Advertisement

Baroque Modes and the Production of Knowledge

  • Ofer Gal
  • Raz Chen-Morris
Chapter
Part of the International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées book series (ARCH, volume 208)

Abstract

In his Art of Painting (Fig. 1.1) Johannes Vermeer opens a curtain and lets the observer peek at the crafting of an image. The lavishly dressed painter, his back to the observer, is busy putting to paper the figure of Clio, the muse of history, draped in blue and holding the symbols of her art: the book and the trumpet. On the wall behind her is an elaborate map of the Netherlands (the west facing up), framed by miniature depictions of Dutch towns. Vermeer “juxtapose[s] two kinds of pictorial image” wrote Svetlana Alpers of this painting in her deservedly celebrated analysis: an image fraught with “meanings (art as emblem)” on the one hand, and on the other—an image which serves as a careful “description (art as mapping)” (Alpers 1984, 166). But Vermeer is not commenting on art alone. “The aim of Dutch painters was to capture on a surface a great range of knowledge and information about the world” (Alpers 1984, 122), and Vermeer is setting a contrast between two modes of knowledge: the theatrical, poetic, historical narrative represented by Clio; and the visual exactness and immediacy of the descriptio—the mathematically drawn, factual map (Alpers 1984, 119–123; 166–167).

Keywords

Seventeenth Century Scientific Revolution Causal Account Sensual Detail Spiritual Speculation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alpers, Svetlana. 1984. The art of describing: Dutch art in the seventeenth century. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bal, Mieke. 2001. Quoting Caravaggio: Contemporary art, preposterous history. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Benjamin, Walter. 1963. Ursprung des deutschen Trauerspiels. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Buci-Glucksmann, Christine. 1994. Baroque reason: The aesthetic of modernity (trans: Camiller, P.; intr: B.S. Turner). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Collingwood, R.G. 1945. The idea of nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Croce, Benedetto. 1990. Benedetto croce: Essays on literature and literary criticism (trans. and ann: Moss, M.E.). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  7. Crombie, Alistair C. 1994. Styles of scientific thinking in the European tradition. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  8. Fleck, Ludwik. 1979. Genesis and development of a scientific fact (trans: Bradley, F. and T.J. Trenn), ed. T.S. Kuhn and R.K. Merton. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2005. Metaphysical images and mathematical practices: The archaeology of the inverse square law part I. History of Science xliii: 391–414.Google Scholar
  10. Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2006. The use and non-use of mathematics: The archaeology of the inverse square law part II. History of Science xliv: 49–68.Google Scholar
  11. Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2010a. Baroque optics and the disappearance of the observer. Journal of History of Ideas 71(2): 191–217.Google Scholar
  12. Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2010b. Empiricism without the senses: How the instrument replaced the eye. In The body as object and instrument of knowledge, ed. O. Gal and C. Wolfe, 121–148. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2011. The controversy over the comets: What was it really about? In Controversies in the scientific revolution, ed. Victor Boantza and Marcelo Dascal, 33–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  14. Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2012. Baroque science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gal, Ofer, and Raz Chen-Morris. 2012. Nature’s drawing. Synthese 185(3): 429–466.Google Scholar
  16. Grootenboer, Hanneke. 2005. The rhetoric of perspective: Realism and illusionism in seventeenth-century Dutch still-life painting. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hacking, Ian. 1982. Language, truth and reason. In Rationality and relativism, ed. M. Hollis and S. Lukes, 48–66. Oxford: Blackwell: [Enlarged in: Styles of scientific reasoning, In Post-analytic philosophy, ed. J. Rajchmann, and West C, 146–165. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985].Google Scholar
  18. Hacking, Ian. 1992a. ‘Style’ for historians and philosophers. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
  19. Hacking, Ian. 1992b. Statistical language, statistical truth and statistical reason: The self-authentification of a style of scientific reasoning. In The social dimensions of science, ed.E. McMullin, 130–157. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hall, A.R. 1962 (2nd ed.). The scientific revolution 1500–1800: The formation of the modern scientific attitude. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  21. Hallyn, Fernand. 1993. The poetic structure of the world: Copernicus and Kepler. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  22. Maravall, José Antonio. 1986. The culture of the baroque: Analysis of a historical structure (trans: Cochran, Terry). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  23. Panofsky, Erwin. 1995. What is baroque? In Three essays on criticism, ed. Irving Lavin, 17–90. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Schweber S., and M. Wachter. 2000. Complex systems, modelling and simulation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31(4): 583–609.Google Scholar
  25. Sigerist, Henry E. 1929. William Harvey’s Stellung in der Europaeischer Geistesgeschichte. Archives der Kulturgeschichte 19: 158–68.Google Scholar
  26. Wellek, René. 1963. The concept of baroque in literary scholarship. In Concepts of criticism, 69–127. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  27. White, Helen C., et al. 1971. Seventeenth-century verse and prose, vol. 1. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  28. Wölfflin, Heinrich. 1950. Principles of art history: The problem of the development of style in later art. Mineola: Dover Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unit for History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Science, Technology and Society Graduate ProgramBar Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations