Advertisement

The Concept of the Rule of Law

  • Courtney Taylor HamaraEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (IUSGENT, volume 18)

Abstract

The Rule of Law is an important political ideal, which has achieved unprecedented support; this has, in turn, given rise to unmatched rhetorical power. The concept is frequently invoked by politicians, the media and scholars in attempts to justify or condemn state actions, political decisions, or whole legal systems. So what is the Rule of Law? What state of affairs does the term connote? What conditions must be present for a claim that the Rule of Law exists to be legitimate? Unfortunately, the only thing that seems to consistently garner agreement within Rule of Law discourse is that there is pervasive disagreement within Rule of Law discourse. The author of this chapter argues that the radical disagreement that currently surrounds the Rule of Law is evidence of undisciplined conceptual theorizing and sketches some basic methodological points about conceptual analysis, which have been overlooked by current theorists engaged in Rule of Law discourse. In order to move towards a shared understanding of the Rule of Law and thus enable meaningful discourse, it is necessary to reconsider the concept in light of these considerations. It is a responsibility to clarify this concept in order to ensure that our most important and salient political discussions and decisions have meaning and merit, not just force.

Keywords

Conceptual Analysis Common Good Current Usage Formal Legality Reflective Equilibrium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aquinas, T. 1947. Summa Theologica. Available at: http://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/aquinas/summa/sum227.htm.
  2. Aristotle. 2000. Politics. Trans. B. Jowett. Mineola: Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Beeson, A. 2006. ACLU calls on U.N. Human Rights Committee to hold U.S. Government accountable. American Civil Liberties Union, 13 March 2006. Available at: http://www.aclu.org/intlhumanrights/gen/24500 prs20060313.html.
  4. Bellamy, R. 2007. Political constitutionalism: A republican defence of the constitutionality of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berlin, I. 1999. The purpose of philosophy. In Concepts and categories: Philosophical essays, ed. H. Hardy. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  6. Feinberg, J. 1973. Social philosophy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Finnis, J. 1980. Natural law and natural rights. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  8. Fuller, L.L. 1969. The morality of law, 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Giudice, M. 2005. The significance of contingent relations in the philosophy of law. PhD dissertation, Hamilton: McMaster University.Google Scholar
  10. Hampton, J. 1994. Democracy and the rule of law. In The rule of law: Nomos 36, ed. I. Shapiro. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hayek, F.A. 1944. The road to serfdom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kramer, M.H. 2004. Where law and morality meet. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Locke, J. 1689. Second treatise of government. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  14. Montesquieu, Ch. 1748. Spirit of laws. London: Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
  15. Olshansky, B. 2006. US builds new Guantanamo prison. Breaking News, 12 January 2006. Available at: http://www.breakingnews.ie/archives/2006/0112/world/cwmhsnkfgboj/.
  16. Ratner, M. 2004. A mixed verdict on the terror war: Detainees have right to US courts, justices rule. CNN.com, 29 June 2004.Google Scholar
  17. Raz, J. 1979. The authority of law. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Skinner, Q. 1984. The idea of negative liberty: Philosophical and historical perspectives. In Philosophy in history: Essays on the historiography of philosophy, ed. R. Rorty et al. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Stavropoulos, N. 2001. Hart’s semantics. In Hart’s postscript: Essays on the postscript to The concept of law, ed. J. Coleman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Taiwo, O. 1999. The rule of law: The new leviathan? Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 12: 151–168.Google Scholar
  21. Tamanaha, B.Z. 2004. On the rule of law: History, politics, theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Waldron, J. 2002. Is the rule of law an essentially contested concept (in Florida)? Law and Philosophy 21: 137–164.Google Scholar
  23. Waldron, J. 2008. The concept and the rule of law. Georgia Law Review 43: 1.Google Scholar
  24. Waluchow, W.J. 2007. A common law theory of judicial review: The living tree. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.McMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations