Agroforestry in Tomé-Açu: An Alternative to Pasture in the Amazon

  • Mateus Batistella
  • Édson Luis Bolfe
  • Emilio F. Moran
Chapter
Part of the Human-Environment Interactions book series (HUEN, volume 1)

Abstract

This chapter focuses on historical perspectives of land use in Tomé-Açu using remote sensing as a tool to assess land use/land cover and ecosystem goods and services such as carbon sequestration. The results show that agroforestry systems in Tomé-Açu play an important role at the property and landscape scales, trends that should be monitored as they appear to offer an alternative to conversion of forest to pasture. The Amazon-wide dominant trajectory toward conversion to pasture, based on reduced labor needs, if compared to intensive agroforestry systems, requires much more land to yield the same returns to a household at current management levels. If one considers the potential of agroforestry as a source of carbon sequestration, the returns are even higher and may contribute to the mitigation of greenhouse effects.

References

  1. Anderson, A. B. (1992). Land-use strategies for successful extractive economies. Advances in Economic Botany, 9, 667–678.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K., Bolin, B., Costanza, R., Dasgupta, P., Folke, C., Holling, C., et al. (1995). Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Science, 268, 520–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartelt, D., Koch, J., & Tourinho, M. M. (2000). Anbau von acai (Euterpe oleracea) und kakao (Theobroma sylvestre) in primärwäldern der varzeas am rio Tocantins (Brasilien/Para). Forstarchiv, 71(6), 250–256.Google Scholar
  4. Bastos, T. X. (1972). O estado atual dos conhecimentos das condições climáticas da Amazônia brasileira. In IPEAN (Instituto de Pesquisas e Experimentação Agropecuárias do Norte) (Ed.), Zoneamento agrícola da Amazônia: 1a aproximação (Boletim técnico, no. 54, pp. 68–122). Belém: IPEAN.Google Scholar
  5. Batistella, M., & Moran, E. (2005). Dimensões humanas do uso e cobertura das terras na Amazônia: uma contribuição do LBA. Acta Amazonica, 35, 251–259.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, B. K. (2001). Síntese do processo de ocupação da Amazônia: lições do passado e desafio do presente. In MMA (Ministério do Meio Ambiente) (Ed.), Causas e dinâmica no desmatamento da Amazônia. Brasília: MMA.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, B. K. (2006). Amazônia: geopolítica na virada do III milênio. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond.Google Scholar
  8. Bolfe, E. L. (2010). Desenvolvimento de uma metodologia para a estimativa de biomassa e de carbono em sistemas agroflorestais por meio de imagens orbitais. Doctoral thesis, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil.Google Scholar
  9. Bolfe, E. L., Batistella, M., & Ferreira, M. C. (2009). Biomassa epígea e estoque de carbono de agroflorestas em Tomé-Açu, PA. Cruz Alta. Revista Brasileira de Agroecologia, 4(2), 2171–2175.Google Scholar
  10. Brondizio, E. S., Moran, E. F., Mausel, P., & Wu, Y. (1994). Land-use change in the Amazon estuary: Patterns of caboclo settlement and landscape management. Human Ecology, 22(3), 249–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brondizio, E. S., Moran, E. F., Mausel, P., & Wu, Y. (1996). Land cover in the Amazon estuary: Linking of the thematic mapper with botanical and historical data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 62(8), 921–929.Google Scholar
  12. CAMTA (Cooperativa Agrícola Mista de Tomé-Açu). (1967). Relatos históricos da Cooperativa Agrícola Mista de Tomé Açu. Tomé-Açu: CAMTA.Google Scholar
  13. CAMTA (Cooperativa Agrícola Mista de Tomé-Açu). (1975). Relatos históricos da Cooperativa Agrícola Mista de Tomé Açu. Tomé-Açu: CAMTA.Google Scholar
  14. CAMTA (Cooperativa Agrícola Mista de Tomé-Açu). (1994). Relatório da diretoria da Cooperativa Agrícola Mista de Tomé Açu. Tomé-Açu: CAMTA.Google Scholar
