Data Use: Where to from Here?

  • Lorna Earl
  • Karen Seashore Louis
Part of the Studies in Educational Leadership book series (SIEL, volume 17)


In the final chapter of the book, Lorna Earl and Karen Seashore Louis reflect on the question where to from here? They situate data use in a policy and politics context. Working with data does not happen outside political and cultural context of particular societies and schools. Also, they discuss the different views on educational change and accountability, the consequences of policies made at different levels on data use, and how autonomy affects data use. Finally, they argue that with regard to data-based decision making, the emphasis should not be on the data, but on the quality of knowledge that emerges from this process. Good knowledge is founded by asking good questions, having good data, and engaging in good thinking.


High Stake Educational Leader Good Question Good Thinking Local Education Authority 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Barbules, N., & Torres, C. (2000). Globalization and education: Critical perspectives. New York, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Darling Hammond, L. (1994). Performance-based assessment and educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 64, 23.Google Scholar
  3. Devos, G. (in press). Regulated anarchy in catholic and public education. In K. S. Louis & B. van Velzen (Eds.), Global education policy: Political culture and its effects. Palgrave MacMillan (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  4. EACEA. (2009). National testing of pupils in Europe: Objectives, organisation and use of results. Brussels: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.Google Scholar
  5. Earl, L., & Katz, S. (2006). Leading schools in a data-rich world: Harnessing data for school improvement. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.Google Scholar
  6. Hakkarainen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communites of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  7. Glazerman, S., Goldhaber, D., Goldhaber, D., Raudenbush, S., & Whitehurst, G. (2011). Passing muster: Evaluating teacher evaluation systems. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  8. Lin, Y., Wang, L., & Tserng, H. P. (2006). Enhancing knowledge exchange through web map-based knowledge management systems in construction: Lessons learned in Taiwan. Automation in Construction, 15, 693–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Louis, K. S., & MacBeath, J. (in press). The more things change, the more they stay the same: The English case. In K. S. Louis & B. van Velzen (Eds.), Global education policy: Political culture and its effects (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  10. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, H., Dobbs, R., Roxborough, C., & Byers, A. H. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition and productivity. McKinsey & Co.Google Scholar
  11. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. (1986). Garbage can models of decision making in organizations. In J. March & R. Weissinger-Baylon (Eds.), Ambiguity and command: Organizational perspectives on military decision making (pp. 11–52). Marshfield: McCutcheon.Google Scholar
  12. Marsh, J., & Robyn, A. (2006). School and district improvement efforts in response to the No Child Left Behind Act. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  13. Marsh, J., Pane, J., & Hamilton, L. (2006). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  14. Moteleb, A. A., & Woodman, M. (2007). Notions of knowledge management systems: A gap analysis. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 55–62.Google Scholar
  15. Newmann, F., King, B., & Rigdon, M. (1997). Accountability and school performance: Implications from restructuring schools. Harvard Education Review, 61(1), 47–75.Google Scholar
  16. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Century Business.Google Scholar
  17. Wagner, W. (1995). Accountability in education: A philosophical inquiry. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUnited States

Personalised recommendations