 1403–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kearney, A., & Kaplan, S. (1997). Toward a methodology for the measurement of knowledge structures of ordinary people: The conceptual content cognitive cap (3CM). Environment and Behaviour, 29(5), 579–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kellert, S. R. (1980). Phase II: Activities of the American public relating to animals. United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
  52. Kellert, S., & Westervelt, M. (1983). Children’s attitudes, knowledge and behaviors toward animals: Phase V. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
  53. Kellert, S., & Wilson, E. (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  54. LaHart, D. E. (1978). The Influence of knowledge on young people's perceptions about wildlife. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, College of Education, Tallahassee, FL.Google Scholar
  55. Levinson, B. (1969). Pet-oriented child psychotherapy. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  56. Louv, R. (2006). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.Google Scholar
  57. Marino, L., Lilienfeld, S., Malamud, R., Nobis, N., & Broglio, R. (2010). Do zoos and aquariums promote attitude change in visitors? A critical evaluation of the American zoo and aquarium study. Society & Animals, 18(2), 126–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mayer, R. E., Moreno, R., Boire, M., & Vagge, S. (1999). Maximizing constructivist learning from multimedia communication by minimizing cognitive load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 638–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Morgan, J. M., & Hodgkinson, M. (1999). The motivation and social orientation of visitors attending a contemporary zoological park. Environment & Behavior, 31, 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Morris, D. J. (1961). Automatic at London Zoo seal-feeding apparatus at London Zoo. International Zoo Yearbook, 2(1), 70.Google Scholar
  61. Moss, A., Esson, M., & Bazley, S. (2010). Applied research and zoo education: The evolution and evaluation of a public talks program using unobtrusive video recording of visitor behavior. Visitor Studies, 13(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nabhan, G. P., & Trimble, S. (1994). The geography of childhood. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  63. Naherniak, C. (1995). Profound encounters: Classroom animals–more than responsible pet care. Clearing, 91, 12–15. ERIC EJ540104.Google Scholar
  64. Ogden, J., & Heimlich, J. (2009). Why focus on zoo and aquarium education? Zoo Biology, 28(5), 357–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Patrick, P. (2010, September). What middle school students know about zoos. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Houston, TX.Google Scholar
  66. Patrick, P., Matthews, C., Ayers, D., & Tunnicliffe, S. (2007). Conservation and education: Prominent themes in mission zoo mission statements? Journal of Environmental Education, 38(3), 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Patrick, P., Matthews, C., Tunnicliffe, S., & Ayers, D. (2007). Mission statements of AZA accredited zoos: Do they say what we think they say? International Zoo News, 54(2), 90–98.Google Scholar
  68. Patrick, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. (2009, September). Zoo acuity model. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  69. Patrick, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. (2011). What plants and animals do early childhood and primary students’ name? Where do they see them? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 630–642.Google Scholar
  70. Price, E., Ashmore, L., & McGivern, A. (1994). Reactions of zoo visitors to free-ranging monkeys. Zoo Biology, 13, 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Resnick, L. B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ross, S., & Gillespie, K. (2009). Influences on visitor behavior at a modern immersive zoo exhibit. Zoo Biology, 28, 462–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rumelhart, D., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J., & Hinton, G. E. (1986). Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In J. McClelland, D. Rumelhart, & The PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing. Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 7–57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  74. Seel, N. (1995). Mental models, knowledge transfer, and teaching strategies. Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems, 12(3), 197–213.Google Scholar
  75. Seel, N. (2001). Epistemology, situated cognition, and mental models: “Like a bridge over troubled water. Instructional Science, 29, 403–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shepard, P. (1982). Nature and madness. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
  77. Simmons, D. (1994). Urban children’s preferences for nature: Lessons for environmental education. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 11, 194–203.Google Scholar
  78. Smith, E. (1991). A conceptual change model of learning science. In S. Glynn, R. Yeany, & B. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 43–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  79. Smith, L., Curtis, J., & Van Dijk, P. (2010). What the zoo should ask: The visitor perspective on pro-wildlife behavior attributes. Curator: The Museum Journal, 53(3), 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stevens, B., Sams, K., & Ogden, J. (2004). Catalyzing conservation: The backyard approach. Presented at the Proceedings of the Catalysts for Conservation: A Direction for Zoos in the 21st Century. London Zoo: Zoological Society of London.Google Scholar
  81. Surinova, M. (1971). An analysis of popularity of animals. International Zoo Yearbook, 11(1), 165–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Swanagan, J. (2000). Factors influencing zoo visitors' conservation attitudes and behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(4), 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Thurston, B. (1995, January 1). Zoo-do economics. Pittsburgh Business Times, p. 5.Google Scholar
  84. Tunncliffe, S., & Reiss, M. (1999). Building a model of the environment: How do children see animals? Journal of Biological Education, 33, 142–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1996a). Conversations within primary school parties visiting animal specimens in a museum and zoo. Journal of Biological Education, 30(2), 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1996b). A comparison of conversations of primary school groups at animated, preserved and live animal specimens. Journal of Biological Education, 30(3), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1996c). The relationship between pupil’s ages and the content of conversations generated at three types of animal exhibits. Research in Science Education, 26(4), 461–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1997). The effect of the presence of two adults – Chaperones or teachers – on the content of the conversations of primary school groups during school visits to a Natural History Museum. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 9(1), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tunnicliffe, S. (2000). What sense do children make of three-dimensional, life sized representations of animals? School Science and Mathematics, 100(3), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tunnicliffe, S., & Reiss, M. (2000). Building a model of the environment: How do children see plants? Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 172–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Turley, S. K. (1999). Conservation and tourism in the traditional UK zoo. The Journal of Tourism Studies, 10(2), 2–13.Google Scholar
  92. Turley, S. K. (2001). Children and demand for recreational experiences: The case of zoos. Leisure Studies, 20(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  93. Vosniadou, S. (1998). Cognitive psychology. Athens, Greece: Gutenberg Publications.Google Scholar
  94. Walker, S. (1991). Education and training in captive animal management. Proceedings in Perspectives in Zoo Management, National Zoological Park, New Delhi Zoo Ed Book, Zoo Outreach Organization.Google Scholar
  95. Ward, P. I., Mosberger, N., Kistler, C., & Fischer, O. (1998). The relationship between popularity and body size in zoo animals. Conservation Biology, 12, 1408–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Westervelt, M., & Lewellyn, L. (1985). The beliefs and behaviors of fifth and sixth grade students regarding non-domestic animals. Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
  97. Wilkinson, B. (1997). Multimedia wildlife education and attitudes. Unpublished master’s thesis, California State University, Northridge, CA.Google Scholar
  98. Wineman, J., Piper, C., & Maple, T. (1996). Zoos in transition: Enriching conservation education for a new generation. Curator: The Museum Journal, 39(2), 94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Young, I. (2008). Mental models: Aligning design strategy with human behavior. Brooklyn, NY: Rosenfeld Media.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia G. Patrick
    • 1
  • Sue Dale Tunnicliffe
    • 2
  1. 1.Texas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  2. 2.Institute of EducationUniversity of LondonLondonEngland UK

Personalised recommendations