  15. CAMTA (Cooperativa Agrícola Mista de Tomé-Açu). (2009). Associados da CAMTA: Informações disponibilizadas verbalmente pela diretoria da cooperativa. Tomé-Açu: CAMTA.Google Scholar
  16. Conant, F., Rogers, P., Baumgardner, M., Mckell, C., Dasmann, R., & Reining, P. (1983). Resource inventory and baseline study methods for developing countries. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
  17. Crawford, S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crumley, C. L. (1994). Historical ecology: A multidimensional ecological orientation. In C. L. Crumley (Ed.), Historical ecology (pp. 1–16). Santa Fe: School for Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dale, V. H., & Pearson, S. M. (1997). Quantifying habitat fragmentation due to land-use change in Amazonia. In W. F. Laurance & R. Bierregaard Jr. (Eds.), Tropical forest remnants: Ecology, management, and conservation of fragmented communities (pp. 400–409). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Falesi, I. C., Santos, W. H. dos, & Vieira, L. S. (1964). Os solos da colônia agrícola de Tomé Açu (Boletim técnico, no. 44). Belém: Instituto de Pesquisas e Experimentação Agropecuárias do Norte.Google Scholar
  21. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). (1993). Forest resources assessment 1990: Tropical countries (Forestry Paper 112). Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  22. Fearnside, P. M. (1986). Human carrying capacity of the Brazilian rainforest. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Flohrschutz, G. H. H. (1983). Análise econômica de estabelecimentos rurais no município de Tomé Açu, Pará: um estudo de caso (Documentos, 19). Belém: Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Úmido, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária.Google Scholar
  24. Gerber, J. (1997). Beyond dualism: The social construction of nature and the natural and social construction of human beings. Progress in Human Geography, 2(1), 1–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodland, R. J. A., Daly, H. E., & Serafy, S. (1993). The urgent need for rapid transition to global environmental sustainability. Environmental Conservation, 20(4), 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hayashi, N., Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Yamagishi, T. (1999). Reciprocity, trust, and the sense of control: A cross-societal study. Rationality and Society, 11, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Higuchi, N., dos Santos, J., Ribeiro, R. J., Minette, L., & Biot, Y. (1998). Biomassa da parte aérea da vegetação da floresta tropical úmida de terra-firme da Amazônia Brasileira. Acta Amazonica, 28(2), 153–165.Google Scholar
  28. Homma, A. K. O. (1998). Amazônia: meio ambiente e desenvolvimento agrícola. Brasília and Belém: Informação Tecnológica and Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Úmido, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária.Google Scholar
  29. Homma, A. K. O. (2003). História da agricultura na Amazônia: da era pré-colombiana ao terceiro milênio. Brasília: Informação Tecnológica, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária.Google Scholar
  30. Homma, A. K. O. (2004). Dinâmica dos sistemas agroflorestais: o caso da Colônia Agrícola de Tomé-Açu, Pará. Revista Instituto de Estudo Superiores da Amazônia, 2(1/2), 57–65.Google Scholar
  31. IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). (2007). Censo Agropecuário 2006: Resultados Preliminares. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/economia/agropecuaria/censoagro/2006/agropecuario.pdf. Accessed Mar 2010.
  32. INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais). (1996). Projeto PRODES. São José dos Campos: INPE, demonstration CD-ROM.Google Scholar
  33. INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais). (2002). Monitoring of the Brazilian Amazon forest by satellite 2000–2001. São José dos Campos: INPE.Google Scholar
  34. INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais). (2006–2009). PRODES. www.dpi.inpe.br/prodesdigital. Accessed 15 July 2006, 15 Aug 2007, 11 Sept 2008, 17 Aug 2009.
  35. Kates, R. W. (1994). Sustaining life on the Earth. Scientific American, 271(4), 114–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koppen, W. (1948). Climatologia (3rd ed.). Mexico: Fondo Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
  37. Laurance, W. F., Cochrane, M. A., Bergen, S., Fearnside, P. M., Delamônica, P., Barber, C., et al. (2001). The future of the Brazilian Amazon. Science, 291(5503), 438–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mausel, P., Wu, Y., Li, Y., Moran, E. F., & Brondizio, E. S. (1993). Spectral identification of successional stages following deforestation in the Amazon. Geocarto International, 8(4), 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCracken, S., Brondízio, E., Moran, E. F., Nelson, D., Siqueira, A., & Rodriguez-Pedraza, C. (1998). The use of remote sensing and GIS in the collection of survey data on households and land use: Example from the agricultural frontier of the Brazilian Amazon. In Proceedings of the IX Brazilian remote sensing symposium. CD-ROM.Google Scholar
  40. McGinnis, M., & Ostrom, E. (1996). Design principles for local and global commons. In O. R. Young (Ed.), The international political economy and international institutions (Vol. II, pp. 465–493). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  41. Menezes, A. J. E. A. de, Frazão, D. A. C., Homma, A. K. O., Matos, G. B. de, Ishisuka, Y., Rocha, A. C. P. N. da, et al. (2004). Influência da colônia nipo brasileira na formação dos sistemas agroflorestais dos pequenos agricultores familiares de Tomé Açú, Pará. In Anais V Congresso Brasileiro de sistemas agroflorestais: SAFs: desenvolvimento com proteção ambiental, Curitiba (pp. 105–107). Document 98. Colombo: Florestas, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária.Google Scholar
  42. Moran, E. F. (1981). Developing the Amazon. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Moran, E. F. (1993). Deforestation and land-use in the Brazilian Amazon. Human Ecology, 21, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Moran, E. F. (1996). Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. In L. E. Sponsel, T. N. Headland, & R. C. Bailey (Eds.), Tropical deforestation: The human dimension (pp. 149–164). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Moran, E. F., & Brondizio, E. S. (1998). Land-use change after deforestation in Amazônia. In D. Liverman, E. Moran, R. Rindfuss, & P. Stern (Eds.), People and pixels: Applications of remote sensing in the social sciences (pp. 94–120). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  46. Moran, E. F., Brondizio, E. F., Li, Y., Mausel, P., & Wu, Y. (1994a). Discrimination between advanced secondary succession and mature moist forest near Altamira, Brazil, using Landsat TM data. In Proceedings, 60th annual meeting for American society of photogrammetry and remote sensing, Reno, Nevada (pp. 350–364). Bethesda: American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing/American Congress on Surveying and Mapping.Google Scholar
  47. Moran, E. F., Brondizio, E. S., Mausel, P., & Wu, Y. (1994b). Integrating Amazonian vegetation, land-use, and satellite data. BioScience, 44(5), 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moran, E. F., Packer, A., Brondizio, E. S., & Tucker, J. (1996). Restoration of vegetation cover in the eastern Amazon. Ecological Economics, 18, 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moran, E., Ostrom, E., & Randolph, J. C. (1998). A multilevel approach to studying global environmental change in forest ecosystems (CIPEC Working Paper CWP-98-07). Bloomington: Center for the Study of Institutions, Population, and Environmental Change (CIPEC), Indiana University.Google Scholar
  50. Nepstad, D. C., Verssimo, A., Alencar, A., Nobre, C., Lima, E., Lefebvre, P., et al. (1999). Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire. Nature, 398, 505–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nobre, C. A., Sampaio, G., & Salazar, L. (2007). Mudanças climáticas e Amazônia. Ciência e Cultura, 59(3), 22–27. http://cienciaecultura.bvs.br. Accessed 27 Aug 2007.
  52. NRC (National Research Council). (1998). Global environmental change: Research pathways for the next decade. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  53. Ostrom, V. (1997). The meaning of democracy and the vulnerability of democracies: A response to Tocqueville’s challenge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  54. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  55. Porto-Gonçalves, C. W. (2001). Amazônia, Amazônias (2nd ed.). São Paulo: Contexto.Google Scholar
  56. Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M. J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rodrigues, T. E., & Baena, A. R. C. (1974). Solos da Rodovia PA-02; Trecho km 65 ao km 111 (Tomé Açu – Paragominas) (Boletim técnico, no. 55). Belém: Instituto de Pesquisas e Experimentação Agropecuárias do Norte.Google Scholar
  58. Rodrigues, T. E., Santos, P. L. dos, Rolim, P. A. M., Santos, E., Rego, R. S., Silva, J. M. L. da, et al. (2001). Caracterização e classificação dos solos do município de Tomé-Açu, Pará (Embrapa Amazônia Oriental Documentos, 117). Belém: Amazônia Oriental, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária.Google Scholar
  59. Sader, S. A., & Joyce, A. T. (1985). Relationship between forest clearing and bio-physical factors in a tropical environment. Applied Geography, 17, 143–162.Google Scholar
  60. Sanchez, P. A. (1976). Properties and management of soils in the tropics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  61. SECTAM (Secretaria Executiva de Ciência, Tecnologia e Meio Ambiente do Pará). (2009). Meteorologia 2009. http://www.para30graus.pa.gov.br/meteorologia.htm. Accessed 15 Aug 2009.
  62. Silva, R. P. (2007). Alometria, estoque e dinâmica da biomassa de florestas primárias e secundárias na região de Manaus (AM). Doctoral thesis, Ciências Florestais, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Brasil.Google Scholar
  63. Skole, D., & Tucker, C. J. (1993). Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon: Satellite data from 1987 to 1988. Science, 260, 1905–1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Smith, N., Williams, J., Plucknett, D., & Talbot, J. (1992). Tropical forests and their crops. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Smith, N., Dubois, J., Current, D., Lutz, E., & Clement, C. (1998). Experiências agroflorestais na Amazônia Brasileira: restrições e oportunidades. Brasília: Programa Piloto para a Proteção das Florestas Tropicais do Brasil.Google Scholar
  66. Stern, P. C., Young, O. R., & Druckman, D. (Eds.). (1992). Global environmental change: Understanding the human dimensions. National Research Council Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  67. Stolberg-Wernigerode, A. G. Zu, & Flohrschutz, G. H. H. (1982). Levantamento de plantios mistos na colônia agrícola de Tomé Açu, Pará (Document 6). Belém: Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Úmido, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária.Google Scholar
  68. Subler, S. (1993). Mechanisms of nutrient retention and recycling in a chronosequence of Amazonian agroforestry systems: Comparisons with natural forest ecosystems. Ph.D. dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  69. Subler, S., & Uhl, C. (1990). Japanese agroforestry in Amazônia: A case study in Tomé Açu, Brazil. In A. B. Anderson (Ed.), Alternatives to deforestation: Steps toward sustainable use of the Amazon rainforest (pp. 152–166). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Tomé-Açu (Prefeitura Municipal de Tomé-Açu). (2007) História de Tomé-Açu. http://www.pmtomeacu.com.br. Accessed Sep 2007.
  71. Tsunoda, F. (1988). Canção da Amazônia: uma saga na selva. Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves.Google Scholar
  72. Turner, B. L., II, Clark, W. C., Kates, R. W., Richards, J. F., Mathews, J. T., & Meyer, W. B. (Eds.). (1990). The Earth as transformed by human action. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Turner, B. L. II, Moss, R. H., & Skole, D. L. (1993). Relating land-use and global land cover change: A proposal for an IGB-HDP core project. Joint publication of International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (Report No. 5) and International Human Dimensions Programme (Report No. 24). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  74. Turner, B. L. II, Skole, D., Sanderson, S., Fischer, G., Fresco, L., & Leemans, R. (Eds.). (1995). Land-use and land-cover change: Science/research plan. Joint publication of International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (Report No. 35) and International Human Dimensions Programme (Report No. 7). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  75. Uhl, C., & Subler, S. (1988). Asian farmers: Stewards of Amazônia. Garden, 12(5), 16–20.Google Scholar
  76. Wood, C. H., & Skole, D. (1998). Linking satellite, census, and survey data to study deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. In D. Liverman, E. Moran, R. Rindfuss, & P. Stern (Eds.), People and pixels: Applications of remote sensing in the social sciences (pp. 70–93). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  77. Wood – no date given in citation, p. 2Google Scholar
  78. Yamada, M. (1999). Japanese immigrant agroforestry in the Brazilian Amazon: A case study of sustainable rural development in the tropics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  79. Yamada, M. (2009). Uma breve história de desenvolvimento agroflorestal Nikkei na Amazônia: o caso da colônia de Tomé-Açu. In R. Porro (Ed.), Alternativa agroflorestal na Amazônia em transformação (pp. 691–704). Brasília: Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária.Google Scholar
  80. Yamada, M., & Gholz, H. L. (2002). An evaluation of agroforestry systems as a rural development option for the Brazilian Amazon. Agroforestry Systems, 55(2), 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yared, J. A. G., & Veiga, J. B. (1985). Sistemas agroflorestais na colônia agrícola de Tomé Açu, Pará, Brasil. In Informe del taller sobre investigacion agroforestal en la region Amazonica (pp. 128–164). Nairobi: International Center for Research in Agroforestry/Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture/United States Agency for International Development.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mateus Batistella
    • 1
  • Édson Luis Bolfe
    • 1
  • Emilio F. Moran
    • 2
  1. 1.Embrapa Monitoramento por SatéliteCampinasBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Anthropology, Anthropological Center for Training and Research on Global Environmental Change, School of Public and Environmental AffairsIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations