Advertisement

Problem-Based Learning as an Approach to Teach Cell Potential in Matriculation College, Malaysia

  • Kai-Li Teh
  • Nooraida Yakob
Chapter

Abstract

Many students face difficulties in learning electrochemistry. According to Davis (Educ Chem 28(5): 135–137, 1991), it is a difficult topic for most students and they have many misconceptions on the topic (Sanger & Greenbowe, J Res Sci Teach 34(4): 377–398, 1997). Therefore, chemistry teachers need to have an effective technique to teach electrochemistry concepts. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of problem-based learning (PBL) as a strategy to teach electrochemistry, especially as related to cell potential. This study adapted the quasi-experimental design and nonequivalent groups were used. Sixty-five students from pre-university were involved and divided into two groups: control and experimental groups consisting of 33 and 32 students, respectively. Students in the experimental group were trained on the PBL technique for several weeks, while students in the control group had their class as usual. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, percentage and inferential statistics, and independent t-test. Findings showed that the use of PBL positively affected the academic performance of the topic of cell potential in the treatment group compared with the control group. Therefore, it is suggested that PBL be used as an effective technique to teach difficult chemistry concepts.

Keywords

Achievement Test Cell Potential Achievement Test Score Chemistry Curriculum Matriculation Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abdul Manaf, E., & Subramaniam, R. (2004, June 22–24). Use of chemistry demonstrations to foster conceptial understanding and cooperative learning among students. Paper presented at the Conference of the International Association for the Study of Cooperation in Education. Singapore.Google Scholar
  2. Akçay, B. (2009). Problem-based learning in science education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(1), 26–36.Google Scholar
  3. Akınoğlu, O., & Tandoğan, R. O. (2007). The effects of problem-based active learning in science education on students’ academic achievement, attitude and concept learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(1), 71–81.Google Scholar
  4. Alessio, H. (2004). Student perceptions about and performance in problem-based learning. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(1), 25–36.Google Scholar
  5. Awang, H., & Ramly, I. (2008). Creative thinking skill approach through problem-based learning: Pedagogy and practice in the engineering classroom. International Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 18–23.Google Scholar
  6. Bailey, P. D., & Garratt, J. (2002). Chemical education: Theory and practice. University Chemistry Education, 6(2), 39–57.Google Scholar
  7. Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrows, H., & Tamblyn, R. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Beacham, C. V., & Shambaugh, N. (2007). Advocacy as a problem-based learning (PBL) teaching strategy. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 315–324.Google Scholar
  10. Blumberg, P. (2000). Evaluating the evidence that problem-based learners are self-directed learners: A review of the literature. In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 199–314). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ERIC Digest. 1-5. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED340272).Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, T. D., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, A. J. (1991). A model approach to teaching Redox. Education in Chemistry, 28(5), 135–137.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1916). Education and democracy. New York: Free Press [In Smith, T. (2008) Self-directed learning. EBSCO Research Starters. 1–8].Google Scholar
  15. Gallow, D. (n.d). What is problem based learning. Problem Based learning Faculty. Retrieved from http://www.pbl.uci.edu
  16. Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gürses, A., Açıkyıldız, M., Doğar, Ç., & Sözbilir, M. (2007). An investigation into the effectiveness of problem-based learning in a physical chemistry laboratory course. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(1), 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hmelo, C. E., & Evensen, D. H. (2000). Introduction. Problem-based learning: Gaining insights on learning interactions through multiple methods of inquiry. In D. H. Evenson & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 1–16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kenney, B. F. (2008). Revitalizing the one-shot instruction session using problem-based learning. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 47(4), 386–391.Google Scholar
  21. Lambros, A. (2002). Problem-based learning in K-8 classrooms: A teacher’s guide to implementation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  22. Laquesta, R., Palacious, G., & Fernandez, L. (2009, October 18–21). Active learning through problem based learning methodology in engineering education. 39th ASEE/IEEE Frontier in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  23. Maizam, A., Saleh, M., & Hadi, H. (2007). The effect of the blended problem-based learning method on the acquisition of content-specific knowledge in mechanical engineering. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 6(2), 249–252.Google Scholar
  24. Matriculation Division Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2006). Chemistry: SK017 & SK027 syllabus specification. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Ministry of Education Malaysia.Google Scholar
  25. McKinney, K. (2010). Active learning. Normal, IL: Centre for Teaching, Learning & Technology. International Technology & Development Center, Illinois State.Google Scholar
  26. Merrill, M. D. (2002). A pebble-in-the-pond model for instructional design. Performance Improvement, 41(7), 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mohamed, N. H., & Abdul Kadir, R. (2005). Problem-based learning: An interdisciplinary approach in clinical teaching. Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  28. Mok, M. M. C., Cheng, Y. C., Leung, S. O., Shan, P. W. J., Moore, P., & Kennedy, K. (2007). Self-directed learning as a key approach to effectiveness of education: A comparison among mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 839–858). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nendaz, M. R., & Tekian, A. (1999). Assessment in problem-based learning medical schools: A literature review. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 11(4), 232–243. doi:10.1207/s15328015tlm110408. Google Scholar
  30. Office of Instructional Consulting, School of Education, Indiana University Bloomington. (2000). Active learning techniques. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/∼icy/document/active_learning_techniques.pdf.
  31. Oosterhof, A. (2001). Classroom applications of educational measurement (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Sanger, M. J., & Greenbowe, T. J. (1997). Common student misconception in electrochemistry: Galvanic, electrolytic and concentration cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Silverman, M. P. (1996). Self-directed learning: Philosophy and implementation. Science & Education, 5, 357–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sungur, S., Tekkaya, C., & Geban, O. (2006). Improving achievement through problem-based learning. Journal of Biological Education, 40(4), 155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tan, I. (2008, November). Learning chemistry through authentic problem-based learning (PBL) approach. APERA Conference on Educational Research for Innovation & Quality in Education: Policy & Pedagogical Engagements Across Contex, Singapore.Google Scholar
  36. Tan, S. C. (2000). The effects of incorporating concept mapping into computer- assisted instruction. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 23(2), 113–131.Google Scholar
  37. Tarhan, L., & Acar, B. (2007). Problem-based learning in an eleventh grade chemistry class: ‘Factors affecting cell potential’. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(3), 351–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thompson, J., & Soyibo, K. (2002). Effects of lecture, teacher demonstrations, discussion and practical work on 10th graders’ attitudes to chemistry and understanding of electrolysis. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(1), 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Educational StudiesUniversiti Sains MalaysiaGeorge TownMalaysia

Personalised recommendations