An Integrated-ICT Assessment for College Students’ Performances of Chemical Learning

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on junior college students’ academic achievement and learning attitudes after exposure to an ICT-integrated experimental chemistry course. This study adopted the quasi-experimental approach and divided students into two groups. Aided by ANCOVA data, this study probed students’ chemical learning effects and attitudes in detail. Major results indicate what assessments of students’ ICT-integrated learning can be achieved and upgraded at the initial level by a NSC-funded project. Presentations of students’ ICT performances can be analyzed and implemented at the module level.

Keywords

Experimental Teaching Teaching Strategy Covariance Analysis Traditional Teaching Posttest Score 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

The author would like to thanks editors of this book and the anonymous reviewers of this paper for their kind assistance and helpful suggestions. A short but sincere thank you must also be given for the patronage of the National Science Council, R.O.C in Taiwan (under grant No. NSC 95-2511-S-237-001 and NSC 98-2511-S-237-001). Without their help, our study could not have been completed. Finally, thanks must also be given to all the teachers and students who participated in this research study.

References

  1. Ardac, D., & Akaygun, S. (2004). Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students’ understanding of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 317–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ardac, D., & Sezen, A. H. (2002). Effectiveness of computer-based chemistry instruction in enhancing the learning of content and variable control under guided versus unguided conditions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  4. Calik, M., & Ayas, A. (2005). A comparison of level of understanding of grade B students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 638–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coll, R., & Treagust, D. (2001). Learners’ use of analogy and alternative conceptions for chemical bonding: A cross-age study. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 48(1), 24–32.Google Scholar
  6. Frailich, M., Kesner, M., & Hofstein, A. (2007). The influence of web based chemistry learning on students’ perceptions, attitudes, and achievement. Research in Science and Technological Education, 25(2), 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Katerina, S., & Tzougraki, C. (2004). Attitudes toward chemistry among 11th grade students in high schools in Greece. Science Education, 88, 535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Wachira, P. (2008). Computer technology integration and student learning: Barriers and promise. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 560–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lin, H. S. (1998). The effectiveness of teaching chemistry through the history of science. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(10), 1326–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lin, H. S., Hung, J. Y., & Hung, S. C. (2002). Using the history of science to promote students’ problem-solving ability. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 453–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moreno, R., & Valdez, A. (2005). Cognitive load and learning effects of having students organize pictures and words in multimedia environments: The role of student interactivity and feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nakhleh, M. B. (1993). Are our students’ conceptual thinkers or algorithmic problem solvers? Journal of Chemical Education, 70(1), 52–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rodriguez, M. A., & Niaz, M. (2002). How in spite of the rhetoric, history of chemistry has been ignored in presenting atomic structure in textbooks. Science & Education, 11, 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Su, K. D. (2008a). An integrated science course designed with information communication technologies to enhance university students’ learning performance. Computers & Education, 51, 1365–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Su, K. D. (2008b). The effects of a chemistry course with integrated information communication technologies on university students’ learning and attitudes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Su, K. D. (2011). An intensive ICT-integrated environmental learning strategy for enhancing ­student performance. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6(1), 39–58.Google Scholar
  18. Trumper, R. (1997). Applying conceptual conflict strategies in the learning of the energy concept. Research in Science and Technology Education, 5, 1–19.Google Scholar
  19. Yang, E. M., & Andre, T. (2003). Spatial ability and the impact of visualization/animation on learning electrochemistry. International Journal Science Education, 25, 329–349.Google Scholar
  20. Yore, L. D. (2001). What is meant by constructivist science teaching and will the science education community stay the course for meaningful reform? Electronic Journal of Science Education, 5(4). Online journal: http://unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse
  21. Yore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and ­science literacy empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electro-optical Engineering and Center for General EducationDe Lin Institute of TechnologyNew Taipei CityChina

Personalised recommendations