Performance of RANS, URANS and LES in the Prediction of Airflow and Pollutant Dispersion

  • Salim Mohamed Salim
  • Kian Chuan Ong
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 170)


The performance of 3 different CFD numerical approaches, namely RANS, URANS and LES are evaluated to determine their suitability in the prediction of airflow and pollutant dispersion in urban street canyons. Numerical results are evaluated against wind tunnel experimental data available from an online database ( LES was observed to produce more accurate and reliable results compared to both RANS approaches, because LES resolves the inherent fluctuations, thus capturing the turbulent mixing process in the flow field within the canyon. Although URANS also computes for transience, it fails to account for unsteadiness, and hence is not an appropriate replacement for LES.


Air pollution CFD LES RANS URANS Urban street canyon 


  1. 1.
    Britter RE, Hanna SR (2003) Flow and dispersion in urban areas. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 35:1817–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Britter RE, Schatzmann M (2007) Background and justification document to support the model evaluation guidance and protocol, COST Action 732Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gromke C, Buccolieri R, Di Sabatino S, Ruck B (2008) Dispersion study in a street canyon with tree planting by means of wind tunnel and numerical investigations−evaluation of CFD data with experimental data. Atmospheric Environ 42:8640–8650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Di Sabatino S, Buccolieri R, Pulvirenti B, Britter RE (2008) Flow and pollutant dispersion in street canyons using FLUENT and ADMS-urban. Environ Model Assess 13:369–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buccolieri R, Salim SM, Leo LS, Di Sabatino S, Chan A, Ielpo P, de Gennaro G, Gromke C (2011) Analysis of local scale tree-atmosphere interaction on pollutant concentration in idealized street canyons and application to a real urban junction. Atmospheric Environ 45:1702–1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salim SM, Buccolieri R, Chan A, Di Sabatino S (2011) Numerical simulation of atmospheric pollutant dispersion in an urban street canyon: comparison between RANS and LES. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 99:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Salim SM, Chan A, Cheah SC (2011) Numerical simulation of atmospheric pollutant dispersion in tree-lined street canyons: comparison between RANS and LES. Build Environ 46:1735–1746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tominaga Y, Stathopoulos T (2010) Numerical simulation of dispersion around an isolated cubic building: model evaluation of RANS and LES. Build Environ 45:2231–2239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salim SM, Ong KC, Cheah SC (2011) Comparison of RANS, URANS and LES in the prediction of airflow and pollutant dispersion. Lecture notes in engineering and computer science: proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2011, WCECS 2011, San Francisco, 19–21 Oct 2011, pp 673–678Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    CODASC (2008) Concentration data of steet canyons, laboratory of building and environmental aerodynamics, IfH, Karlsruhe Institue of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gromke C, Ruck B (2007) Influence of trees on the dispersion of pollutants in an urban street canyon−experimental investigations of the flow and concentration field. Atmospheric Environ 41:3287–3302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gromke C, Ruck B (2009) On the impact of trees on dispersion processes of traffic emissions in street canyons. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 131:19–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salim SM, Ariff M, Cheah SC (2010) Wall y+ approach for dealing with turbulent flows over a wall mounted cube. Prog Comput Fluid Dyn 10:1206–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    FLUENT 6.3 documentation, Lebanon, U.S.A., 2005Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Castro IP (1981) Measurements in shear layers separating from surface-mounted bluff bodies. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 7:253–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sakamoto H, Haniu H (1988) Aerodynamic forces acting on two square prisms placed vertically in a turbulent boundary layer. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 31:41–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EngineeringTaylor’s UniversitySubang JayaMalaysia
  2. 2.University of NottinghamSemenyihMalaysia

Personalised recommendations