Abstract
Many students face difficulties in learning electrochemistry. According to Davis (Educ Chem 28(5): 135–137, 1991), it is a difficult topic for most students and they have many misconceptions on the topic (Sanger & Greenbowe, J Res Sci Teach 34(4): 377–398, 1997). Therefore, chemistry teachers need to have an effective technique to teach electrochemistry concepts. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) as a strategy to teach electrochemistry, especially as related to cell potential. This study adapted the quasi-experimental design and nonequivalent groups were used. Sixty-five students from pre-university were involved and divided into two groups: control and experimental groups consisting of 33 and 32 students, respectively. Students in the experimental group were trained on the PBL technique for several weeks, while students in the control group had their class as usual. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, percentage and inferential statistics, and independent t-test. Findings showed that the use of PBL positively affected the academic performance of the topic of cell potential in the treatment group compared with the control group. Therefore, it is suggested that PBL be used as an effective technique to teach difficult chemistry concepts.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abdul Manaf, E., & Subramaniam, R. (2004, June 22–24). Use of chemistry demonstrations to foster conceptial understanding and cooperative learning among students. Paper presented at the Conference of the International Association for the Study of Cooperation in Education. Singapore.
Akçay, B. (2009). Problem-based learning in science education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(1), 26–36.
Akınoğlu, O., & Tandoğan, R. O. (2007). The effects of problem-based active learning in science education on students’ academic achievement, attitude and concept learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 71–81.
Alessio, H. (2004). Student perceptions about and performance in problem-based learning. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 25–36.
Awang, H., & Ramly, I. (2008). Creative thinking skill approach through problem-based learning: Pedagogy and practice in the engineering classroom. International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 18–23.
Bailey, P. D., & Garratt, J. (2002). Chemical education: Theory and practice. University Chemistry Education, 6(2), 39–57.
Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481–486.
Barrows, H., & Tamblyn, R. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.
Beacham, C. V., & Shambaugh, N. (2007). Advocacy as a problem-based learning (PBL) teaching strategy. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 315–324.
Blumberg, P. (2000). Evaluating the evidence that problem-based learners are self-directed learners: A review of the literature. In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 199–314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ERIC Digest. 1-5. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED340272).
Campbell, T. D., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing.
Davis, A. J. (1991). A model approach to teaching Redox. Education in Chemistry, 28(5), 135–137.
Dewey, J. (1916). Education and democracy. New York: Free Press [In Smith, T. (2008) Self-directed learning. EBSCO Research Starters. 1–8].
Gallow, D. (n.d). What is problem based learning. Problem Based learning Faculty. Retrieved from http://www.pbl.uci.edu
Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18–34.
Gürses, A., Açıkyıldız, M., Doğar, Ç., & Sözbilir, M. (2007). An investigation into the effectiveness of problem-based learning in a physical chemistry laboratory course. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(1), 99–113.
Hmelo, C. E., & Evensen, D. H. (2000). Introduction. Problem-based learning: Gaining insights on learning interactions through multiple methods of inquiry. In D. H. Evenson & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 1–16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
Kenney, B. F. (2008). Revitalizing the one-shot instruction session using problem-based learning. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 47(4), 386–391.
Lambros, A. (2002). Problem-based learning in K-8 classrooms: A teacher’s guide to implementation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Laquesta, R., Palacious, G., & Fernandez, L. (2009, October 18–21). Active learning through problem based learning methodology in engineering education. 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontier in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX.
Maizam, A., Saleh, M., & Hadi, H. (2007). The effect of the blended problem-based learning method on the acquisition of content-specific knowledge in mechanical engineering. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 6(2), 249–252.
Matriculation Division Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2006). Chemistry: SK017 & SK027 syllabus specification. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Ministry of Education Malaysia.
McKinney, K. (2010). Active learning. Normal, IL: Centre for Teaching, Learning & Technology. International Technology & Development Center, Illinois State.
Merrill, M. D. (2002). A pebble-in-the-pond model for instructional design. Performance Improvement, 41(7), 39–44.
Mohamed, N. H., & Abdul Kadir, R. (2005). Problem-based learning: An interdisciplinary approach in clinical teaching. Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 1–6.
Mok, M. M. C., Cheng, Y. C., Leung, S. O., Shan, P. W. J., Moore, P., & Kennedy, K. (2007). Self-directed learning as a key approach to effectiveness of education: A comparison among mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 839–858). Dordrecht: Springer.
Nendaz, M. R., & Tekian, A. (1999). Assessment in problem-based learning medical schools: A literature review. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 11(4), 232–243. doi:10.1207/s15328015tlm110408.
Office of Instructional Consulting, School of Education, Indiana University Bloomington. (2000). Active learning techniques. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/∼icy/document/active_learning_techniques.pdf.
Oosterhof, A. (2001). Classroom applications of educational measurement (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merill Prentice Hall.
Sanger, M. J., & Greenbowe, T. J. (1997). Common student misconception in electrochemistry: Galvanic, electrolytic and concentration cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 377–398.
Silverman, M. P. (1996). Self-directed learning: Philosophy and implementation. Science & Education, 5, 357–380.
Sungur, S., Tekkaya, C., & Geban, O. (2006). Improving achievement through problem-based learning. Journal of Biological Education, 40(4), 155–160.
Tan, I. (2008, November). Learning chemistry through authentic problem-based learning (PBL) approach. APERA Conference on Educational Research for Innovation & Quality in Education: Policy & Pedagogical Engagements Across Contex, Singapore.
Tan, S. C. (2000). The effects of incorporating concept mapping into computer- assisted instruction. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 23(2), 113–131.
Tarhan, L., & Acar, B. (2007). Problem-based learning in an eleventh grade chemistry class: ‘Factors affecting cell potential’. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(3), 351–369.
Thompson, J., & Soyibo, K. (2002). Effects of lecture, teacher demonstrations, discussion and practical work on 10th graders’ attitudes to chemistry and understanding of electrolysis. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(1), 25–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Teh, KL., Yakob, N. (2013). Problem-Based Learning as an Approach to Teach Cell Potential in Matriculation College, Malaysia. In: Chiu, MH., Tuan, HL., Wu, HK., Lin, JW., Chou, CC. (eds) Chemistry Education and Sustainability in the Global Age. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4860-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4860-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4859-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4860-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)