Advertisement

Practice as a Key Idea in Understanding Work-Based Learning

  • Paul Hager
Chapter

Abstract

There has been a prominent trend in recent decades for theorising within the arts and social sciences to appeal to human practices as the fundamental bearers of understanding, intelligibility and meanings. This effect of this ‘practice turn’ is that the once-favoured mental entity concepts of earlier theorising (beliefs, desires, emotions and purposes) are displaced by concepts associated with human practices (embodied capacities, know-how, skills, tacit understanding and dispositions). The practice turn has a strong philosophical lineage including Hubert Dreyfus (inspired significantly by Heidegger), Alasdair MacIntyre (strongly influenced by Aristotle) and Theodore Schatzki (strongly influenced by Wittgenstein). Other philosophers influential amongst practice theorists are Dewey, Brandom and Charles Taylor. As well, leading social theorists (e.g. Bourdieu, Giddens) have also produced detailed accounts of practice.

The practice turn is evident in diverse disciplines such as philosophy, sociology, history, anthropology, cultural theory and science and technology studies. Not surprisingly, the concept of practice has also featured increasingly in recent writings on education and learning. However, it is noticeable that the term practice is employed in very diverse ways in these literatures, though most writers appear to take the meaning of ‘practice’ to be unproblematic. This chapter will, firstly, offer an overview of the main different ways in which various writers construe something as a practice. Advantages and limitations of various understandings of the term practice will be discussed. In particular, this chapter will examine the possibilities and limitations for illuminating work-based learning that result from adopting various construals of the term practice.

Keywords

Workplace Learning Rich Understanding Human Practice Practice Theory Sociocultural Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2008). On the practise of practice: In-tensions and ex-tensions in the ongoing reconfiguration of practices. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of new approaches in management and organization (pp. 112–131). Los Angeles: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer, M. (1998). Realism and morphogenesis. In R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  5. Beckett, D., & Hager, P. (2002). Life, work and learning: Practice in postmodernity. Routledge International Studies in the Philosophy of Education 14. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Boreham, N. (2004). A theory of collective competence: Challenging the neo-liberal individualisation of performance at work. British Journal of Educational Studies, 52(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boreham, N., & Morgan, C. (2004). A sociocultural analysis of organisational learning. Oxford Review of Education, 30(3), 308–325.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. J. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching and research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Dreyfus, H. (2001). On the internet. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  14. Elkjaer, B. (2003). Organizational learning with a pragmatic slant. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(5), 481–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Towards an activity-theoretical reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.Google Scholar
  17. Engeström, Y. (2008). From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fenwick, T. (2012). Matter-ings of knowing and doing: Sociomaterial approaches to understanding practice. In P. Hager, A. Lee, & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice, learning and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2003). Learning as apprentices in the contemporary UK workplace: Creating and managing expansive and restrictive participation. Journal of Education and Work, 16(4), 407–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2004). Expansive learning environments: Integrating organisational and personal development. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 126–144). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Garavan, T. N., & McCarthy, A. (2008). Collective learning processes and human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(4), 451–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning (with the collaboration of D. Nicolini). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Green, B. (Ed.). (2009). Understanding and researching professional practice. Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Guile, D., & Okumoto, K. (2007). Developing vocational practice in the jewelry sector through the incubation of a new “project-object”. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(4), 252–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hager, P. (2011a). Theories of workplace learning. In M. Malloch, L. Cairns, K. Evans, & B. N. O’Connor (Eds.), The Sage handbook of workplace learning (pp. 17–31). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Hager, P. (2011b). Refurbishing MacIntyre’s account of practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(3), 545–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hager, P., & Halliday, J. (2006). Recovering informal learning: Wisdom, judgement and community. Dordrecht: Springer (re-issued in paperback 2009).Google Scholar
  29. Hager, P., & Hodkinson, P. (2009). Moving beyond the metaphor of transfer of learning. British Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 619–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Higgins, C. (2003). MacIntyre’s moral theory and the possibility of an aretaic ethics of teaching. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 37(2), 279–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Higgins, C. (2010). The good life of teaching: An ethics of professional practice. Oxford/Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. Hodkinson, P., & Hodkinson, H. (2004). The complexities of workplace learning: Problems and dangers in trying to measure attainment. In H. Rainbird, A. Fuller, & A. Munro (Eds.), Workplace learning in context (pp. 259–275). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G., & James, D. (2008). Understanding learning culturally: Overcoming the dualism between social and individual views of learning. Vocations and Learning, 1(1), 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kemmis, S. (2005). Knowing practice: Searching for saliences. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 13(3), 391–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kemmis, S. (2008). What is professional practice? In C. Kanes (Ed.), Developing professional practice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  39. MacIntyre, A. (1990). Three rival versions of moral enquiry. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  40. MacIntyre, A. C. (1994). A partial response to my critics. In: Horton, J., & Mendus, S. (eds.). After MacIntyre: Critical perspectives on the work of Alasdair MacIntyre (pp. 283–304). Cambridge: Polity Press, in association with Blackwell Publishers Ltd., Oxford.Google Scholar
  41. MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  42. Marsick, V., & Watkins, K. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (Eds.). (2003). Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  44. Osberg, D., & Biesta, G. (2007). Beyond presence: Epistemological and pedagogical implications of “strong” emergence. Interchange, 38(1), 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Polkinghorne, D. E. (2004). Practice and the human sciences: The case for a judgement-based practice of care. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  46. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Towards a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. V. Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Schatzki, T. R. (2005). The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26, 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schatzki, T. R. (2006). On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27, 1863–1873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  53. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  54. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.Google Scholar
  55. Shotter, J. (2008). Dialogism and polyphony in organizing theorizing in organization studies: Action guiding anticipations and the continuous creation of novelty. Organization Studies, 29(4), 501–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stacey, R. (2005). Experiencing emergence in organizations: Local interaction and the emergence of global pattern. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Stacey, R., & Griffin, D. (Eds.). (2005). A complexity perspective on researching organizations: Local taking experience seriously. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Tsoukas, H. (2005). Afterword: Why language matters in the analysis of organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(1), 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tuomi-Gröhn, T., & Engeström, Y. (Eds.). (2003). Between school and work: New perspectives on transfer and boundary-crossing. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  61. Usher, R., & Edwards, R. (2007). Lifelong learning: Signs, discourses, practices. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  62. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and Social ScienceUniversity of TechnologySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations