Skip to main content

Slovene Socialist Early Childhood Education: Returning, Surpassing and Reinterpreting History

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Logics of Socialist Education

Part of the book series: Explorations of Educational Purpose ((EXEP,volume 24))

Abstract

This chapter re-examines the system and pedagogical concepts of Slovene preschools from the end of World War II to Slovenia’s independence in 1991 in order to draw up a historical context into which recent developments in preschool education in Slovenia can be better understood. Key characteristics of socialist preschooling in Slovenia in this period are explored, including the establishment of a unified system for all the preschool-aged children, from 1 year old to entry to elementary school, this extending to the introduction of the 1979 Educational Program, a central curriculum for preschools in the Socialist Republic of Slovenia. Attention is then given to some of the external and internal critiques, including those by Slovene and Yugoslav academics, contributing to some changes in practice prior to 1991 that were also connected to policy trends in non-socialist contexts. Based on this analysis of the socialist period, and the comparative work, I conclude that, contrary to more conventional assessments, the socialist period brought some important advances to early education in Slovenia that included the unitary system of preschools, a wide net of relatively high-quality preschools and the public concern for all the children in the local community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The author of this chapter was the consultant (psychologist) in the largest Slovene preschool (for approximately 3,000 children) from the mid-1980s until 1991 and is currently a lecturer for developmental psychology in the Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana.

  2. 2.

    The author of this chapter was one of the four authors of this section of the White Paper (1996).

  3. 3.

    The People’s Republic of Slovenia was established in 1947, soon after the establishment of new Yugoslavia. With the 1963 Constitution, it was renamed as the Socialist Republic of Slovenia.

  4. 4.

    In comparison with 12 EU countries and USA the proportion of children between four and six in Slovene preschools was quite low (i.e. 53% of 4 year children in Slovene preschools were lower than in ten countries compared). The proportion of children under 3 years was high but hardly comparable because in the majority of countries children of that age mostly attended private institutions (White Paper 1996: 60).

  5. 5.

    Private preschool institutions were not allowed in the Socialist Republic of Slovenia, but nevertheless there were (and still are) unregistered people who take care of one or a few children.

  6. 6.

    Children came to preschool at different times depending of their parents’ work schedules, but most of them stayed in preschool for about 9 h. According to the Preschool Education and Care Act (1980) preschools provided the education and care for all the children in the local community.

  7. 7.

    Each of the six republics of the SFRY had a degree of autonomy with respect to organising their own systems of ‘national’ education. The Yugoslav Communist party defined the basic values of education, however, such that the preschool systems and educational concepts across Yugoslavian republics were similar.

  8. 8.

    Even though psychologists stress that there is no clear-cut division between work and play, in this concept play signifies everything which is not formal learning, for example, didactic games, singing and counting-out rhymes, debates and storytelling with the help of visual prompts (Educational Program 1979: 101).

  9. 9.

    Kolar et al. (1969: 41) explain that tasks in educational work with preschool children are a form of activity with the defined contents of participation, appropriate for the age of children, and are an intermediary stage between play and work, which lacks neither attractiveness nor spontaneity, but at the same time leads to realisable goals.

  10. 10.

    To work was one of the ideals of the socialist ideology. As all women were encouraged to be full-time employed, one of the basic educational aims in families and in preschools was to develop working habits in children (Kolar 1977: 215–216).

  11. 11.

    Here, the coordination between family and institutional education is referred to.

  12. 12.

    By way of comparison, let us mention the former German Democratic Republic. There, each child from the age of three could be admitted into preschool. All programs were all-day and free, and the curriculum was centrally, state controlled (Tietze et al. 1996).

  13. 13.

    According to Early Childhood Education and Care in Europe: Tackling Social and Cultural Inequalities (2009: 10) in the EU, only the Nordic states (except Denmark), Latvia and Slovenia currently have unitary systems of preschool education and care that includes children from the age of one through to school age.

  14. 14.

    Although the ideological aim is evident, the formation of a child’s character in accordance to the ideal of adult (self-manager) in self-managing socialistic society, it also coincides with prevailing developmental thinking of the time. James (1999) talks about the model of ‘developing child’, the most used concept in psychological research, according to which the child is ‘not yet’ adult but has the potentials to become. Flaker (1990) is even more radical saying that this view sees the child as ‘deviant’ and the childhood as ‘sickness’ which has to be ‘cured’ by education.

  15. 15.

    Moss (in Kroflič 2011: 19) criticises Anglo-American neoliberal word in which the education of young children is still often formed as a market with private provision and as business. Such thinking is just the opposite of the idea we can find in Nordic countries and (as he knows) also in Slovenia that education is seen as public good which must engage all children and their families.

  16. 16.

    Bergant (1981: 95) writes, ‘Within them [local communities] control over the life and needs of individual people could be re-established, as well as a closer control over the life of the youth’ (author’s emphasis).

  17. 17.

    Criticism of the acceleration of development as the consequence of a wrong interpretation of Piaget’s theory was first made in the 1980s. Today, the constructivist interpretation of Piaget’s theory dominates early childhood education; it does not see the main aim of early childhood education to be accelerating the structural changes in the child’s thinking in order for him/her to reach a higher developmental stage, but rather supporting the child’s development (Zigler and Stevenson 1993).

  18. 18.

    Kolar et al. (1969: 129) claim that ‘the daily schedule allows normal physical development, because it defines the time for eating, sleeping…’

  19. 19.

    The Educational Program (1979) stipulated in more than one place what tasks (and how many times a week) the preschool teacher should carry out. For instance, once a week a directed musical task should be done for children above the age of five, in which three or four activities should be integrated (Ibid: 124).

  20. 20.

    When a colleague and I visited the Faculty of Education in Madrid (Spain) a couple of years ago, we witnessed a much higher degree of schoolisation (i.e. the absence of any specific preschool doctrine) than Slovenia has ever known both in the education of preschool teachers and in the preschool we visited (which had been introduced to us as a high-quality one).

  21. 21.

    Eight years ago, I wrote my doctoral thesis on the same topic (Batistič Zorec 2003), and the invitation to write this chapter gave me the opportunity to rethink my positions and arguments and put them in the contemporary context. I have tried to follow what Bradiotti (in Bahovec 1999) said ‘the power of repeating … requires memory, replacement and dedication to change’, and so I continue to evaluate history in order to know the complexities of the present.

References

  • Apple, M. W., & King, N. (1990). Economics and control in everyday school life. In M. W. Apple (Ed.), Ideology and curriculum (pp. 43–60). New York/London: Ruthledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babić, N. (1989). Obrazovanje odgajatelja – bitna pretpostavka unapređivanja predškolskog odgoja. In M. Blažič (Ed.), Vzgojitelj – kreator predšolske vzgoje, VII. Posvetovanje VVO Slovenije (pp. 40–47). Novo Mesto: Skupnost vzgojnovarstvenih organizacij Slovenije.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahovec, E. D. (1999). Pogovor z Rosi Braidotti. Delta, 4(3–4), 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahovec, E. D., & Kodelja, Z. (1996). Vrtci za današnji čas. Ljubljana: Center za kulturološke raziskave pri Pedagoškem inštitutu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batistič Zorec, M. (2003). Razvojna psihologija in vzgoja v vrtcih. Ljubljana: Inštitut za psihologijo osebnosti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergant, M. (1981). Družina – zakon – ljubezen na razpotjih. Ljubljana: Zavod SRS za šolstvo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergant, M., Kokalj, S. & Levičnik, I. (1982). Predšolska pedagogika, 2. zvezek. Ljubljana: Zavod SR Slovenije za šolstvo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, T. (1997). Early childhood education. London: Hodger & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (1994). Deconstructing developmental psychology. London/New York: Rutledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotič, J. (1998). Normalno in patološko v teoriji vzgoje: od institucionalizacije otroštva k nadzorovanju materinstva in medikalizaciji vzgoje. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Filozofska fakulteta, neobjavljeno magistrsko delo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, W. (1992). Theories of development: Concepts and applications. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum For Preschools [Kurikulum za vrtce]. (1999). Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za šolstvo in šport, Urad za šolstvo.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Batistič, M. (1990). Vpliv institucionalne predšolske vzgoje na socialno emocionalni razvoj otroka: Otrokove razvojne potrebe in ravnanje vzgojiteljev, neobjavljena magistrska naloga. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolanc, A. (1970). Varstvo in vzgoja predšolskih otrok. In V. Schmidt, V. Melik, & F. Ostanek (Eds.), Osnovna šola na Slovenskem 1869–1969 (pp. 663–693). Ljubljana: Slovenski šolski muzej.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolanc, A., Levičnik, I., Kolar, N., Smasek, L., & Glogovac, Z. (1975). Trideset let socialistične predšolske vzgoje. Ljubljana: Skupnost vzgojno varstvenih zavodov Slovenije, Zveza skupnosti otroškega varstva Slovenije, Zveza prijateljev mladine Slovenije.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education and Care for Preschool Children Act [Zakon o vzgojnovarstveni dejavnosti za predšolske otroke]. (1971). Uradni list SRS, št. 28–181/71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). (2009). Early childhood education and care in Europe: Tackling social and cultural inequalities. Brussels: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Educational Program for Education and Care of Preschool Children [Vzgojni program za vzgojo in varstvo predšolskih otrok]. (1979). Ljubljana: Zavod SR Slovenije za šolstvo (2nd ed. 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Emilson, A., & Folkesson, A. (2006). Children’s participation and teacher control. Early Childhood Development and Care, 176(3–4), 219–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenech, M., Sumsion, J., Robertson, G., & Goodfellow, J. (2008). The regulatory environment: a source of job (dis)satisfaction for early childhood professionals? Early Child Development and Care, 178(1), 1–14. First published on: 04 October 2006 (First).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaker, V. (1990). Otrokove pravice – starševska zagata: k pravicam staršev ali k starševskemu etičnemu kodeksu. In Z. Pavlovič (Ed.), Psihološke pravice otrok (simbioza in avtonomija). Gradivo 10. Mednarodne poletne šole Sekcije za skupinsko dinamiko (pp. 45–53). Ljubljana: Društvo psihologov Slovenije.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punishment: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvat, L. (1980). Nekateri psihološki problemi načrtovanja ciljev in metod dela s predšolskimi otroki. In Posvetovanje psihologov Slovenije. Ljubljana, 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvat, L. (1986). Predškolsko vaspitanje i intelektualni razvoj. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, A. (1999). Researching children’s social competence: Methods and models. In M. Woodhead, D. Faulkner, & K. Littelton (Eds.), Making sense of social development (pp. 231–249). London/New York: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamenov, E. (1987). Predškolska pedagogija I. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokalj, S. & Levičnik, I. (1982). Predšolska pedagogika, 1 zvezek. Ljubljana: Zavod SR Slovenije za šolstvo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolar, N. (1977). Priprava otroka na šolo. In M. Bergant, T. Badjura, et al. (Eds.), Razvijajmo sposobnosti predšolskega otroka. Zveza prijateljev mladine Slovenije: Ljubljana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolar, N., Cilenšek, B., Osterc, L., & Černe, P. (1969). Nekaj poglavij iz predšolske pedagogike in metodike. Ljubljana: Zavod za prosvetno pedagoško službo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroflič, R. (2011). Paranoično starševstvo (interview with Pete Moss). Emzin, revija za kulturo, 21(1–2), 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjanović, S. (1976). Teze za diskusiju o temi  »  Sistem predškolskog vaspitanja u SFRJ«. Predškolsko dete, 3, 227–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjanovič Umek, L. (1980). Nekateri psihološki vidiki analize vzgojnega programa za predšolske otroke (pp. 29–31). Ljubljana: Posvetovanje psihologov Slovenije.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miljak, A. (1988). Od intuicijskog do znanstveno zasnovanog predškolskog programa. Predškolsko dete, 3, 167–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. (1994). The early childhood league in Europe: problems and possibilities in cross-national comparisons of levels of provision. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 2, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P., & Urban, M. (2010). Democracy and experimentation: Two fundamental values for education. Bertelsmann Stiftung. http://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/bst/de/media/xcms_bst_dms_32994__2.pdf

  • Pavlič, S. (1992). Predšolske ustanove na Slovenskem 1834–1945. Ljubljana: Zavod RS za šolstvo in šport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pešić, M. (1987). Vrednovanje predškolskih vaspitnih programa. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pravilnik o normativih in minimalnih tehničnih pogojih za prostor in opremo vrtca. (2000). Uradni list RS, 73/2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preschool Education and Care Act [Zakon o vzgoji in varstvu predšolskih otrok]. (1980). Uradni list SRS, št. 5/1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Špoljar, K. (1987). Analiza interakcij vzgojitelj – otrok za zboljševanje kakovosti vzgojnoizo-braževalnega dela v vrtcih. Vzgoja in izobraževanje 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, F. B. (1994). The psychological development of children. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietze, W., Cryer, D., Bairraõ, J., Palacios, J., & Wetzel, G. (1996). Comparison of observed process quality in early child care and education programs in five countries. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11, 447–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomšič, V. (1976). Ženska, delo, družina, družba. Ljubljana: ČZP Komunist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weikart, D. P., Olmsted, P. P., & Montie, J. (Eds.). (2003). A world of preschool experience. The IEA preprimary project phase 2. Ypsilanti: High/Scope press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White Paper on Education in Republic of Slovenia. (1996). Ljubljana: Ministrsty of Education and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • White Paper on Education in Republic of Slovenia [Bela knjiga o vzgoji in izobraževanju v Republiki Sloveniji]. (2011). http://www.belaknjiga2011.si/

  • Zadnikar, D. (1993). Ali je šolo mogoče kritizirati? Časopis za kritiko znanosti, 160–161, 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zigler, E., & Stevenson, M. F. (1993). Children in a changing world: Development and social issues. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank the editors for their feedback and editorial suggestions and my dear colleague Zsuzsa Millei in particular for her insightful comments and suggestions in regard to conceptualising and structuring the chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcela Batistič Zorec .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zorec, M.B. (2012). Slovene Socialist Early Childhood Education: Returning, Surpassing and Reinterpreting History. In: Griffiths, T., Millei, Z. (eds) Logics of Socialist Education. Explorations of Educational Purpose, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4728-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics