Skip to main content

An Uneasy Relationship: Atheism and Scepticism in the Late French Enlightenment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Scepticism in the Eighteenth Century: Enlightenment, Lumières, Aufklärung

Abstract

At first glance, the materialistic atheism of the late French Enlightenment appears philosophically dogmatic and wholly incompatible with philosophical scepticism. A closer examination of the works of Denis Diderot, the baron d’Holbach, and Jacques-André Naigeon, however, reveals that at their seemingly most dogmatic moments, they reflected significantly on “the weakness of the human mind” in ways that had important sceptical consequences. More importantly, when they examined the status of their own propositions, they concluded on behalf both of the impossibility of philosophical demonstration of their own foundational assumptions and of the impossibility of changing, in the ways they would have desired, the thinking and the behavior of the human species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Alan Charles Kors, “Atheism and Scepticism in the Late French Enlightenment,” in Marc André Bernier and Sébastien Charles (eds.), Scepticisme et modernité, Saint-Étienne, Presses de l’Université Saint-Étienne, 2005, pp. 145–52.

  2. 2.

    Denis Diderot, Œuvres philosophiques. Paul Vernière (ed.), Paris, 1964, pp. 280–4.

  3. 3.

    Ibid., p. 313.

  4. 4.

    Ibid., pp. 304–6.

  5. 5.

    Ibid., p. 59.

  6. 6.

    Ibid., p. 192.

  7. 7.

    Denis Diderot, Œuvres romanesques. Henri Bénac (ed.), Paris, 1962, p. 499.

  8. 8.

    Diderot, Œuvres philosophiques, p. 364.

  9. 9.

    Diderot, Œuvres romanesques, pp. 670–1.

  10. 10.

    Paul-Henri Thiry d’Holbach, “Essai sur les préjugés; Système de la nature; Histoire critique de Jésus-Christ,” in Jean-Pierre Jackson (ed.), Œuvres philosophiques complètes, Paris, 1999, t. II, p. 158.

  11. 11.

    Ibid., p. 159.

  12. 12.

    Ibid., Système de la nature, passim. The opening sentence of Holbach’s preface to the Système is “L’homme n’est malheureux que parce qu’il méconnaît la Nature.” Ibid., p. 165.

  13. 13.

    Ibid., pp. 168–9.

  14. 14.

    Ibid., p. 179.

  15. 15.

    Ibid., pp. 228–37.

  16. 16.

    Ibid., p. 249.

  17. 17.

    Ibid., p. 279 (and, indeed, passim).

  18. 18.

    Ibid., pp. 300–2.

  19. 19.

    Ibid., p. 594.

  20. 20.

    Ibid., p. 635.

  21. 21.

    Ibid., p. 586.

  22. 22.

    Ibid., pp. 624–5.

  23. 23.

    Ibid., p. 635.

  24. 24.

    Holbach, Le Bon-Sens, ou Idées naturelles opposées aux idées surnaturelles, Londres, [Amsterdam], 1771, p. 141.

  25. 25.

    See note 1.

  26. 26.

    On Naigeon himself, whose life is little know, see Alan Charles Kors, D’Holbach’s Coterie: An Enlightenment in Paris, Princeton, 1976, pp. 27–9, 44–86, 199–200, 256–7, 286–7, 289–90.

  27. 27.

    Jacques-André Naigeon, Mémoires historiques et philosophiques sur la vie et les ouvrages de D. Diderot, Paris, 1821, pp. 258–9.

  28. 28.

    Jacques-André Naigeon, Philosophie ancienne et moderne, Paris, 1791, 3 vols., I, 1–2.

  29. 29.

    Ibid., 2–4.

  30. 30.

    Ibid., 3–4.

  31. 31.

    Ibid., II, 724–738.

  32. 32.

    Ibid.

  33. 33.

    Ibid., 736, note 1. (See David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, L. A. Selby-Bigge and P. H. Nidditch (eds.), in Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 3rd ed., 1975, p. 155, note 31.)

  34. 34.

    Ibid., 737–8.

  35. 35.

    Ibid. 749–56.

  36. 36.

    Ibid., 368–70; see, in particular, note 1, pp. 368–9.

  37. 37.

    In Denis Diderot, Correspondance, Georges Roth et al. (eds.), Paris, 1955–1970, 12 vols., VI, pp. 169–72.

  38. 38.

    Naigeon, Mémoires sur Diderot, op. cit., 307–8.

  39. 39.

    Ibid.

Bibliography

  • Diderot, Denis. 1955–1970. Correspondance, 16 vols. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diderot, Denis. 1962. Œuvres romanesques. Paris: Garnier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diderot, Denis. 1964. Œuvres philosophiques. Paris: Garnier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbach, Paul-Henri Thiry d’. 1771. Le Bon-Sens, ou Idées naturelles opposées aux idées surnaturelles. Londres [Amsterdam]: Marc-Michel Rey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbach, Paul-Henri Thiry d’. 1998–2001. Œuvres philosophiques complètes, 3 vols. Paris: Alive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. 1755. Philosophische Versuche über die Menschliche Erkenntniß. Hamburg/Leipzig: Bey G.C. Grund und A.H. Holle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David. 1975. In An enquiry concerning human understanding, 3rd ed, ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge and P.H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kors, Alan C. 1976. D’Holbach’s coterie: An enlightenment in Paris. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kors, Alan C. 2005. In Scepticisme et modernité, ed. M.A. Bernier and S. Charles, 145–152. Saint-Étienne: Presses de l’Université Saint-Étienne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naigeon, Jacques-André. 1791. Philosophie ancienne et moderne, vol. 3. Paris: Panckoucke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naigeon, Jacques-André. 1821. Mémoires historiques et philosophiques sur a vie et les ouvrages de D. Diderot. Paris: J. L. J. Brière.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Charles Kors .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kors, A.C. (2013). An Uneasy Relationship: Atheism and Scepticism in the Late French Enlightenment. In: Charles, S., J. Smith, P. (eds) Scepticism in the Eighteenth Century: Enlightenment, Lumières, Aufklärung. International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées, vol 210. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4810-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics