Advertisement

An Efficient Dispersion Control Chart

Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 170)

Abstract

Control chart is the most important Statistical Process Control tool used to monitor reliability and performance of industrial processes. For monitoring process dispersion, \(R\) and \(S\) charts are widely used. These control charts perform better under the ideal assumption of normality but are well known to be very inefficient in presence of outliers or departures from normality. In this study we propose a new control chart for monitoring process dispersion, namely the \(D\) chart, and compared its performance with \(R\) and \(S\) charts using probability to signal as a performance measure. It has been observed that the newly proposed chart is superior to \(R\) chart and is a close competitor to S chart under normality of quality characteristic. When the assumption of normality is violated, \(D\) chart is more powerful than both \(R\) and \(S\) charts. This study will help quality practitioners to choose an efficient and robust alternative to \(R\) and \(S\) charts for monitoring dispersion of industrial processes.

Keywords

Control Chart Monte Carlo Simulations Non-Normality Probability to Signal Process Dispersion Process Monitoring 

References

  1. 1.
    Abbasi SA, Miller A (2011) D chart: an efficient alternative to monitor process dispersion. Lecture notes in engineering and computer science. In: Proceedings of the world congress on engineering and computer science (2011) Vol II, WCECS 2011, 19–21 October, 2011. San Francisco, USA, pp 933–938Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abu-Shawiesh MO, Abdullah MB (2000) Estimating the process standard deviation based on downton’s estimator. Qual Eng 12(3):357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barnett FC, Mullen K, Saw JG (1967) Linear estimates of a population scale parameter. Biometrika 54:551–554MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bissell D (1994) Statistical methods for SPC and TQM. Chapman& Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Downton F (1966) Linear estimates with polynomial coefficients. Biometrika 53(1):129–141MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gonzalez IM, Viles E (2001) Design of R control chart assuming a gamma distribution. Econ Qual Control 16:199–204MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hwang SL, Lin JT, Liang GF, Yau YJ, Yenn TC, Hsu CC (2008) Application control chart concepts of designing a pre-alarm system in the nuclear power plant control room. Nucl Eng Des 238(12):3522–3527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    James PC (1989) \(\text{ C}_pk\) equivalencies. Quality 28(9):75Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levinson WA, Polny A (1999) Spc for tool particle counts. Semicond Int 22(6):117–121Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Masson P (2007) Quality control techniques for routine analysis with liquid chromatography in laboratories. J Chromatogr A 1158(1–2):168–173Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Montgomery DC (2001) Introduction to statistical quality control. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ramalhoto MF, Morais M (1999) Shewhart control charts for the scale parameter of a weibull control variable with fixed and variable sampling intervals. Journal of Applied Statistics 26(1):1129–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ryan PR (2000) Statistical methods for quality improvement. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shewhart WA (1931) Economic control of quality manufactured product. In: Van Nostrand D (ed) Reprinted by the american society for quality control in 1980. Milwauker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang Z, Liang R (2008) Discuss on applying spc to quality management in university education. In: Proceedings of the 9th international conference for young computer scientists. ICYCS 2008, pp 2372–2375Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Woodall WH (2006) The use of control charts in health-care and public-health surveillance. J Qual Technol 38(2):89–104Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of StatisticsThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations