Professional Attitudes to the Use of Data in England

  • Christopher Downey
  • Anthony Kelly
Part of the Studies in Educational Leadership book series (SIEL, volume 17)


English schools arguably have more sophisticated datasets at their disposal than any other jurisdiction in the world. These datasets gather the academic outcomes and a range of demographic data for all young people in England from age 4 to 16. They are used to provide schools with a wide range of school- and student-level measures related to academic attainment and value-added progress to inform school self-evaluation. This chapter discusses some of the ways these data are utilised in English secondary schools in order to inform school improvement. It presents findings from a nationwide survey of teachers on their self-reported use of, and attitudes toward, student- and school-level attainment and progress data. The purpose of the survey was to investigate the extent to which teachers in schools use these data; whether they are satisfied with their level of understanding of data; and the frequency of training they feel they require to both interpret and utilise it. The survey found that levels of data use in English secondary schools are high and that satisfaction with data use is linked to teachers’ level of responsibility, with Deputy and Assistant School Principals reporting the most extensive data use and greatest satisfaction with their level of data use. The frequency of training in data use appears to be positively linked to teachers’ self-reported level of understanding of data. The results suggest that teachers with no formal leadership roles require training on at least annual basis to significantly improve their understanding of data. Teachers strongly feel that data analysis and interpretation should be delegated to a greater extent throughout the staff in the school. There is also a perception that Heads of Department should take the leading role in data analysis and interpretation, more so than is the case in many schools where analysis and interpretation of data is often the province of more senior members of the school leadership team.


School Performance Classroom Teacher Continue Professional Development School Improvement Head Teacher 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Balls, E. (2008). Gaining Ground—Improving progress in coasting secondary schools, letter to all Local Authority Directors Children’s Services (online) Accessed 12 Feb 2009.Google Scholar
  2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.Google Scholar
  3. Bush, A., Edwards, L., Hopwood Road, F., & Lewis, M. (2005) Why here? Report of qualitative work with teachers working in schools above and below the floor targets: DfES research report RR666. Nottingham: DfES.Google Scholar
  4. Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gui, Q., Penlington, C., Mehta, P., & Kington, A. (2008). The Impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes: DCSF research report RR018. Nottingham: DfES.Google Scholar
  5. DfE (2010). School and College Performance Tables (online) Accessed 30April 2011.Google Scholar
  6. Downey, C., & Kelly, A. (2008). Utilising value-added progress data in the context of Every Child Matters, paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement (ICSEI). Auckland, New Zealand, 9 January 2008.Google Scholar
  7. Dudley, P. (1997). How teachers respond to pupil data, paper presented at the BERA Annual Conference (York, 10–14 September).Google Scholar
  8. Dudley, P. (1999a). Primary schools and pupil data. In G. Southworth & P. Lincoln (Eds.), Supporting improving primary schools: The role of heads and LEAs in raising standards. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  9. Dudley, P. (1999b). Using data to drive up standards: statistics or psychology? In C. Conner (Ed.), Assessment in action in the primary school. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  10. Earl, L., & Fullan, M. (2003). Using data in leadership for learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2006). Leading schools in a data rich world. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.Google Scholar
  12. Katz, S., & Earl, L (2010). Learning about networked learning communities. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(1), 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kelly, A., & Downey, C (2007). Are value-added scores getting the measure of school performance in the UK?, paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement (ICSEI) (Potorož, Slovenia, 6 January).Google Scholar
  14. Kelly, A., & Downey, C. (2011). Using effectiveness data for school improvement: Developing and utilising metrics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Kirkup, C., Sizmur, J., Sturman, L. & Lewis, K. (2005). Schools’ use of data in teaching and learning: DfES research report RR671. Nottingham: DfES.Google Scholar
  16. Lipsett, A. (2008). Balls to tackle ‘coasting’ schools, The Guradian newspaper (online) accessed November 2008. Accessed 20 April 2009.Google Scholar
  17. Miliband, D. (2003). The annual leadership lecture 2003. Nottingham: National College of School Leadership.Google Scholar
  18. Miliband D. (2004). Personalised learning: Building a new relationship with schools, paper delivered at the North of England Education Conference Belfast, January.Google Scholar
  19. PricewaterhouseCoopers (2008). High performing specialist schools: Interim evaluation, DCSF research report RW034. Nottingham: DCSF.Google Scholar
  20. Saunders, L., & Rudd, P. (1999). Schools’ use of ‘value added’ data: a science in the service of an art?, paper delivered at the British Educational Research Association Conference (BERA) Brighton, September.Google Scholar
  21. Schildkamp, K., & Teddlie, C. (2008). School performance feedback systems in the USA and in The Netherlands: A comparison. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(3), 255–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schildkamp, K., Visscher, A., & Luyten, H. (2009). The effects of the use of a school self-evaluation instrument. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(1), 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schildkamp, K., & Kuiper, W. (2010). Data-informed curriculum reform: Which data, what purposes, and promoting and hindering factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 482–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stevens, J., Brown, J., Knibbs, S., & Smith, J. (2005). Follow-up research into the state of school leadership in England: DfES research report RR633. Nottingham: DfES.Google Scholar
  25. TDA (2007a). Professional standards for teachers—Qualified teacher status. London: Training and Development Agency for Schools.Google Scholar
  26. TDA (2007b). Professional standards for teachers—Core. London: Training and Development Agency for Schools.Google Scholar
  27. TDA (2007c). Professional standards for teachers—Post threshold. London: Training and Development Agency for Schools.Google Scholar
  28. TDA (2007d). Professional standards for teachers—Excellent teachers. London: Training and Development Agency for Schools.Google Scholar
  29. Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2007). Matching internal and external evaluation in an era of accountability and school development: Lessons from a Flemish perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(2), 101–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vanhoof, J., Verhaeghe, G., Verheaghe, J. P., Valcke, M., & Van Petegem, P. (2010). The influence of competences and support on school performance feedback use. Educational Studies, 37(2), 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wayman, J. C. (2005). Involving teachers in data-based decision-making: Using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 10(3), 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wayman, J. C., Midgley, S., & Stringfield, S. (2006). Leadership for data-based decision-making: Collaborative data teams. In A. Danzig, K. Borman, B. Jones & B. Wright (Eds.), New models of professional development for learner centered leadership. Mawah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Wohlstetter, P., Datnow, A., & Park, V. (2008). Creating a system for data-driven decision-making: Applying the principal-agent framework. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(3), 239–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southampton Education SchoolUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK,

Personalised recommendations