Advertisement

Culture, Environmental Psychology, and Well-Being: An Emergent Theoretical Framework

  • Nicola Rainisio
  • Paolo Inghilleri
Chapter
Part of the Cross-Cultural Advancements in Positive Psychology book series (CAPP, volume 3)

Abstract

The concept of nature has a great variability across cultures and could be considered as an artifact that contains and conveys cultural information.

The cross-cultural research on nature suggests that culture is a valuable theoretical framework to understand the wide range of place-oriented attitudes, emotions, and perceptions. Although it is a classic theme in the environmental psychology field, the positive psychological effects triggered by natural environments have been poorly investigated in a cross-cultural perspective, favoring an evolutionary orientation in attempting to settle universal processes. Our contribution criticizes this mainstream view suggesting a crossbreeding with some key concepts coming from positive and cultural psychology (optimal experience, flourishing, positive emotions, vitality, cultural self). Highlighting some recent researches with an alternative view of the nature-well-being relationship, we aim to propose a wider framework encompassing natural areas, positive place experiences and cultures of belonging.

Keywords

Positive Emotion Mental Fatigue Natural Context Place Attachment Cultural Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andereck, K., Valentine, K., Vogt, K., & Knopf, R. (2007). A cross-cultural analysis of tourism and quality of life perceptions. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15(5), 483–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balling, J. D., & Falk, J. H. (1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior, 14, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berlyne, D. E. (1950). Novelty and curiosity as determinants of exploratory behavior. British Journal of Psychology, 41(12), 68–80.Google Scholar
  4. Berlyne, D. E. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 180–191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry, J. W. (1980). Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In A. Padilla (Ed.), Acculturation: Theory, models and some new findings (pp. 9–25). Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32(7), 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, B., & Perkins, D. D. (1992). Disruptions in place attachment. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 279–304). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buijs, A. E., Elands, B. H. M., & Langers, F. (2009). No wilderness for immigrants: Cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91(3), 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Byrne, J., & Wolch, J. (2009). Nature, race, and parks: Past research and future directions for geographic research. Progress in Human Geography, 33(6), 743–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chavez, D. J. (2001). Managing outdoor recreation in California: Visitor contact studies 1989–1998 (General Technical Report PSW-GTR-180). Albany: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station.Google Scholar
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience: Steps toward enhancing the quality of life. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Massimini, F. (1985). On the psychological selection of bio-cultural information. New Ideas in Psychology, 3(2), 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J. (2010). Effortless attention in everyday life: A systematic phenomenology. In B. Bruya (Ed.), Effortless attention: A new perspective in the cognitive science of attention and action (pp. 179–190). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Delle Fave, A., Massimini, F., & Bassi, M. (2011). Psychological selection and optimal experience across cultures. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ehlers, E. (2003). Environment across culture: An introduction. In C. F. Gethmann & E. Ehlers (Eds.), Environment across cultures (pp. 1–9). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Falk, J. H., & Balling, J. D. (2010). Evolutionary influence on human landscape preference. Environment and Behavior, 42, 479–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Floyd, M. F., Bocarro, J. N., & Thompson, T. (2008). Research on race and ethnicity in leisure studies: A review of five major journals. Journal of Leisure Research, 40(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  21. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gesler, W. (1996). Lourdes: Healing in a place of pilgrimage. Health & Place, 2, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ham, T. Y., Guerin, D. A., & Scott, S. C. (2004). A cross-cultural comparison of preference for visual attributes in interior environments: America and China. Journal of Interior Design, 30(2), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Han, K. T. (2007). Responses to six major terrestrial biomes in terms of scenic beauty, preference, and restorativeness. Environment and Behavior, 39, 529–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hartig, T., & Staats, H. (2006). The need for psychological restoration as a determinant of environmental preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(3), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heerwagen, J. H., & Orians, G. H. (1986). Adaptations to windowlessness: A study of the use of visual decor in windowed and windowless offices. Environment and Behavior, 18(5), 623–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herzog, T. R., Herbert, E. J., Kaplan, R., & Crooks, C. L. (2000). Cultural and developmental comparisons of landscape perceptions and preferences. Environment and Behavior, 32, 323–346.Google Scholar
  28. Inghilleri, P. (1999). From subjective experience to cultural change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Inghilleri, P. (2003). La buona vita: Per l’uso creativo degli oggetti nella società dell’abbondanza. Milano: Guerini & Associati.Google Scholar
  30. Inghilleri, P. (Ed.). (2009). Psicologia culturale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.Google Scholar
  31. James, W. (1892). Psychology: The briefer course. New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaplan, R. (1983). The role of nature in the urban context. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 127–161). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaplan, S. (1987). Aesthetics, affect and cognition: Environmental preference from an evolutionary perspective. Environment and Behavior, 19, 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1978). Humanscape: Environments for people. North Scituate: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an uncertain world. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  37. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kaplan, S., & Talbot, J. F. (1983). Psychological benefits of a wilderness experience. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 163–203). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kaplan, R., & Talbot, J. F. (1988). Ethnicity and preference for natural settings: A review and recent findings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kellert, S. R. (1995). Concepts of nature east and west. In M. E. Soulé & G. Lease (Eds.), Reinventing nature?: Responses to postmodern deconstruction (pp. 103–121). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  41. Keyes, C. L. (2002). The mental health continuum: From languishing to flourishing in life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43, 207–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. (1961). Variations in value orientations. New York: Row Peterson.Google Scholar
  43. Korpela, K. (1992). Adolescents favorite places and environmental self-regulation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kuo, F. E., & Sullivan, W. C. (2001). Environment and crime in the inner city. Environment and Behavior, 33, 343–367.Google Scholar
  45. Kuo, F. E., Sullivan, W. C., Coley, R. L., & Brunson, L. (1998). Fertile ground for community: Inner-city neighborhood common spaces. American Journal of Community Psychology, 26(6), 823–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 1–12). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Massimini, F., & Delle Fave, A. (2000). Individual development in a bio-cultural perspective. American Psychologist, 55(1), 24–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Massimini, F., Inghilleri, P., & Delle, F. A. (1996). La selezione psicologica umana: Teoria e metodo d’analisi. Milano: Cooperativa Libraria IULM.Google Scholar
  50. Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically vs. analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922–934.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mayer, F. S., & McPherson-Frantz, C. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mayer, F. S., McPherson-Frantz, C., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial?: The role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Merchant, N. (2003). Reinventing Eden: The fate of nature in western culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Minteer, B. A., & Manning, R. E. (1999). Pragmatism in environmental ethics: Democracy, pluralism, and the management of nature. Environmental Ethics, 21, 191–208.Google Scholar
  55. Mitchell, R. G. (1983). Mountain experience: The psychology and sociology of adventure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  56. Miyamoto, Y., Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2006). Culture and the physical environment: Holistic versus analytic perceptual affordances. Psychological Science, 17, 113–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Monod, J. (1970). Le hasard et la nécessité. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  58. Nabhan, G. P. (1995). Cultural parallax in viewing North American habitats. In M. E. Soulé & G. Lease (Eds.), Reinventing nature?: Responses to postmodern deconstruction (pp. 87–101). Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  59. Nash, R. (1967). Wilderness and the American mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Prigogine, I. (1976). Order through fluctuation: Self-organization and social system. In E. Jantsch & L. H. Waddington (Eds.), Evolution and consciousness: Human systems in transition (pp. 93–133). Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  61. Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place identity: Physical social world organization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Redclift, M. (2003). Sustainability discourses: Human livelihoods and life chances. In C. F. Gethmann & E. Ehlers (Eds.), Environment across cultures (pp. 175–183). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  63. Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529–566.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ryan, R. M., Weinstein, N., Bernstein, J. H., Brown, K. W., Mistretta, L., & Gagné, M. (2010). Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shweder, R. A. (1991). Thinking trough cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Sieferle, P. (2003). The ends of nature. In C. F. Gethmann & E. Ehlers (Eds.), Environment across cultures (pp. 13–28). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  67. Staats, H., Kieviet, A., & Hartig, T. (2003). Where to recover from attentional fatigue: An expectancy-value analysis of environmental preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sullivan, W. C., Kuo, F. E., & Depooter, S. F. (2004). The fruit of urban nature. Environment and Behavior, 36(5), 678–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ulrich, R. S. (1981). Natural versus urban scenes: Some psychophysiological effects. Environment and Behavior, 13, 523–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R., Losito, B., Fiorito, E., Miles, M., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 17–40). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  73. Vygotskij, L. S. (1934/1962). Thought and speech. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  74. Wells, N. M. (2000). At home with nature: Effects of greenness on children’s cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32, 775–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Williams, K., & Harvey, D. (2001). Transcendent experience in forest environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yoon, H. (2003). A preliminary attempt to give a birdseye view on the nature of traditional eastern (Asian) and western (European) environmental ideas. In C. F. Gethmann & E. Ehlers (Eds.), Environment across cultures (pp. 123–142). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cultural Heritage and EnvironmentUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations