Abstract

It seems that the links with the skepticism of Voltaire have not received much attention of researchers so far. Speaking of the skeptical philosophy of Voltaire, it is implicitly recognized him as a philosopher, which doesn’t happen in the eyes of a certain academic tradition.

The skepticism of Voltaire can be considered as part of a story that errors of the human spirit. Our problem is slightly different. We would like to try to understand the principles and springs of a form of “modern” skepticism considering its scope, its degree (skepticism “methodical,” “moderate,” “radical”?), or rather its limitations in the sense that Voltaire himself drew criticism. If it shares with the Enlightenment being able to be understood as an instrument of intellectual liberation, a way to teach men to think for themselves, to dare to use their understanding, Voltaire’s skepticism is also related to a current Christian, we might almost say Pascalian, which seeks to emphasize the limits of reason. Dare to doubt and dare to know may well stop Voltaire to be two contradictory philosophical injunctions, to become different times of the same desire to know the world and understand it.

Keywords

Common Sense Eighteenth Century Metaphysical Question Radical Scepticism Religious Dogmatism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Aron, Raymond. 1991. L’opium des intellectuels. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
  2. Bayle Pierre. 1740. Dictionnaire historique et critique, 4 vols. Amsterdam: Brunel.Google Scholar
  3. Brahami, Frédéric. 2001. Dubito ergo sum: Descartes et le Cogito des cartésiens. La lettre clandestine 10: 44–57.Google Scholar
  4. Brandão, Rodrigo. 2008. Voltaire et le scepticisme. Philosophiques 35(1): 261–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charles, Sébastien. 2008. Le scepticisme à l’âge classique: enjeux et perspectives. Philosophiques 35(1): 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cousin, Victor. 1863. Histoire générale de la philosophie depuis les temps les plus anciens jusqu’à la fin du XVIII° siècle. Paris: Didier et Cie.Google Scholar
  7. de Negroni, Barbara. 1997. Doute, scepticisme, pyrrhonisme. In Dictionnaire européen des Lumières, ed. Michel Delon. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  8. Descartes, René. 1897–1913. In Œuvres, vol. 13, ed. C. Adam and P. Tannery. Paris: Léopold Cerf.Google Scholar
  9. Diderot, Denis. 1964. Œuvres philosophiques. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
  10. Dumarsais, César Chesneau. 1996. L’examen de la religion, ou doutes sur la religion dont on cherche l’éclaircissement de bonne foi. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Dumont, Jean-Paul. 1985. Le scepticisme et le phénomène. Essai sur la signification et les origines du pyrrhonisme. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  12. Ferret, Olivier. 2004. Voltaire éditeur de l’Examen de la religion. Revue Voltaire 4: 143–160.Google Scholar
  13. Giocanti, Sylvia. 2001. Penser l’irrésolution: Montaigne, Pascal, La Mothe le Vayer, trois itinéraires sceptiques. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
  14. Hume, David. 2004. A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jung, Carl. 1950. Les Types psychologiques. Paris: Éditions Georg.Google Scholar
  16. Le Ru, Véronique. 2005. Voltaire Newtonien. Le combat d’un philosophe pour la science. Paris: Vuibert.Google Scholar
  17. Martin-Haag, Eliane. 2002. Voltaire: du cartésianisme aux Lumières. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  18. Paganini, Gianni. 1997. Du bon usage du scepticisme: les Doutes des pyrrhoniens. In La philosophie clandestine à l’âge classique, ed. A. McKenna and A. Mothu, 291–306. Paris/Oxford: Universitas-Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Popkin, Richard H. 1995. Histoire du scepticisme d’Erasme à Spinoza. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  20. Popkin, Richard H. 2003. The history of scepticism from Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  21. Pujol, Stéphane. 1994. Douteur ou docteur. Langage et connaissance dans les Dialogues philosophiques de Voltaire. Europe 72(781): 89–101.Google Scholar
  22. Pujol, Stéphane. 2005. Misère du dialogue ou misère de la philosophie. L’impossible mot de la fin. Revue Voltaire 5: 167.Google Scholar
  23. Voltaire. 1877–1885. Œuvres complètes, 51 vols. Paris: Garnier Frères.Google Scholar
  24. Voltaire. 1967. Dictionnaire philosophique, Paris, Garnier, p. 98.Google Scholar
  25. Voltaire. 2006. Lettres philosophiques. Derniers écrits sur Dieu. Paris: GF-Flammarion.Google Scholar
  26. Voltaire. 2007. Questions sur l’Encyclopédie par des amateurs. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Collège International de PhilosophieUniversité de Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense (Paris 10)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations