Advertisement

The Hive and the Pendulum: Universal Metrology and Baroque Science

  • Nicholas Dew
Chapter
Part of the International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées book series (ARCH, volume 208)

Abstract

Early modern scholars and statesmen were acutely aware of the need for improved standards of measurement, albeit for differing reasons. The variety of man-made units across territories and histories was, by the seventeenth century, already a sceptical commonplace, and was understood in terms of the mutability of human institutions. The late seventeenth century saw many scholars advance possible candidates for a universal standard. The most promising of these was the use of a seconds pendulum as a standard for length, a project which was actively pursued by the French Académie Royale des Sciences in the 1670s and 1680s, and remained a goal cherished by savants through the eighteenth century. This paper’s first section places the Académie’s early metrological projects in the context of the scholarly community’s ideal of a universal measurement standard, which was often expressed in ways combining political, theological, and humanistic concerns. Melchisédech Thévenot’s ludic proposal that honeycombs might be a length standard is explored as one example. The second section examines the Académie’s attempts to test the seconds pendulum as a universal length standard, by taking the missions to Uraniborg (1671) and to London (1679) as case studies in the practice of metrological work.

Keywords

Length Standard Seventeenth Century Universal Measure Metal Rule Pendulum Clock 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank all the participants at the Baroque Science workshop at the University of Sydney for their help with this essay, and especially Ofer Gal and Raz Chen-Morris.

