Advertisement

Experimental Study of Hot Mixed Mortars in Comparison with Lime Putty and Hydrate Mortars

  • Jan Válek
  • Tomáš Matas
Conference paper
Part of the RILEM Bookseries book series (RILEM, volume 7)

Abstract

An experiment was carried out in order to understand the influence of hot mixing on the properties of hardened mortars in comparison with mortars made of lime hydrate and lime putty. Lime from the same quarry and producer was used in the form of lime hydrate, lime putty and quicklime. Two types of quicklime were used, varying in their calcination conditions and also their reactivity. Standard specimens of 40 × 40 × 160 mm were cast and evaluated after curing. Mechanical (compressive and flexural strength) and physical properties (open porosity, bulk density, capillary absorption) were determined on the specimens of hardened mortars. Thin sections of the mortars were prepared and evaluated using polarising microscopy in order to describe the structure of mortar including the presence of binder related particles. The produced hot mixed mortars had hardened properties comparable with the lime putty and lime hydrate mortars. Due to the micro-cracks in the binding matrix the hot mixed mortars showed higher porosity and capillary absorption. The heterogeneity of the hot mixed mortars was a result of the preparation technology.

Keywords

Compressive Strength Flexural Strength Open Porosity Mortar Specimen Lime Hydrate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The research has been carried out with the support of the Institutional Research Plan AV0Z20710524 and LA 09008.

References

  1. 1.
    Groot, C., Ashall, G., Hughes, J.J. (eds.): Characterisation of Old Mortars with Respect to their Repair – RILEM Report 28, RILEM Bagenux (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Valek, J., Zeman, A.: Lime particles in hot mixed mortars: characterisation and technological links. In: Proceedings of the 12th Euroseminar on Microscope Applied to Building Materials, TU Dortmund, pp. 341–350 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Malinowski, E., Hansen, T.: Hot lime mortar in conservation – repair and replastering of the Façades of Läckö Castle. In: Proceedings of the 1st Historical Mortars Conference, Lisbon. LNEC (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bakolas, A., Biscontin, G., Moropoulou, A., Zendri, E.: Characterisation of the lumps in the mortars of historic masonry. Thermochim. Acta 269/270, 809–816 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bruni, S., Cariati, F., Fermo, P.: White lumps in fifth-to seventeenth-century AD mortars from northern Italy. Archaeometry 39, 1–7 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hughes, J.J., Leslie, A., Callebaut, K.: The petrography of lime inclusions in historic lime based mortars. In: Proceedings of the 8th Euroseminar on Microscope Applied to Building Materials, Athens, pp. 359–364 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leslie, A., Hughes, J.J.: Binder microstructure in lime mortars: implications for the interpretation of analysis results. Quart. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 35. Geological Society of London, London, pp. 257–263 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elsen, J.: Microscopy of historic mortars – a review. Cem. Concr. Res. 36, 1416–1424 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Valek, J., Zeman, A.: Properties of historic mortars in relation to technology of their production. In: Proceedings of 11th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone, Torun, Poland, pp. 775–783 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Balen, K.: Modelling lime mortar carbonation. Mater. Struct. 27, 393–398 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lawrence, R.M., Mays, T.J., Rigby, S.P., Walker, P., D’Ayala, D.: Effects of carbonation on the pore structure of non-hydraulic lime mortars. Cem. Concr. Res. 37, 1059–1069 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neville, A.M.: Properties of Concrete. Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, London (1963)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Valek, J., Bartos, P.J.M.: Influences affecting compressive strength of modern non-hydraulic lime mortars used in masonry conservation. In: Proceedings of the STREMAH VII, Wessex Institute of Technology, WIT press Southampton, pp. 571–580 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lanas, J., Alvarez, J.I.: Masonry repair lime-based mortars: factors affecting the mechanical behaviour. Cem. Concr. Res. 33, 1867–1876 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Theoretical and Applied MechanicsAcademy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations