Advertisement

Skin Color and Blood Quantum: Getting the Red Out

  • Deb Bakken
  • Karen Branden
Chapter

Abstract

People with privilege have the power to determine their own identity. This is not true of minority groups. One unique process involves Native Americans who have to prove they are “Indian” by demonstrating they have “enough” tribal blood (at least 25%) to make them “Indian.” The system of blood quantum was built by an oppressive genocidal government of the past yet is readily accepted and continued today. It is not a coincidence that many tribes use the same system to determine membership. This is a clear example of how oppression, which is really built on the color of one’s skin, is effective. It is also a demonstration of policies used to rid or control people of “darker” skin. This chapter discusses the history of blood quantum, the impact of blood quantum’s oppressive policies on tribal membership, and the potential impact if policies are continued and offers some suggestions for change.

Keywords

Land Settlement Historical Trauma Literal Translation Indian Tribe Tribal Member 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Biko, S. (1972). I write what I like. Oxford: Heinemann Education.Google Scholar
  2. Brave Heart, M. Y. H., & DeBruyn, L. M. (1998). The American Indian holocaust: Healing historical and unresolved grief. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research Journal, 8(2), 60–82. www.ucdenver.edu/caianh. Accessed 20 Nov 2011.
  3. Child, B. (1998). Boarding school seasons: American Indian families, 1900–1940. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  4. Cook, R. (2000). Heart of colonialism bleeds blood quantum. http://americanindiansource.com/bloodquantum.html. Accessed 20 Nov 2011.
  5. Cornell, S. (1984). Crisis and response in Indian-White relations: 1960–1984. Social Problems, 32, 44–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deloria, Vine, Jr. (1998). Comfortable fictions and the struggle for turf: An essay review of ‘The invented Indian: Cultural fictions and government policy. In D. A. Mihesuah (Ed.), Natives and academics: Researching and writing about American Indians. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  7. Deloria, Vine, Jr., & Wildcat, D. R. (2001). Power and place: Indian education in America. Golden: American Indian Graduate Center.Google Scholar
  8. Duran, E., Firehammer, J., & Gonzalez, J. (2008). Liberation psychology as the path toward healing cultural soul wounds. Journal of Counseling and Development, 86(3), 288–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Durham, J. (1991). Understanding the history of tribal enrollment. American Indian Research Policy Institute. www.airpi.org/enroll.htm. Accessed 20 Nov 2011.
  10. Ebbott, E. (1985). Indians in Minnesota. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ericksen, E. P. (1997). Problems in sampling the Native American and Alaska native populations. Population Research and Policy Review, 16, 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the earth. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fanon, F. (1967). Black skin, white mask. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  14. Forbes, J. D. (2000). The people’s paths. Blood quantum: A relic of racism and termination. http://www.thepeoplespaths.net/Articles2000/JDForbes001126Blood.htm. Accessed 20 Nov 2011.
  15. Hilger, I. M. (1998). Chippewa families: A social study of White Earth Reservation, 1938. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society Press.Google Scholar
  16. Jaimes, A. M. (1999). Federal Indian identification policy: A usurpation of indigenous sovereignty in North America. In A. M. Josephy Jr., J. Nagel, & T. Johnson (Eds.), Red power: The American Indians’ fight for freedom. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  17. Josephy, A. M., Jr., Nagel, J., & Johnson, T. (1999). Red power: The American Indians’ fight for freedom. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  18. Memmi, A. (1965). The colonizer and the colonized. Boston: Orion Press/Beacon Press Books.Google Scholar
  19. Meyer, M. L. (1994). The white earth tragedy: Ethnicity and dispossession at a Minnesota Anishinaabe reservation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  20. Nagel, J. (1995). American Indian ethnic renewal: Politics and the resurgence of identity. American Sociological Review, 60, 947–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Peacock, T., & Wisuri, M. (2002). Ojibwe waasa inaabidaa: We look in all directions. Afton: Afton Historical Society Press.Google Scholar
  22. Thornton, R. (1997). Tribal membership requirements and the demography of ‘old’ and ‘new’ Native Americans. Population Research and Policy Review, 16, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Upper Mississippi Mental Health Center [UMMHC]. (2011). Tribal cultural competency training keynote address, “Liberation psychology,” by Dr. John Gonzales. blog.lib.umn.edu/mnahec/mnahec_events/registration%20form.pdf. Accessed 23 Nov 2011.
  24. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs [BIA]. (2000). Federal Register Volume 65, Number 75: Certificate of Degree of Indian or Alaska Native Blood [Page 20776]. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2000–04–18/html/00–9421.htm. Accessed 22 Nov 2011.
  25. US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs [BIA]. (2011). Genealogy. http://www.bia.gov/FOIA/Genealogy/index.htm. Accessed 20 Nov 2011.
  26. Weil, R. H. (1989). Destroying a homeland: White Earth, Minnesota. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 13(2), 69–95.Google Scholar
  27. WETCC. (2006). White Earth Tribal and Community College: WETCC Anishinaabe values. http://www.wetcc.org/anishinaabe_values.html. Accessed 23 Nov 2011.
  28. Willeto, A. A. A., & Goodluck, C. (2004). Economic, social, and demographic losses and gains among American Indians. Population Reference Bureau, http://www.prb.org/Articles/2004/EconomicSocialandDemographicLossesandGainsAmongAmericanIndians.aspx. Accessed 20 Nov 2011.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Criminal JusticeMinnesota State University MoorheadMoorheadUSA

Personalised recommendations