References

  1. Alder, Ken. 1995. A revolution to measure: The political economy of the metric system in France. In The values of precision, ed. M. Norton Wise, 39–71. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, Danielle. 2004. Burning the fable of the bees: The incendiary authority of nature. In The moral authority of nature, ed. Lorraine Daston and Fernando Vidal, 74–99. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Armogathe, Jean-Robert. 2001. Un seul poids, une seule mesure: le concept de mesure universelle. XVIIe siècle 213: 631–640.Google Scholar
  4. Arneil, Barbara. 1996. John Locke and America: The defence of English colonialism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bacon, Francis. 2000. The new organon, ed. Lisa Jardine (trans: Silverthorne, Michael). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, Keith M. 1990. Inventing the French revolution: Essays on French political culture in the eighteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, Jim, and Scott Mandelbrote. 1998. The garden, the ark, the tower, the temple: Biblical metaphors of knowledge in early modern Europe. Oxford: Museum of the History of Science/Bodleian Library.Google Scholar
  8. Bernier, François. 1992 [1671]. Requeste des Maistres ès Arts, Professeurs et Regens de l’Université de Paris, présentée à la cour souveraine de Parnasse. In Corpus: revue de philosophie, ed. Sylvia Murr, 20–21: 231–239.Google Scholar
  9. Blamont, Jacques. 2001. La mesure du temps et de l’espace au XVIIe siècle. XVIIe siècle 213: 579–611.Google Scholar
  10. Bodin, Jean. 1583 [1576]. Six Livres de la République. Paris: Jacques Dupuis.Google Scholar
  11. Bodin, Jean. 1992. In On sovereignty, ed. Julian H. Franklin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bonno, Gabriel D. 1955. Les Relations intellectuelles de Locke avec la France, d’après des documents inédits. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Burke, Peter. 1997. Fables of the bees: A case-study in views of nature and society. In Nature and society in historical context, ed. Mikuláš Teich, Roy Porter, and Bo Gustafsson, 112–123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cassini, Giandomenico. 1693. De l’origine et du progrès de l’Astronomie, et de son usage dans la Geographie et dans la Navigation. In [Académie des Sciences], Recueil d’Observations faites en plusieurs voyages par ordre de Sa Majesté, pour perfectionner l’astronomie et la géographie. Separately paginated, 43 pages. Paris: Imprimerie royale. Reprinted in Memoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, 1666–99, 8: 1–52.Google Scholar
  15. Collins, Harry. 1992. Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Orig. ed. 1985.)Google Scholar
  16. Collins, Harry. 2001. Tacit knowledge, trust and the Q of sapphire. Social Studies of Science 31(1): 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Costabel, Pierre. 1987. Picard et l’étalon universel de longueur fondé sur le pendule. In Jean Picard et les débuts de l’astronomie de précision au XVIIe siècle, ed. Guy Picolet, 315–328. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
  18. Cumberland, Richard. 1686. An essay towards the recovery of the Jewish measures and weights, comprehending their monies, by help of ancient standards, compared with ours of England. London: Richard Chiswell, printer to the Royal Society.Google Scholar
  19. Defossez, Léopold. 1946. Les Savants du XVIIe siècle et la mesure du temps. Lausanne: Edition [sic] du Journal Suisse d’Horlogerie et de Bijouterie.Google Scholar
  20. Dew, Nicholas. 2006. Reading travels in the culture of curiosity: Thévenot’s collection of voyages. Journal of Early Modern History 10(1–2): 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dew, Nicholas. 2008. Vers la ligne: circulating measurements around the French Atlantic. In Science and empire in the Atlantic world, ed. James Delbourgo and Nicholas Dew, 53–72. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Dew, Nicholas. 2009. Orientalism in Louis XIV’s France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dew, Nicholas. 2010. Scientific travel in the Atlantic world: The French expedition to Gorée and the Antilles, 1681–1683. British Journal for the History of Science 43: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Findlen, Paula. 1990. Jokes of nature and jokes of knowledge: The playfulness of scientific discourse in early modern Europe. Renaissance Quarterly 43: 292–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Findlen, Paula. 1994. Possessing nature: Museums, collecting and scientific culture in early modern Italy. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Findlen, Paula. 1998. Between carnival and lent: The scientific revolution at the margins of culture. Configurations 6(2): 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Flamsteed, John. 1995–2002. The correspondence of John Flamsteed, the first astronomer royal, ed. E.G. Forbes, L. Murdin, and F. H. Willmoth, 3 vols. Bristol: Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
  28. Fleck, Ludwik. 1979. Genesis and development of a scientific fact (trans: Bradley, Fred and Thaddeus J. Trenn). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Freedberg, David. 2002. The Eye of the Lynx: Galileo, his friends, and the beginnings of modern natural history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Giustini, Pietro Alessandro. 1992. Tito Livio Burattini e la nascita della metrologia scientifica. In La matematizzazione dell’universo: momenti della cultura matematica tra ’500 e ’600, ed. Lino Conti, 360–362. Assisi: Porziuncola.Google Scholar
  31. Greaves, John. 1647. A discourse of the Romane foot, and denarius: from whence, as from two principles, the measures and weights, used by the ancients, may be deduced. London: Printed by M. F. for William Lee.Google Scholar
  32. Hartlib, Samuel. 1655. The reformed common-wealth of bees: Presented in severall letters and observations to Samuel Hartlib, Esq. London: Printed for Giles Calvert.Google Scholar
  33. Haustein, Heinz-Dieter. 2001. Weltchronik des Messens: Universalgeschichte von Mass und Zahl, Geld und Gewicht. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  34. Heilbron, John L. 1993. Weighing imponderables and other quantitative science around 1800. Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences: Supplement to vol. 24, part 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hooke, Robert. 1935. In The diary of Robert Hooke, M.A., M.D., F.R.S., 1672–1680, ed. H.W. Robinson and W. Adams. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  36. Huygens, Christiaan. 1986 [1673]. The pendulum clock, or geometrical demonstrations concerning the motion of pendula as applied to clocks (trans: Blackwell, Richard J., with an introd. by H. J. M. Bos). Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  37. Johns, Adrian. 1998. The nature of the book: Print and knowledge in the making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Koyré, Alexandre. 1953. An experiment in measurement. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 97(2): 222–237.Google Scholar
  39. Kula, Witold. 1985 [1970]. Measures and men (trans: Szreter, R.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lancelot, Claude. 1667. Dissertation sur l’Hemine de Vin, et sur la Livre de Pain de S. Benoist, et des autres anciens Religieux. Paris: Charles Savreux.Google Scholar
  41. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lewis, Rhodri. 2007. Language, mind, and nature: Artificial languages in England from Bacon to Locke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Locke, John. 1953. In Locke’s travels in France, 1675–1679: As related in his journals, correspondence and other papers, ed. John Lough. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Locke, John. 1975. In An essay concerning human understanding, ed. P.H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  45. Locke, John. 1976–1989. The correspondence of John Locke, ed. E.S. de Beer, 8 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Also available from Intelex Past Masters, at: http://library.nlx.com/
  46. Mallard, Alexandre. 1998. Compare, standardize and settle agreement: On some usual metrological problems. Social Studies of Science 28(4): 571–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Matthews, Michael R. 2000. Time for science education: How teaching the history and philosophy of pendulum motion can contribute to science literacy. New York/Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. McKeon, Robert M. 1965. Etablissement de l’astronomie de précision et œuvre d’Adrien Auzout. Doctoral thesis, University of Paris.Google Scholar
  49. Mouton, Gabriel. 1670. Nova mensurarum geometricarum Idea: Et nova methodus eas, et quascumque alias mensuras communicandi, et conservandi in posterùm absque alteratione. In Mouton, Observationes diametrorum solis et lunæ apparentium, meridianarúmque aliquot altitudinum Solis et paucarum fixarum, 427–48. Lyon: Matthæi Liberal.Google Scholar
  50. O’Connell, Joseph. 1993. Metrology: The creation of universality by the circulation of particulars. Social Studies of Science 23(1): 129–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oldenburg, Henry. 1965–1986. The correspondence of Henry Oldenburg, ed. A.R. Hall and M.B. Hall, 13 vols. Madison, Milwaukee, and London: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  52. Olmsted, John W. 1942. The scientific expedition of Jean Richer to Cayenne (1672–1673). Isis 34: 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Olmsted, John W. 1960. The voyage of Jean Richer to Acadia in 1670: A study in the relations of science and navigation under Colbert. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 104(6): 612–634.Google Scholar
  54. Pedersen, Kurt Møller. 1987. Une mission astronomique de Jean Picard: le voyage d’Uraniborg. In Jean Picard et les débuts de l’astronomie de précision au XVIIe siècle, ed. Guy Picolet, 175–203. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
  55. Picard, Jean. 1671. Mesure de la Terre. Paris: Imprimerie royale. Reprinted in Memoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, 166699, 7 (1): 133–192.Google Scholar
  56. Picard, Jean. 1693 [1680]. Voyage d’Uranibourg, ou Observations astronomiques faites en Dannemarck par Monsieur Picard de l’Académie Royale des Sciences. In [Académie des Sciences], Recueil d’Observations faites en plusieurs voyages par ordre de Sa Majesté, pour perfectionner l’astronomie et la géographie. Separately paginated fascicule (29 pp). Paris: Imprimerie royale. Reprinted in Memoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, 166699, 7(1): 193–232.Google Scholar
  57. Picolet, Guy. 1979. Une lettre inédite de l’abbé Picard à Colbert (13 octobre 1671). XVIIe siècle 125: 389–395.Google Scholar
  58. Pliny, the elder. 1991. Natural history: A selection (trans: Healy, John F.). Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
  59. Raylor, Timothy J. 1992. Samuel Hartlib and the commonwealth of bees. In Culture and cultivation in early modern England: Writing and the land, ed. Michael Leslie and Timothy J. Raylor, 91–129. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Sarton, George. 1935. The first explanation of decimal fractions and measures (1585). Together with a history of the decimal idea and a facsimile (no. XVII) of Stevin’s Disme. Isis 23(1): 153–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schaffer, Simon. 2000. Modernity and metrology. In Science and power: The historical foundations of research policies in Europe, ed. L. Guzzetti, 71–91. Luxembourg: European Communities.Google Scholar
  62. Schaffer, Simon. 2009. Newton on the beach: The information order of Principia mathematica. History of Science 47: 243–276.Google Scholar
  63. Shalev, Zur. 2002. Measurer of all things: John Greaves (1602–1652), the great pyramid, and early modern metrology. Journal of the History of Ideas 63(4): 555–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spary, Emma. 1999. The nature of enlightenment. In The sciences in enlightened Europe, ed. William Clark, Jan Golinski, and Simon Schaffer, 272–306. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  65. Thévenot, Melchisédech. 1681. Discours sur l’art de la navigation. In Thévenot, Recueil de voyages. Paris: Estienne Michallet. Separately paginated.Google Scholar
  66. Virgil. 1982. The Georgics (trans: Wilkinson, L.P., Penguin Classics). Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilkins, John. 1668. An essay towards a real character, and philosophical language. London: S. Gellibrand, and John Martyn, printer to the Royal Society.Google Scholar
  68. Woolfson, Jonathan. 2010. The renaissance of bees. Renaissance Studies 24(2): 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Woolhouse, Roger. 2007. Locke: A biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Zupko, Ronald Edward. 1978. French weights and measures before the revolution. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History and Classical StudiesMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations