Skip to main content

Introduction: Paradoxes of Integration

Part of the International Perspectives on Migration book series (IPMI,volume 4)

Abstract

This book explores different facets of migrant women’s participation in the EU. It analyses the lives of new female migrants with a focus on the labour market, and domestic, care work and prostitution in particular, both in terms of regular and irregular status and using a biographical perspective. It draws on research in the frame of the FeMiPol project, conducted between 2006 and 2008 within the 6th Framework Programme of the European Commission. This book provides a comparative analysis embracing 11 European countries from Northern (the UK, Germany, Sweden, France), Southern (Portugal, Spain, Italy, Greece, Cyprus) and Eastern Europe (Poland, Slovenia), that is, old and new immigration countries as well as old and new market economies. This book considers the interplay of migration and policies and women’s strategies in relation to these.

Keywords

  • Labour Market
  • Asylum Seeker
  • Migrant Woman
  • Civic Participation
  • Undocumented Migrant

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-4842-2_1
  • Chapter length: 16 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-94-007-4842-2
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Notes

  1. 1.

    Under ‘new migration’, we mean the migratory movements in the last decade of the twentieth century and the beginning of the twenty-first.

  2. 2.

    ‘Integration of Female Immigrants in Labour Market and Society. Policy Assessment and Policy Recommendations’; see www.femipol.uni-frankfurt.de.

  3. 3.

    The UK, Ireland and Denmark have opted out of the directive.

  4. 4.

    The capabilities approach for reframing integration has been adopted by the European Network Against Racism (2011). See also Briones (2009).

  5. 5.

    The book draws on the empirical data collected within the FeMiPol project: biographical narrative interviews with 196 migrant women who entered European countries in the last two decades and 66 expert interviews with policy makers, social service officers and NGO activists.

References

  • Acosta, D. (2011). The long-term residence status as a subsidiary form of EU citizenship. An analysis of directive 2003/109. Leiden/Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Amelina, A., & Faist, T. (2008). Turkish Migrant Associations in Germany: Between integration pressure and transnational linkages. Revue Européenne des Migrations Internationales, 24(2), 91–120.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anthias, F. (1998). Rethinking social divisions: Some notes towards a theoretical framework. The Sociological Review, 46(3), 506–535.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anthias, F. (2001a). The concept of ‘social division’ and theorising social stratification: Looking at ethnicity and class. Sociology, 35(4), 835–854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthias, F. (2001b). New hybridities old concepts: The limits of culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), 619–642.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Anthias, F. (2012 forthcoming). The Janus face of integration and diversity discourses: Towards an intersectional framing. Sociological Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthias, F., & Lazaridis, G. (2000). Introduction: Into the margins-migration and exclusion in Southern Europe. In F. Anthias, & G. Lazaridis (Eds.), Gender and migration in Southern Europe: Women on the move, (pp. 1–11). Oxford: Berg, pp. 263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthias, F., & Yuval Davis, N. (1983). ‘Contextualising feminism – Ethnic. Gender and Class Divisions’ Feminist Review, 15, 62–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthias, F., & Yuval Davis, N. (1992). Racialised boundaries – Race, nation, gender, colour and class and the anti-racist struggle. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthias, F., Cederberg, M., Barber, T., & Ron Ayres, R. (2008). The biographical narrative interviews with female migrants: The UK Case Report WP 6, FeMiPol Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apitzsch, U. (2002). Biographien in Europa. Neue Dimensionen des Sozialen. In F. Hamburger, A. Eggert, A. Heinen, H. Luckas, M. May, & H. Müller (Eds.), Gestaltung des Sozialen – neue Herausforderungen in Europa (pp. 199–223). Opladen: Leske  +  Budrich.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Briones, L. (2009). Empowering migrant women. Why agency and rights are not enough. Surrey/Burlington, USA: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choo, H. Y., & Ferree, M. M. (2010 June). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28(2), 129–149.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J. (1994). Diasporas. Cultural Anthropology, 9(3), 302–338.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. P. (1993). Toward a new vision: Race, class and gender as categories of analysis and connection. Race, Sex and Class, 1(1), 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. (2005). A common agenda for integration framework for the integration of third-country nationals in the European Union. Brussels, COM(2005) 389 final, 1.9.2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, M. (2009). Barrier or entitlement – the language and citizenship agenda in the UK. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(1), 71–77.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1994). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics and violence against women of color. In M. A. Fineman & R. Mykitiuk (Eds.), The public nature of private violence (pp. 93–118). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, J.-C., Martin, J.-P., & Spielvogel, G. (2007), Women on the move: The neglected gender dimension of the brain drain (IZA DP No. 2920). Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, É. (1893/1984). The division of labour in society (translated from the French edition of 1893 by W. D. Halls with an introduction by Lewis Coser). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erel, U. (2010). Migrating cultural capital: Bourdieu in migration studies. Sociology, 44(4), 642–660.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Erel, U., Morokvasic, M., & Shinozaki, K. (2003). Introduction. Bringing gender into migration. In M. Morokvasic, U. Erel, & K. Shinozaki (Eds.), Crossing borders and shifting boundaries. Gender on the move (pp. 9–22). Opladen: Leske  +  Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faist, T. (2000). The volume and dynamics of international migration and transnational spaces. Oxford: Clarendon.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Finotelli, C. (2008). Migration policy between restrictive purposes and structural demand: The case of the domestic sector in Germany and in Italy. In S. Metz-Göckel, M. Morokvasic, & A. MünstSenganata (Eds.), Migration and mobility in an enlarged Europe. A gender perspective (pp. 52–78). Leverkusen/Opladen: Barbara Budrich Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, S. (2011). Rassismus in der Leistungsgesellschaft. In Friedrich, S. (Ed.) Rassismus in der Leistungsgesellschaft. Analysen und kritische Perspektiven zu den rassistischen Normalisierungsprozessen der “Sarrazindebatte” (pp. 8–39). Münster: Edition Assemblage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabaccia, D. (1994). From the other side women, gender and immigrant life in the US 1829.1990. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick-Schiller, N., Basch, L., & Szanton-Blanc, C. (1992). Towards a transnational perspectives on migration. New York: News York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S. W. (2010). Integration requirements for integration’s sake? Identifying, categorising and comparing civic integration policies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(5), 753–772.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, K. (2004). Legal concepts of integration in EU migration law. European Journal of Migration and Law., 6(2), 111–126.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Guénif-Suilamas, N. (2003), Fortune et infortune d’un mot: l :integration. Jalons d’une discussion entre sociologues et politiques. Ville-Ecole-Intégration Enjeux, n°135 mdécembre 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiraudon, V. (2008). Integration contracts for immigrants: Common trends and differences in the European experience (ARI). ARI 43/2008 – 7/5/2008. http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/portal/rielcano_eng/Print?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/wps/wcm/connect/elcano/Elcano_in/Zonas_in/ARI43-2008. Accessed 24 Oct 2011.

  • Home Office. (2008). The path to citizenship: Next steps in reforming the immigration system. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C. (2007). Beyond national models: Civic integration policies for immigrants in Western Europe. West European Politics, 30, 1–22.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C. (2010). Citizenship and immigration. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, B., & Baglioni, S. (2008). Le transnationalisme en action: le cas des Turcs en Suisse. Revue européenne des migrations internationales, 24(2), 167–191.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kofman, E., Phizacklea, A., Raghuram, P., & Sales, R. (2000). Gender and international migration in Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontos, M. (2008). Der Mythos der Integrationsunwilligkeit von Migrantinnen: Ungereimheiten der aktuellen Integrationspolitik. In Hessisches Sozialministerium (Ed.), Potenziale von Migrantinnen. Rolle der Frauen im Integrationsprozess (pp. 32–43). Wiesbaden: HLZPB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontos, M. & Sacaliuc, A.-V. (2008). New Female Migrants: Biographical Processes, Integration Strategies and Social Policies: The German Case. Report WP 6, FeMiPol Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontos, M. (2011). The labour market integration of third country migrants in Germany and the impact of recent policies: Integration policy as policy of exclusion. In M. Pajnik & G. Campani (Eds.), Precarious migrant labour across Europe (pp. 15–44). Ljubljana: Peace Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontos, M. (2013 forthcoming). Restrictive integration policies and the construction of migrants as “unwilling to integrate”: The case of Germany. In F. Anthias & M. Pajnik (Eds.), Engendering mig­ration, contesting integration: Theory and practice. Houndsmills/Hampshire/New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostakopoulou, D. (2010). Matters of control: Integration tests, naturalisation reform and probationary citizenship in the United Kingdom. Journal of Ethic and Migration Studies, 36(5), 829–846. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title∼db=all∼content=t713433350∼tab=issueslist∼branches=36

  • McGhee, D. (2008). ‘A past built on difference, a future which is shared’ – A critical examination of the recommendations made by the Commission on Integration and Community Cohesion. People, Place & Policy Online, 2(2), 48–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. (1982). Ungerechtigkeit. Die sozialen Ursachen von Unterordnung und Widerstand. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morokvasic, M. (2003). Transnational mobility and gender: A view from post-wall Europe. In M. Morokvasic, U. Erel, & K. Shinozaki (Eds.), Crossing borders and shifting boundaries gender on the move (pp. 101–133). Opladen: Leske  +  Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morokvasic, M. (2004). Settled in mobility: Engendering post-wall migration in Europe. Feminist Review, 77(1), 7–25.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Morokvasic, M. (2007). Migration, gender, empowerment. In I. Lenz, C. Ullrich, & B. Fersch (Eds.), Gender orders unbound. Globalisation, restructuring and reciprocity (pp. 69–97). Opladen/Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morokvasic, M. (2011). L’(in)visibilité continue. Cahiers du genre, 51, 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morokvasic, M., & Catarino, C. (2006). Mapping of policies affecting female migrants and policy analysis: The French case. Report WP1, FeMiPol Project. http://www.femipol.uni-frankfurt.de/docs/working_papers/wp1/France.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2011.

  • Morokvasic, M., & Catarino, C. (2007). Une (in)visibilité multiforme. Plein Droit, n° 75, Décembre 2007, pp. 27–30. http://www.gisti.org/spip.php?rubrique56

  • Morokvasic, M., & Rudolph, H. (1994). Wanderungsraum Europa. Menschen und Grenzen in Bewegung. Berlin: Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulinari, D., & Neergaard, A. (2005 January). ‘Black skull’ consciousness: The new Swedish working class. Race and Class, 46(3), 55–72.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P. (2008). Faith in the State? Asian women’s struggles for human rights in the U.K. Feminist Legal Studies, 16(1), 9–36.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Penninx, R. (2004, January 12–14). Integration of migrants. Economic, social, cultural and political dimensions. Background paper for the European Population Forum 2004 ‘ Population Challenges and Policy Responses’, Geneva. http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/pau/_docs/pau/2004/PAU_2004_EPF_BgDocPenninx.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept 2011.

  • Peraldi, M., Betaieb, A., & Manry, V. (2001). L‘esprit de bazar Mobilités transnationales maghrebines et sociétés métropolitaines. Les routes d‘Istanboul. In M. Perladi (Ed.), Cabas et contenaires. Activités marchandes informelles et réseaux migrants transfrontaliers (pp. 329–361). Paris: Maisonneuve & Larose.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A. (2001). Introduction: The debates and significance of immigrant transnationalism. Global Networks, 1(3), 181–193.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pries, L. (1997). Neue Migration in im transnationalen Raum. In L. Pries (Ed.), Transnationale migration . Soziale Welt (pp. 15–44). Sonderband 12. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pukayastha, B. (2010). Interrogating intersectionality: Contemporary globalisation and racialised gendering in the lives of highly educated South Asian American and their children. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 31(2), 9–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauer, V. (2008). Die öffentliche Dimension der Integration. Migrationspolitische Diskurse türkischer Dachverbände in Deutschland. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütze, F. (1983). Biographieforschung und narratives interview. Neue Praxis, 44(3), 283–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütze, F. (1984). Kognitive Figuren des autobiographischen Stegreiferzählens. In M. Kohli & G. Robert (Eds.), Biographie und soziale Wirklichkeit (pp. 78–117). Stuttgart: Klett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1995). Capability and well-being. In M. C. Nussbaum & A. K. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1950). The stranger. In H. K. Wolff (Ed.), The sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 409–427). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, G. (1995). Géodynamique des migrations internationales. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snel, E., Engbersen, G., & Leerkes, A. (2006). Transnational involvement and social integration. Global Networks, 6(3), 285–308.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrius, A. (1992). Les fourmis d’Europe. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. W. (1918–1922). The polish peasant in Europe and America. Monograph of an Immigrant Group (5 vols). Boston: Richard G. Badger, The Gorham Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triadafilopoulos, T. (2011). Illiberal means to liberal ends? Understanding recent immigrant integration policies in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(6), 861–880.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, K., & Yeoh, B. (Eds.). (2000). Gender and migration. Cheltenham/Northhampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N., Anthias, F., & Kofman, E. (2005). Secure borders and safe haven and the gendered politics of belonging: Beyond social cohesion. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28(3), 513–535.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zetter, R., Griffiths, D., Sigona, N., Flynn, D., Pasha, T., & Beynon, R. (2006). Immigration, social cohesion and social capital: What are the links? New York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zylberstein, J. -C. (1993), L’intégration à la française. Paris: Union Générale d’Editions 10/18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Floya Anthias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anthias, F., Morokvasic-Müller, M., Kontos, M. (2013). Introduction: Paradoxes of Integration. In: Anthias, F., Kontos, M., Morokvasic-Müller, M. (eds) Paradoxes of Integration: Female Migrants in Europe. International Perspectives on Migration, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4842-2_1

Download citation