The Division of Responsibility and Contract Law

  • Martín Hevia
Part of the Law and Philosophy Library book series (LAPS, volume 101)


This chapter situates contract law in terms of what John Rawls calls “the social division of responsibility”: society as a whole has to provide individuals with an adequate share of opportunities and resources that they need in order to set and pursue their own conception of the good. Once individuals have those fair shares, citizens have to take responsibility for how their own lives go. An important way that people may pursue their plans is by entering into arrangements with others. This requires a system of contract rules. I argue that justice requires that we understand contract rules in terms of the idea of fair terms of interaction—that is, terms that would be accepted by reasonable persons moved by a desire for a social world in which they, as free and equal, can cooperate with others on terms they accept. The underlying idea is that of reciprocity, that is, the idea that individuals should not set the terms of their interactions with others unilaterally. I claim that contractual interactions should be approached from the perspective of the reasonable person.


Supra Note Distributive Justice Difference Principle Corrective Justice Social Cooperation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martín Hevia
    • 1
  1. 1.School of LawUniversidad Torcuato Di TellaBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations